Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Light on Hartman Green: Natural Scientists, Business Education, and an Ecological Business Paradigm

  • Essay
  • Published:
Humanistic Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable effort has been devoted over the last fifteen years by faculty and administrators in numerous colleges and universities, and by organizations such as the Aspen Institute and Teagle Foundation, to enhancing business education through broad infusion of the perspectives and content of the liberal arts. The emphasis has been on integration of the social sciences and especially the humanities. The author—a natural scientist—recounts a seminal experience that motivated him to work more intensively on this initiative with his colleagues across academic divisions at his home institution and beyond. He also argues for more engagement by natural science faculty in this process and examines the transdisciplinary re-visioning required to transform business teaching, learning, and practice into a new paradigm consistent with ecological reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, T. (2000). The great work: Our way into the future. Belltower.

  • Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Sullivan, W. M., & Dolle, J. R. (2011). Rethinking undergraduate business education: Liberal learning for the profession. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Vol. 20. Jossey-bass.

  • Costanza, R. (2020). Ecological economics in 2049: Getting beyond the argument culture to the world we all want. Ecological Economics, 168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106484.

  • Costanza, R., Cumberland, J. H., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., & Franco, C. (2014). An introduction to ecological economics (2nd ed). Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Costanza, R., Caniglia, E., Fioramonti, L., Kubiszewski, I., Lewis, H., Lovins, H., McGlade, J., Mortensen, L. F., Phillipsen, D., Pickett, K., Ragnarsdȯttir, C. V., Roberts, D., Sutton, P., Trebeck, K., Wallis, S., Ward, J., Weatherhead, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2018). Toward a sustainable wellbeing economy. Solutions, 9(2). https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/article/toward-sustainable-wellbeing-economy/.

  • Cullinan, C. (2011). Wild law: a manifesto for earth justice (2nd ed). Chelsea Green Publishing.

  • Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1994). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Beacon Press.

  • Eiseley, L. (1969). “The Star Thrower,” ch. 4 in The unexpected universe. Harcourt, Brace and World.

  • Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. Harper Collins.

  • Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L. H. (1999). Natural capitalism. Little, Brown & Company.

  • Head, B.W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3 (2): 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, G. (2012). The nature of business: Redesign for resilience. Green Books.

  • Hutchins, G. (2016). The illusion of separation: Exploring the cause of our current crises. Floris Books.

  • Korten, D. C. (2006). The great turning: From empire to earth community. Berrett-Koehler and Kumarian (Co-Publisher).

  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences 45: 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review 71 (3): 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, M. (2006). Life, money and illusion: Living on earth as if we want to stay. New Society Publishers.

  • Reed, B. (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research & Information 35 (6): 674–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701475753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, P., & Burton, R. J. F. (2011). Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability 3: 1090–1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3081090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D.W., Oches. E.A., Fletcher, D., Sipe, T. W., Nesteruk, J., Turner, S. P., Mooney, C. H., & Iverson, E. R. (2016). Developing transdisciplinary sustainability curricula requires an academic culture change. In the Trenches 6: 12–13. https://nagt.org/nagt/publications/trenches/articles/v6n3-7.html.

  • Townsend, A. K. (2009). Business ecology: Why most green business practices don’t work…and what to do about it. Schiffer.

  • Van der Ryn, S., & Cowan, S. (2007). Ecological design, tenth anniversary edition. Island Press.

  • Voosen, P. (2013). Who is conservation for? The Chronicle of Higher Educationhttps://www.chronicle.com/article/Who-Is-Conservation-For-/142853.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy W. Sipe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest represented by this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sipe, T.W. The Light on Hartman Green: Natural Scientists, Business Education, and an Ecological Business Paradigm. Humanist Manag J 5, 279–286 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-020-00082-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-020-00082-x

Keywords

Navigation