Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparative Evaluation of Attribute-Enabled Supervised Classification in Predicting the Air Quality

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 12 February 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Air pollution demonstrates the appearance of toxins into the air which is blocking human prosperity and the earth. It will portray as potentially the riskiest threats that humanity anytime faced. It makes hurt animals, harvests to thwart these issues in transportation territories need to expect air quality from pollutions utilizing AI systems and IoT. Along these lines, air quality evaluation and assumption has become a huge target for human health factors and also affect internal organs related to respiratory. The accuracy of Air Pollution prediction has been involved with the machine learning techniques and the best accuracy model is identified. The air quality prediction dataset is used for identifying the meteorology air pollution data while the predicted model is involved the decision tree computation for predicting the toxin contents in the region, the Air quality indicator is used to assess the pollution level and monitoring the air quality. The performance analysis shows that the decision tree technique has produced the better results in the performance metrics of Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score with the minimized error values while the comparative evaluation of Attribute-enabled classification has identified the best technique for predicting the air quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Sharma, P. K., De, T., & Saha, S. (2018). “IoT based indoor environment data modelling and prediction,“ 2018 10th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS), pp. 537–539.

  2. ., Gaganjot Kaur Kang, Lu, J. Z., & Xie, G. (2018). “Air Quality Prediction: Big Data and Machine Learning Approaches,” in International Journal of Environment Science and Development,

  3. ., Ishan Verma, Ahuja, R., Hardik Meisheri., and, & Dey, L. (2018). “Air Pollutant severity prediction using Bi-directional LSTM Network,” in IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI),

  4. Aly Akhtar, S. M., Gupta, C., & Masood, A. (2018). “Prediction and Analysis of Pollution Levels in Delhi Using Multilayer Perceptron,”

  5. Ling Wang., Xi-yuvan Xiao., and, & Meng, J. (2016). “Prediction of Air Pollution Based on FCM-HMM Multi-model,” in Proceedings of the 35th Chinese Control Conference,

  6. ., Khaled Bashir Shaban, Kadri, A., & Rezk, E. (2016). “Urban Air Pollution Monitoring System with Forecasting Models,”in IEEE Sensors Journal,

  7. Ameer, S. (2019). “Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Air Quality in Smart Cities,“ in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 128325–128338,

  8. Taneja, S., Sharma, N., Oberoi, K., & Navoria, Y. (2016). “Predicting trends in air pollution in Delhi using data mining,“ 2016 1st India International Conference on Information Processing (IICIP), pp. 1–6.

  9. Atakan Kurt and Ayse Betul Oktay (2010). “Forecasting air pollutant indicator levels with geographic models 3 days in advance using neural networks,” in Expert Systems with Applications 37 7986–7992, 2010.

  10. Zhang, C., Yan, J., Li, Y., Sun, F., Zhang, J., Xiaoguang Rui., and, & Bie, R. (2017). “Early Air Pollution Forecasting as a Service: an Ensemble Learning Approach,” in IEEE 24th International Conference on Web Services, 2017.

  11. Temesegan Walelign Ayele and, & Mehta, R. (2018). “Air pollution monitoring and prediction using IoT,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Internaional Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT 2018) IEEE Xplore Compliant,

  12. ., Dixian Zhu, Cai, C., Tianbao Yang., and, & Zhou, X. (2018). “A Machine Learning Approach for Air Quality Prediction: Model Regularization and Optimization,” in Big data and cognitive computing,

  13. Tao, X., Yi, J., Pu, Z., & Xiong, T. (2019). “State-Estimator-Integrated Robust Adaptive Tracking Control for Flexible Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle With Noisy Measurements,“ in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 4285–4299, Nov.

  14. Zhiwen, H., Bai, Z., & Bian, K. (2019). “Real-Time Fine-Grained Air Quality Sensing Networks in Smart City: Design, Implementation and Optimization,” inIEEE Internet of Things Journal,

  15. Qin, D., Yu, J., Zou, G., Yong, R., Zhao, Q., & Zhang, B. (2019). “A Novel Combined Prediction Scheme Based on CNN and LSTM for Urban PM2.5 Concentration,“ in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 20050–20059,

  16. Kumar, K., & Pande, B. P. (2022). Air pollution prediction with machine learning: a case study of Indian cities.Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.

  17. Lei, T. M. T., Siu, S. W. I., Monjardino, J., Mendes, L., & Ferreira, F. (2022). Using machine learning methods to Forecast Air Quality: a Case Study in Macao. Atmosphere, 13, 1412.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalaivani, G., & Mayilvahanan, P. (2021). “Air Quality Prediction and Monitoring using Machine Learning Algorithm based IoT sensor- A researcher’s perspective,“ 2021 6th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), pp. 1–9.

  19. Wood, D. A. (2022). Local integrated air quality predictions from meteorology (2015 to 2020) with machine and deep learning assisted by data mining, Sustainability Analytics and Modeling, Volume 2,

  20. https://www.kaggle.com/c/air-pollution-prediction

  21. Bekkar, A., Hssina, B., Douzi, S., & Douzi, K. (2022). “Air Quality Forecasting using decision trees algorithms,“ 2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET), pp. 1–4.

  22. Li, J., Shao, X., & Zhao, H. (2018). “An Online Method Based on Random Forest for Air Pollutant Concentration Forecasting,“ 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), pp. 9641–9648.

  23. Xiao, Y., Ma, Y., & Ding, H. (2018). “Air traffic flow prediction based on k nearest neighbor regression,“ 2018 13th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), pp. 1265–1269.

  24. Jiang, B. (2021). “An improved naive bayes model for air temperature prediction,“ 2021 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), pp. 113–120.

  25. Weizhen, Lu (2002). “Air pollutant parameter forecasting using support vector machines,“ Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN’02 (Cat. No.02CH37290), pp. 630–635 vol.1.

  26. Masoomeh Zeinalnezhad, A. G., Chofreh, F. A., & Goni (2020). Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, Air pollution prediction using semi-experimental regression model and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System,Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 261,

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of computer science and Engineering, VIT Chennai campus, Tamilnadu, India

    P. Subbulakshmi

  2. Data Analytics Lab, Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Ramco Institute of Technology, Rajapalayam, Tamilnadu, India

    S. Vimal

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Francis Xavier Engineering College, Tirunelveli, India

    Y. Harold Robinson

  4. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University Centre for Research & Development, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab, India

    Amit Verma

  5. Department of Computer Science, Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University, Odisha, India

    Janmenjoy Nayak

Authors
  1. P. Subbulakshmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Vimal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Harold Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amit Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Janmenjoy Nayak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to P. Subbulakshmi, S. Vimal, Y. Harold Robinson, Amit Verma or Janmenjoy Nayak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interests. This research does not involve any human or animal participation. All authors have checked and agreed the submission.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-024-00575-z

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Subbulakshmi, P., Vimal, S., Robinson, Y.H. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparative Evaluation of Attribute-Enabled Supervised Classification in Predicting the Air Quality. Spat. Inf. Res. 31, 399–407 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-023-00507-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-023-00507-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation