Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determinants of regional inequality in female work participation in Lower Gangetic Plain Region of India

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is aimed at analysing the pattern of female work participation by disaggregating the information at regional level and further by inter-district variation. Moreover, this study tries to explore the factors which affect inter-regional variation in the percentage of female workers in rural areas and analyses the reasons of such. An attempt to reveal the differentiation in male and female work participation rate in different physiographic regions of West Bengal based on the secondary data collected from Census of India, 2011. Different statistical measures are employed to assess the level of inequality in work participation in different social strata of the society. Spatial pattern of work participation has been identified with the help of GIS techniques. The study reveled that the all-India pattern shows a great accentuation in regional differences in female work participation rate depending upon agro-ecological conditions prevailing within a physiographic region. The result has shown that female participation is generally lower (16.69%) compared to their male (41.63%) counterparts in 2011. The study found that socially deprived segments such as the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribe women display much higher level of participation compared to their more fortunate sisters belonging to the non-scheduled category. The study found that disparity is far less in geographically difficult areas and where agriculture is not well developed due to physiographic constraints such as in Hill and Terai region or in West Rarh Plateau Fringe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Regional Division of India—A Cartographic Analysis, Series 1, Vol. XIV, India, 1991

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

H & T:

Hill and Terai

NBP:

North Bengal Plain

SBP:

South Bengal Plain

ERP:

East Rarh Plain

WRPF:

West Rarh and Plateau Fringe

TFMW:

Total female main worker

CUL:

Cultivator

A.Lab:

Agricultural labour

OW:

Other worker

C.I:

Composite index

FWPR:

Female work participation rate

WPR:

Work participation rate

References

  1. Sinha, S. (2005). Female work participation rates in rural West Bengal: A village level analysis. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 48(3), 563–577.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mainuddin, M. (2012). Education and women’s participation in Indian economy: A regional analysis. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 5(2), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP11.079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gulati, L. (1976). Unemployment among female agricultural labourers. Economic and Political Weekly, 11(13), A31–A39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vlasblom, J. D., & Schippers, J. (2006). Changing dynamics in female employment around childbirth evidence from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK. Work, Employment & Society, 20(2), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006064117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bardhan, P. K. (1979). Labor supply functions in a poor agrarian economy. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hossain, M., Bose, M. L., & Ahmad, A. (2004). Nature and impact of women’s participation in economic activities in rural Bangladesh: insights from household surveys. Working Papers, Department of Economics, Lund University (Vol. 20, pp. 1697–1704).

  7. Singh, U. V., & Mishra, N. K. (2013). Women work participation in rural Uttar Pradesh: A regional analysis. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 2(8), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dev, S. M. (2004). Female work participation and child labour: Occupational data from NFHS. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(7), 736–744.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Srivastava, N., & Srivastava, R. (2010). Women, work, and employment outcomes in rural India. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(28), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Datta, A., & Mishra, S. K. (2011). Glimpses of women’s lives in rural Bihar: Impact of male migration. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 54(3), 457–477.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arun, S. (2001). Does land ownership make a difference? Women’s roles in agriculture in Kerala, India. Gender Perspectives on Property and Inheritance, 7(3), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/741923248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nayyar, R. (1987). Female participation rates in rural India. Economic and Political Weekly, 22(51), 2207–2216.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosh, B. (2001). Women’s work and informal sectors: Two studies in Burdwan, West Bengal. Socialist Perspective, 29(1–2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saha, B., & Bahal, R. (2010). Livelihood diversification pursued by farmers in West Bengal, Indian. Research Journal of Extension Education, 10(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldin, C. (1994). The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history, NBER working paper series, National Bureau of Economic Research, 4707, Cambridge.

  16. Mitra, A., & Singh, P. (2006). Human capital attainment and female labor force participation: The Kerala Puzzle. Journal of Economic Issues, 40(3), 779–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mammen, K., & Paxson, C. (2000). Women’s work and economic development. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jain, D., & Chand, M. (1982). Women’s work and employment, report on a time allocation study: Its methodological implication. New Delhi: Institute of Social Studies Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chakraborty, I., & Chakraborty, A. (2010). Female work participation and gender differential in earning in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Quantitative Economics, 8(2), 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarkar, P. R. (2004). Rárh: The cradle of civilization. Kolkata: Ananda Marga Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mistry, M. B. (2005). Muslims in India: A demographic and socio-economic profile. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 25(3), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602000500408468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chattopadhyay, M. (1982). Role of female labour in Indian agriculture. Social Scientist, 10(7), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/3516937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Billings, M. H., & Singh, A. (1970). Mechanisation and the wheat revolution: Effects on female labour in Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly, 5(52), A169–A174.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ray, S., & Debnath, M. (2019). Assessment of regional inequality in female work participation: measurement of disparity and determinants. Feminist Research, 3(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21523/gcj2.19010101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kulkarni, S. (1994). Dependence on agricultural employment. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(51/52), 3260–3262.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Debnath, M., & Ray, S. (2019). Rural male-out-migration and its dynamic links with native villages: a study of selected villages of Rarh Region of West Bengal, India. Journal of Geographical Studies, 3(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.21523/gcj5.19030201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Debnath, M. (2020). Exploring the behavior of seasonal agricultural migrants in the Rarh region of West Bengal, India. Spatial Information Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00338-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sengupta, A. (2012). Status of women agricultural workers in West Bengal during the post-reform period. Social Work Chronicle, 1(1), 55–88.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dasgupta, P., & Goldar, B. (2006). Female labour supply in rural India: An econometric analysis. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 49(2), 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gartaula, H. N., Niehof, A., & Visser, L. (2010). Feminization of agriculture as an effect of male out migration: Unexpected outcomes from Jhapa District, Eastern Nepal. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(2), 565–577.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tamang, S., Paude, P. K., & Shrestha, K. K. (2014). Feminization of agriculture and its implications for food security in rural Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 12(1), 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olsen, W. (2006). A pluralist account of labour participation in India. Economics series working papers, GPRG-WPS-042, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Editor-in-Chief and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, School of Human and Environmental Sciences, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya, 793022, India

    Sheuli Ray & Manoj Debnath

  2. Department of Geography, Mahatma Gandhi College (Sidho Kanho Birsha University), Purulia, West Bengal, India

    Sheuli Ray

Authors
  1. Sheuli Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manoj Debnath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheuli Ray.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ray, S., Debnath, M. Determinants of regional inequality in female work participation in Lower Gangetic Plain Region of India. Spat. Inf. Res. 29, 231–246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00348-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00348-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation