Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical Recreation of Field Cases on a Biofidelic Human FE Model Involving Deformable Less-Lethal Projectiles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1970s, there has been an increased interest in the use and development of less lethal kinetic energy (LLKE) projectiles. These weapons are mainly used by law enforcement officers worldwide in cases of riot and crowd control. Even if such projectiles are designed to incapacitate an individual with a low risk of serious injuries, the literature indicates a risk of thorax injuries like rib fractures and lung and heart contusions when a projectile strikes the body. Among published articles discussing the wounding potential of LLKE projectiles, two are particularly well documented describing two field cases involving deformable projectiles (eXact iMpact™ and Flash-Ball®). However, one question remains: how to properly exploit field cases in order to find both injury thresholds and guidelines for the design of LLKE projectiles? Hence, the authors focus their research on the use of numerical tools as the finite element (FE) method to recreate the real impact conditions on a biofidelic human torso FE model. It requires the accurate modeling of the deformable projectiles at dynamic strain rates. To address that issue, the study begins by several ballistic experiments on a rigid wall equipped with a load sensor and a high-speed camera. The impact force measured and high-speed images are directly used in an inverse procedure to optimize model parameters of the concerned projectile to correlate impact experiments and modeling. Finally, this is followed by the impact modeling on the human torso FE model and the identification of model-dependent numerical metrics suitable to predict lung and heart contusions. While efforts need to be pursued, this present research provides an interesting step towards designing effective and reliable LLKE projectiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Brito D, Challoner KR, Sehgal A, Mallon W (Oct. 2001) The injury pattern of a new law enforcement weapon: the police bean bag. Ann Emerg Med 38(4):383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kobayashi M, Mellen PF (Sep. 2009) Rubber bullet injury: case report with autopsy observation and literature review. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 30(3):262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ritchie AJ (1992) Plastic bullets: significant risk of serious injury above the diaphragm. Injury 23(4):265–266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Wahl P, Schreyer N, Yersin B (Oct. 2006) Injury pattern of the Flash-Ball®, a less-lethal weapon used for law enforcement: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Emerg Med 31(3):325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Suyama J, Panagos PD, Sztajnkrycer MD, FitzGerald DJ, Barnes D (2003) Injury patterns related to use of less-lethal weapons during a period of civil unrest. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 25(2):219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bir C, Viano D, King A (2004) Development of biomechanical response corridors of the thorax to blunt ballistic impacts. J Biomech 37(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bir C, Viano DC (Dec. 2004) Design and injury assessment criteria for blunt ballistic impacts. J Trauma 57(6):1218–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prat N, Rongieras F, de Freminville H, Magnan P, Debord E, Fusai T, Destombe C, Sarron JC, Voiglio EJ (2012) Comparison of thoracic wall behavior in large animals and human cadavers submitted to an identical ballistic blunt thoracic trauma. Forensic Sci Int 222(1–3):179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pavier J, Langlet A, Eches N, Prat N, Bailly P, Jacquet J-F (2015) Experimental study of the coupling parameters influencing the terminal effects of thoracic blunt ballistic impacts. Forensic Sci Int 252:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bresson F, Ducouret J, Peyré J, Maréchal C, Delille R, Colard T, Demondion X (2012) Experimental study of the expansion dynamic of 9mm Parabellum hollow point projectiles in ballistic gelatin. Forensic Sci Int 219(1–3):113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo S, Xu C, Chen A, Zhang X (2016) Experimental investigation of the response of gelatine behind the soft body armor. Forensic Sci Int 266:8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bracq A, Haugou G, Delille R, Lauro F, Roth S, Mauzac O (2017) Experimental study of the strain rate dependence of a synthetic gel for ballistic blunt trauma assessment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 72:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bracq A (2018) “Towards the prediction of thoracic injuries during blunt ballistic impacts through experimental and numerical approaches,” Thesis, Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambresis

  14. Gayzik FS, Moreno DP, Vavalle NA, Rhyne AC, Stitzel JD (2011) Development of the global human body models consortium mid-sized male full body model. In: Injury Biomechanics Research, Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth International Workshop

  15. Shigeta K, Kitagawa Y, Yasuki T (2009) Development of next generation human FE model capable of organ injury prediction. In: Enhanced Safety of Vehicle Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 15–18

  16. Kang J, Chen J, Dong P, Liu H, Zhang Q (2012) Numerical simulation of human torso dynamics under non-penetrating ballistic impact on soft armor. Int J Dig Content Technol Appl 6(22):843–850

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts JC, Merkle AC, Biermann PJ, Ward EE, Carkhuff BG, Cain RP, O’Connor JV (2007) Computational and experimental models of the human torso for non-penetrating ballistic impact. J Biomech 40(1):125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roth S, Torres F, Feuerstein P, Thoral-Pierre K (2013) Anthropometric dependence of the response of a thorax FE model under high speed loading: validation and real world accident replication. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 110(2):160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bodo M, Bracq A, Delille R, Marechal C, Roth S (2017) Thorax injury criteria assessment through non-lethal impact using an enhanced biomechanical model. J Mech Med Biol 1–17

  20. Awoukeng Goumtcha A, Bodo M, Taddei L, Roth S (2016) From military to civil loadings: preliminary numerical-based thorax injury criteria investigations: thoracic injury criteria from numerical study of real-world accident. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 32(3):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nsiampa N, Robbe C, Papy A (2018) Non-lethal projectile characterisation method: application to 40-mm SIR-X and condor NT901 projectiles. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety 2(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor G (1948) The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress I. Theoretical considerations. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 194(1038):289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bracq A, Haugou G, Bourel B, Delille R, Maréchal C, Lauro F, Roth S, Mauzac O (2018) Characterization of a visco-hyperelastic synthetic gel for ballistic impacts assessment. In: Kimberley J, Lamberson L, Mates S (eds) Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Volume 1: Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 109–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Bracq A, Haugou G, Bourel B, Maréchal C, Lauro F, Roth S, Mauzac O (2018) On the modeling of a visco-hyperelastic polymer gel under blunt ballistic impacts. Int J Impact Eng 118:78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bracq A, Haugou G, Morvan H (2019) Constitutive modeling of polyamide split Hopkinson pressure bars for the design of a pre-stretched apparatus. In: Kimberley J, Lamberson LE, Mates S (eds) Dynamic behavior of materials, vol 1. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 201–205

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kolsky H (1949) An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc Sect B 62(11):676–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Storåkers B (1986) On material representation and constitutive branching in finite compressible elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 34(2):125–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prat N, Rongieras F, Voiglio E, Magnan P, Destombe C, Debord E, Barbillon F, Fusai T, Sarron JC (2010) Intrathoracic pressure impulse predicts pulmonary contusion volume in ballistic blunt thoracic trauma. J Trauma 69(4):749–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greer A, Cronin D, Salisbury C, Williams K (2005) Finite element modeling for the prediction of blast trauma. In: Gilchrist MD (ed) IUTAM Symposium on Impact Biomechanics: From Fundamental Insights to Applications, vol 124. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 263–271

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Bouamoul A, Williams K (2010) Effect of uman and sheep lung orientation on primary blast injury induced by single blast. In: Personal Armour Systems Symposium. Québec, Canada, pp. 149–156

Download references

Funding

This research is funded by the French Ministry of the Interior and is carried out within the framework of the CNRS Research Federation on Ground Transports and Mobility, in articulation with the ELSAT2020 project supported by the European Community, the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research, the Hauts de France Regional Council, and the AIP-Primeca Nord-Pas de Calais group. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of these institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, Laboratory LAMIH UMR CNRS 8201, 59313, Valenciennes, France

    A. Bracq, R. Delille, B. Bourel, C. Maréchal, G. Haugou & F. Lauro

  2. Interdisciplinary Carnot Laboratory of Bourgogne, UMR CNRS 6303, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UBFC, 90010, Belfort, France

    S. Roth

  3. French Ministry of the Interior, CREL/SAELSI, Place Beauveau, Paris, France

    O. Mauzac

Authors
  1. A. Bracq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Delille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Bourel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Maréchal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Haugou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Lauro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. Roth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. O. Mauzac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bracq.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bracq, A., Delille, R., Bourel, B. et al. Numerical Recreation of Field Cases on a Biofidelic Human FE Model Involving Deformable Less-Lethal Projectiles. Hum Factors Mech Eng Def Saf 3, 5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41314-019-0022-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41314-019-0022-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation