Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of CO2 emissions in RC structures considering local and global databases

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studying how various economic activities affect the environment is becoming increasingly important, especially in light of the greenhouse effect's contributing factor, atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. With all the extraction, production, and transportation of materials involved in its supply chain, civil building is one of the economic activities with the biggest environmental impact. Concrete, one of the most used building materials, stands out for significantly increasing CO2 emissions. In order to lessen the environmental impact of reinforced concrete building structures, this work evaluates the CO2 emissions of materials, as well as the variations in those emissions caused by the used databases. Initially, three scenarios that took into account various characteristic strengths and the cradle-to-gate phase were considered to analyze CO2 emissions from the raw materials used in the manufacturing of reinforced concrete for the same research region. These scenarios were obtained considering: a survey of emissions from the main raw materials involved in the production and execution of reinforced concrete structures in the region of study; the use of global emissions obtained with SimaPro software; and the adaptation, in the same software, to values obtained to the study region, related to concrete mixes, transportation distances, and electricity consumption. In the sequence, a reinforced concrete building structure was analyzed considering the adopted scenarios, and the behaviors and contributions of elements and components were investigated. Among the conclusions, the study demonstrated the importance of using local data collected particularly for the study region rather than data from global databases. In addition, it was found that the most environmentally beneficial concrete, considering the whole building, corresponded to those with lower characteristic strengths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang X, Wang F (2015) Life-cycle assessment and control measures for carbon emissions of typical buildings in China. Build Environ 86:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. United Nations Environment Programme (2022) 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi, Kenya.

  3. Gan VJL, Cheng JCP, Lo IMC (2019) A comprehensive approach to mitigation of embodied carbon in reinforced concrete buildings. J Clean Prod 229:582–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabello JF, Garcia EF, Ascacibar EMP, Ascacibar FJMP (2016) Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions and cost for structures with flat slabs. J Clean Prod 137:922–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D’ Alessandro A, Fabiani C, Pisello AL, Ubertini F, Materazzi AL, Cotana F (2017) Innovative concrete for low-carbon constructions: a review. Int J Low-Carbon Technol 12:289–309

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dede T, Kripka M, Togan V, Yepes V, Rao RV (2019) Usage of optimization techniques in civil engineering during the last two decades. Curr Trends Civil Struct Eng 2:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Negrín I, Kripka M, Yepes V (2023) Metamodel-assisted design optimization in the field of structural engineering: a literature review. Structures 52:609–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boscardin J, Yepes V, Kripka M (2019) Optimization of reinforced concrete building frames with an automated grouping of columns. Autom Constr 104:331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tres Junior FL, Yepes V, Medeiros GF, Kripka M (2023) Multi-objective optimization applied to the design of sustainable pedestrian bridges. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(4):3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dede T, Kankal M, Vosoughi AR, Grzywinski M, Kripka M (2019) Artificial intelligence applications in civil engineering. Adv Civil Eng (Print) 2019:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sánchez-Garrido AJ, Navarro IJ, Yepes V (2022) Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on modern methods of construction. J Clean Prod 330:129724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bianchi PF, Yepes V, Vitorio PC Jr, Kripka M (2021) Study of alternatives for the design of sustainable low-income housing in Brazil. Sustainability 13(9):4757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Milani CJ, Kripka M (2019) Evaluation of short span bridge projects with a focus on sustainability. Struct Infrastruct Eng 16:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  14. Santoro JF, Kripka M (2017) Studies on environmental impact assessment of reinforced concrete in different life cycle phases. Int J Struct Glass Adv Mater Res 1(2):32–40

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paik I, Na S, Yoon S (2019) Assessment of CO2 emissions by replacing an ordinary reinforced concrete slab with the void slab system in a high-rise commercial residential complex building in South Korea. Sustainability 11(82):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walach D, Dybel P, Sagan J, Gicala M (2019) Environmental of ordinary and new generation concrete structures-a comparative analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:3980–3990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller SA, Horvath A, Monteiro PJM (2016) Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%. Environ Res Lett 11:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Favier A, De Wolf C, Scrivener K, Habert G (2018) A sustainable future for the Europen Cemente and Concrete Industry, Technology assessment for full decarbonisation of the industry by 2050. Research Collection, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne.

  19. Yoon Y, Kim K, Lee S, Yeo D (2018) Sustainable design for reinforced concrete columns through embodied energy and CO2 emission optimization. Energy Build 174:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oh BK, Choi SW, Park HS (2017) Influence of variations in CO2 emission data upon environmental impact of building construction. J Clean Prod 140(3):1194–1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Erlacher G, Calenzani AFG, Alves EC (2023) Topological optimization of composite trusses considering CO2 emission via metaheuristics algorithms. Revista Ibracon de Estruturas e Materiais 16:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guimaraes SA, Klein D, Calenzani AFG, Alves EC (2022) Optimum design of steel columns filled with concrete via genetic algorithm: environmental impact and cost analysis. REM Int Eng J 75:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Penadés-Plà V, Martí JV, García-Segura T, Yepes V (2017) Life-cycle assessment: a comparison between two optimal post-tensioned concrete box-girder road bridges. Sustainability 9:1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee J, Tae S, Kim R (2018) A study on the analysis of CO2 emissions of apartment housing in the construction process. Sustain J 10(365):1–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Souto-Martinez A, Arehart JH, Srubar WV III (2018) Cradle-to-gate CO2e emissions vs. in situ CO2 sequestration of structural concrete elements. Energy Build 167:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eleftheriadis S, Duffour P, Greening P, Stephenson B, Mumovic D (2018) Investigating relationships between cost and CO2 emissions in reinforced concrete structures using a BIM-based design optimisation approach. Energy Build 166:330–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fraile-Gracia E, Ferreiro-Cabello J, Martínez de Pisón FJ, Pernia-Espinoza AV (2019) Effects off design and construction on the carbon footprint of reinforced concrete columns in residential buildings. Mater Constr 69(335):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cabeza LF, Boquera L, Chàfer M, Vérez D (2021) Embodied energy and embodied carbon of structural building materials: Worldwide progress and barriers through literature map analysis. Energy Build, 231.

  29. Brasil Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2014), “Inventário Nacional de Emissões Atmosféricas por Veículos Automotores Rodoviários 2013 Ano Base 2012”, Brasília.

  30. Brasil Ministério de Minas e Energia (2018), “Balanço Energético Nacional 2018, Ano Base 2017”, Rio de Janeiro.

  31. Brasil Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia (2010) “Segundo Inventário Brasileiro de Emissões e Remoções Antrópicas de Gases de Efeito Estufa – Processos Industriais, Produtos Minerais, Produção de Cimento”, Brasília.

  32. Brasil Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia (2010) “Segundo Inventário Brasileiro de Emissões e Remoções Antrópicas de Gases de Efeito Estufa – Processos Industriais, Produção de Metais, Ferro e Aço”, Brasília.

  33. Santoro JF, Kripka M (2020) Minimizing environmental impact from optimized sizing of reinforced concrete elements. Comput Concr 25:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  34. Santoro JF (2021) Subsidies for minimizing the environmental impact of reinforced concrete building structures. PhD Thesis, University of Passo Fundo.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Sul-Rio-Grandense Federal Institute, Passo Fundo, 99064-440, Brazil

    Jair F. Santoro

  2. Civil and Environmental Engineering Graduate Program, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, 99052-900, Brazil

    Moacir Kripka

Authors
  1. Jair F. Santoro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Moacir Kripka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moacir Kripka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santoro, J.F., Kripka, M. Evaluation of CO2 emissions in RC structures considering local and global databases. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 9, 33 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01345-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01345-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation