Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pragmatic Truths in Organization Studies

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Truth matters for organization studies, but it has been neglected as a topic of research. Positivist scholars do not tend to question assumptions about the relationship between knowledge and the world, while critical theorists tend to view ‘truth’ as an outdated, metaphysical way to describe it. However, the pragmatic philosophical tradition of inquiry into truth has not yet received enough attention within organization studies. This essay presents a genealogical account of that tradition by conducting a close reading of texts by C.S. Pierce, William James, Hilary Putnam and Richard Rorty. Following this reading, we identify pragmatic truths that pertain to the qualitative v. quantitative, rigor v. relevance, and positivist v. critical tensions that currently animate our field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, Nancy J. 2006. The Arts & Leadership: Now that we can do anything, what will we do? Academy of Management Learning & Education 5 (4): 486–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Paul S. 2007. The future of critical management studies: A paleo-Marxist critique of labour process theory. Organization Studies 28 (9): 1313–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopoulou, E.P. 2010. Making the business school more 'Critical': Reflexive critique based on Phronesis as a Foundation for Impact. British Journal of Management 21 (1): 6–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, G. 1985. Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (4): 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, G., and R. Zammuto. 1992. Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science 3 (4): 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, Alain. 2014. Infinite thought: Truth and the return to philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E., and J. Davison. 2013. Visual management studies: Empirical and theoretical approaches*. International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (2): 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., and G. Morgan. 1979. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S., J.E. Dutton, and R.E. Quinn. 2003. An introduction to positive organizational scholarship. In Positive organizational scholarship, ed. K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton, and R.E. Quinn, 3–13. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, Barbara. 1998. A narrative approach to organization studies. Vol. 43. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. 1983. Learning the craft of organizational research. Academy of Management Review. 8 (4): 539–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R., and A. Lewin. 1990. Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organization Science 1 (1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. 1996. Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their legacy. Organization Science 7 (2): 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, W., and J. Bailey. 1994. Examining the origins of management theory: Value divisions in the positivist program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 30 (3): 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D., and Kramer, R. M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of qualitative organizational research: Innovative pathways and methods. Routledge

  • Edmondson, Amy C., and Stacy E. McManus. 2007. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1246–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farjoun, M., Christopher Ansell, and Arjen Boin. 2015. PERSPECTIVE—Pragmatism in organization studies: Meeting the challenges of a dynamic and complex world. Organization Science 26 (6): 1787–1804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, and James D. Faubion. 2000. Ethics subjectivity and truth; the essential works of Michael Foucault, 1954–1984. New York: New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., D. Gilbert, and E. Hartman. 1988. Values and the foundations of strategic management. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (11): 821–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Yiannis. 1995. The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies and subjectivity. Organization Studies 16 (3): 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & DG Marshall, trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S (2005) Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 75–91.

  • Grant, R.M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (S2): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. 1994. Presidential address: What if the academy actually mattered? The Academy of Management Review 19 (1): 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 2004. The essence of truth: On Plato's parable of the cave and the Theaetetus. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helin, J., T. Hernes, D. Hjorth, and R. Holt, eds. 2014. The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Robin, and Frank Mueller. 2011. Wittgenstein, Heidegger and drawing lines in organization studies. Organization Studies 32 (1): 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, William. 1907. Pragmatism's conception of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4 (6): 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T., and J. Sandström. 2013. In Defence of stakeholder pragmatism. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2): 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küpers, W., and D.J. Pauleen, eds. 2013. A handbook of practical wisdom: Leadership, organization and integral business practice. Burlington: Gower Publishing, Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Karen, Karen Golden-Biddle, and Martha S. Feldman. 2008. Perspective-making doubt generative: rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science 19 (6): 907–918 re Peirce.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Vol. 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, B., D. Rooney, and K.B. Boal. 2009. Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 20 (2): 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R.E., M.A. Höllerer, D. Jancsary, and T. Van Leeuwen. 2013. The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. The Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 489–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, John. 2008. Management knowledge and knowledge management: Realism and forms of truth. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6 (1): 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. 1980. Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (4): 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2011. The will to power. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, Ikujiro. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5 (1): 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and G. Von Krogh. 2009. Perspective-tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science 20 (3): 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., R. Chia, R. Holt, and V. Peltokorpi. 2014. Wisdom, management and organization. Management Learning 45 (4): 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13 (3): 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J and Fong CT (2002) The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education 1: 78–95.

  • Pfeffer J (2005) Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 96–100.

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1878. How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly 12: 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, truth and history. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, Peter. 2003. Pragmatist philosophy and action research readings and conversation with Richard Rorty. Action Research 1 (1): 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1995. Is truth a goal of enquiry? Davidson vs. Wright. The Philosophical Quarterly 45 (180): 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruwhiu, D., and M. Cone. 2012. Pragmatic leadership: A return to wisdom. Journal of Management & Organization 19 (01): 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salovaara, Perttu. 2014. Video: Leadership in spaces and places. Organizational Aesthetics 3 (1): 79–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, Sonali K., and Kevin G. Corley. 2006. Building better theory by bridging the quantitative–qualitative divide*. Journal of Management Studies 43 (8): 1821–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J., and H. Tsoukas. 2014a. Performing phronesis: On the way to engaged judgment. Management Learning 45 (4): 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Barbara. 2009. Pragmatism, mead and the practice turn. Organization Studies 30 (12): 1329–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A.E. 2010. Integrating ethics and strategy: A pragmatic approach. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4): 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.C. 1996. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (S2): 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, André, Mats Alvesson, and Dan Kärreman. 2009. Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human relations 62 (4): 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A. and Tempest, S. (2004) ‘Rethinking the business school: a European perspective’,Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1521–31.

  • Statler, M., 2014. Developing wisdom in a business school? Critical reflections on pedagogical practice. Management learning, 45(4), pp.397-417.

  • Statler, M., and P.G. de Monthoux. 2015. Humanities and arts in management education the emerging Carnegie paradigm. Journal of Management Education 39 (1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, John. 1979. Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (4): 520–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, Freek. 2005. On rigor and relevance: Fostering dialectic progress in management research. Academy of Management Journal 48 (6): 978–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T.J. 2011. Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of ‘how things work’ in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies 48 (1): 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. 2004. Vita Contemplativa mundane poetics: Searching for wisdom in organization studies. Organization Studies 25 (4): 653–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf, Richard, and Hugh Willmott. 2013. Ethics as critical practice: The “pentagon papers”, deciding responsibly, truth-telling, and the unsettling of organizational morality. Organization Studies 34 (4): 469–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, Andrew C., and R. Edward Freeman. 1998. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science 9 (2): 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. 2012. Reframing relevance as ‘social usefulness’: A comment on Hodgkinson and Starkey's ‘not simply returning to the same answer over and over again’. British Journal of Management 23 (4): 598–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M.N. 1996. More fragmentation? Unfinished business in linking the social sciences and the humanities. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (2): 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NYU Stern School of Business, New York, NY, USA

    Matt Statler & Perttu Salovaara

Authors
  1. Matt Statler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Perttu Salovaara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Statler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Statler, M., Salovaara, P. Pragmatic Truths in Organization Studies. Philosophy of Management 16, 265–278 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-017-0068-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-017-0068-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation