Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Geocell Geometry and Multi-layer System on the Performance of Geocell Reinforced Sand Under a Square Footing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of the experimental testing program was carried out to determine the influence of cell geometry and multi-layer system on the behaviour of a square footing resting on geocell reinforced sand. Geocells made of three different PVC polymers of varying thickness and strength were used for testing purpose. Laboratory plate load tests were conducted to determine the pressure–settlement response of reinforced soil for different geometric parameters like diameter, height, depth of placement, and shape of the geocell. The effect of geocell material strength on load carrying capacity is also included in this paper. Performance comparison of single layer and multi-layer geocell reinforced sand with different spacing is also presented in this paper. The test results confirm that the reinforced sand layer shows an excellent improvement in bearing capacity in comparison with the unreinforced sand. The optimum geocell geometry to get maximum benefit in terms of bearing capacity were determined and presented in this paper. Optimum spacing for a two layer geocell system was also determined experimentally and presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM D638-14 Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. American Society For Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

  2. Bathrust RJ, Jarrett PM (1989) Large-scale model tests of geocomposite mattresses over peat subgrades. Transp Res Rec J 1188(1277):28–36

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 19(4):235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 19(8):529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dash SK, Sireesh S, Sitharam TG (2003) Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 21(4):197–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dash SK (2012) Effect of geocell type on load-carrying mechanisms of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. Int J Geomech 12(5):537–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedge A, Sitharam TG (2013) Experimental and numerical studies on footings supported on geocell reinforced sand and clay beds. Int J Geotech Eng 7(4):347–354

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hedge A, Sitharam TG (2015) Experimental and analytical studies on soft clay beds reinforced with bamboo cells and geocells. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1(2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  9. IS:1888 (1982) Method of load test on soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krishnaswamy N, Rajagopal K, Latha GM (2000) Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over a soft clay foundation. Geotech Test J 23(1):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lal D, Sankar N, Chandrakaran S (2017) Effect of reinforcement form on the behaviour of coir geotextile—reinforced sand beds. Soils Found 57(2):227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Latha GM, Somwanshi A (2009) Effect of reinforcement form on the bearing capacity of square footing on sand. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Latha GM, Dash SK, Rajagopal K (2009) Numerical simulation of the behavior of geocell-reinforced sand in foundations. Int J Geomech 9(4):143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sireesh S, Sitharam TG, Dash SK (2009) Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell–sand mattress overlying clay bed with void. Geotext Geomembr 27(2),89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2011) Model studies of a circular footing supported on geocell-reinforced clay. Can Geotech J 42(2) 693–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sitharam TG, Sireesh S (2005) Behavior of embedded footings supported on geogrid cell reinforced foundation beds. Geotech Test J 28(5):452–463

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2007) Performance of surface footing on geocell reinforced soft clay beds. Geotech Geol Eng 25(5):509–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tafreshi SNM, Dawson AR (2010) Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and planar forms of geotextile reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 28(1):72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tafreshi SNM, Dawson AR (2012) A comparison of static and cyclic loading responses of foundations on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 32:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wesseloo J, Visser AT, Rust E (2009) The stress–strain behavior of multiple cell geocell packs. Geotext Geomembr 27:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Sherin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sherin, K.S., Chandrakaran, S. & Sankar, N. Effect of Geocell Geometry and Multi-layer System on the Performance of Geocell Reinforced Sand Under a Square Footing. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 3, 20 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0097-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0097-3

Keywords

Navigation