Abstract
Literature about education in New Zealand and internationally over the past 30 years has increasingly focused on the need for effective school leadership. In New Zealand a major Best Evidence Synthesis study (BES 2009) led to an emphasis on instructional leadership aimed at raising achievement. This emphasis has tended to undervalue management, linked to the status quo rather than change and improvement. However, extended interviews with rural primary principals revealed they saw management as crucial to responding to parental concerns, handling disruption, and keeping the school ‘on track’. Making use of local knowledge and taking advice, they held the core responsibility for an observable response. These principals believed that managing issues helped them build and sustain the trust of the school community, which was of value ‘next time’. Thus, aspects of management combine the relational and context-dependent work of school principals. Drawing on Mintzberg (1990) we argue that the recognition and valuing of management aspect of school leadership is crucial for principal effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Child Youth and Family (CYF), founded in 1999, was the NZ government agency with legal powers to intervene in order to protect and help children who are being abused, neglected, or who have problem behaviour. It was replaced by a new Ministry for Vulnerable Children in April 2017 and then the Oranga Tamariki- Ministry for Children in 2018 after a change of Government.
References
Alcorn, N. (2011). Meat in the sandwich: The impact of changing policy contexts and local management of schools on principals’ work in New Zealand 1989–2009. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 8(2), 122–140.
Bass, B. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S.
Brinkmann, S. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 720–725.
Bryk, A., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Burns, J. M. (1998). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper and Row. (Originally published in 1978).
Denzin, N. K. (1994). Evaluating qualitative research in the poststructural moment: The lessons James Joyce teaches us. Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839940070401.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Devine, N., Stewart, G., & Benade, L. (2018). Yesterday’s policies for today’s schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 53(2), 161–163.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. (Reprinted 2015) Kappa Delta Pi lecture series [no. 10]. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
Duignan, P. (2012). Educational leadership: Together creating ethical learning environments (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Duke, D. L. (2018). Judgment and the preparation of educational leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117752455.
Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally a theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Earl Rinehart, K. (2017). Judging what they do: Formal, informal and self appraisal of New Zealand (rural) primary school principals. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Eisner, E. W. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism: Their form and functions in educational evaluation. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 10(3/4), 135–150.
Eisner, E. W. (1997). The new frontier in qualitative research methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300301.
Finley, S. (2003). Arts-based inquiry in QI: Seven years from crisis to guerrilla warfare. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800402250965
Grissom, J. A., & Loeb, S. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091–1123.
Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London, UK: Sage Publishing.
Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line. Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. London, UK: DfES and Nottingham: NCSL.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Kiwi leadership for principals: Principals as educational leaders. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
Mintzberg, H. (1990). The manager’s job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 163–176. (Original work published 1975).
Morris, J. (2014). The school leadership effect. The New Zealand education and scholarship trust. Wellington: The New Zealand initiative. Retrieved 21 Jan 2016 from https://nzinitiative.org.nz/dmsdocument/21
Murphy, J. (1988). Methodological, measurement, and conceptual problems in the study of instructional leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(2), 117–139.
Pierre, E. A. (2013). The appearance of data. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487862.
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing. A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., Lloyd, C., & New Zealand. Ministry of Education. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
Smyth, J. (2011). The disaster of the ‘self-managing school’—genesis, trajectory, undisclosed agenda, and effects. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43(2), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2011.560253.
Stone, A. G., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 25(3/4), 349–361.
Stronge, J. H. (1993). Defining the principalship: Instructional leader or middle manager? NASSP Bulletin, 77(553), 1–7.
Thrupp, M., & Willmot, R. (2003). Education management in managerialist times: Beyond the textual apologists. Maidenhead, Philadelphia: Open University Press
Wylie, C. (2012). Vital connections: Why we need more than self-managing schools. Wellington, NZ: NZCER Press.
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R. (2005). Why integrating the leading and managing roles is essential for organizational effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 361–375.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Earl Rinehart, K., Alcorn, N. Keeping Things on Track: School Principals as Managers. NZ J Educ Stud 54, 297–313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00140-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00140-5