Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Scale-Dependent Role of Biological Traits in Landscape Ecology: A Review

  • Scale-Measurement, Influence, and Integration (A Martin and J Holland, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Landscape Ecology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We describe current approaches that evaluate how the influence of species traits on the relationship between environmental variables and ecological responses varies among scales (i.e. the scale-dependent role of traits). We quantify which traits and ecological responses have been assessed, and discuss the main challenges associated with quantifying the scale-dependent effect of traits.

Recent Findings

We identify three main approaches used to evaluate the scale-dependent role of traits, based on whether 1) traits are used as predictors or responses, 2) intraspecific variation in single traits is considered, or 3) trait diversity indices are used. Our review identifies several gaps that include the following: 1) evidence of the scale-dependent role of traits is biased towards studies of plants; 2) we lack evidence of whether the traits of interacting species groups are consistently related across spatial scales; and 3) interactions between species traits and landscape structure are usually ignored.

Summary

The explicit inclusion of landscape structure effects in trait-based approaches at multiple scales will benefit the integration of approaches from community ecology and landscape ecology. This is important for describing the mechanisms that operate simultaneously across scales and for predicting the impact of landscape change on a broad range of ecological responses, including species diversity and interspecific interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miguet P, Jackson H, Jackson N, Martin A, Fahrig L. What determines the spatial extent of landscape effects on species? Landscape Ecology. 2016;31(6):1177–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0314-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levine JM. The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture. Ecology. 1992;73(6):1943–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson HB, Fahrig L. Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale? Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2015;24(1):52–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Bello F, Lavorel S, Lavergne S, Albert CH, Boulangeat I, Mazel F, et al. Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: a case study in the French Alps. Ecography. 2013;36(3):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07438.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mori AS, Furukawa T, Sasaki T. Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biological Reviews. 2013;88(2):349–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suding KN, Lavorel S, Chapin Iii FS, Cornelissen JHC, Diaz S, Garnier E, et al. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biology. 2008;14(5):1125–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luck GW, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Lumb K. Improving the application of vertebrate trait-based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2012;81(5):1065–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01974.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2006;21(4):178–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Messier J, McGill BJ, Lechowicz MJ. How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. Ecology Letters. 2010;13(7):838–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moran EV, Hartig F, Bell DM. Intraspecific trait variation across scales: implications for understanding global change responses. 2016. p. 137-50.

  11. De Bello F, Vandewalle M, Reitalu T, Lepš J, Prentice HC, Lavorel S, et al. Evidence for scale- and disturbance-dependent trait assembly patterns in dry semi-natural grasslands. Journal of Ecology. 2013;101(5):1237–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laughlin DC, Messier J. Fitness of multidimensional phenotypes in dynamic adaptive landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2015;30(8):487–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carmona CP, de Francesco B, Norman WHM, Jan L. Traits Without Borders: Integrating Functional Diversity Across Scales. Traits Without Borders: Integrating Functional Diversity Across Scales. 2016;31:382–94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Bello F, Janecek S, Leps J, Dolezal J, Mackova J, Lanta V, et al. Different plant trait scaling in dry versus wet Central European meadows. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2012;23(4):709–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01389.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chalmandrier L, Münkemüller T, Colace MP, Renaud J, Aubert S, Carlson BZ, et al. Spatial scale and intraspecific trait variability mediate assembly rules in alpine grasslands. Journal of Ecology. 2017;105(1):277–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McGarigal K, Wan H, Zeller K, Timm B, Cushman S. Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook. Landscape Ecology. 2016;31(6):1161–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0374-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gross N, Börger L, Soriano-Morales SI, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Quero JL, García-Gómez M, et al. Uncovering multiscale effects of aridity and biotic interactions on the functional structure of Mediterranean shrublands. Journal of Ecology. 2013;101(3):637–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cote J, Bestion E, Jacob S, Travis J, Legrand D, Baguette M. Evolution of dispersal strategies and dispersal syndromes in fragmented landscapes. Ecography. 2017;40(1):56–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson MJ, McTammany ME. Spatial scale and dispersal influence metacommunity dynamics of benthic invertebrates in a large river. Freshwater Science. 2016;35(2):738–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/685732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang J, Zhang GC, Ci XQ, Swenson NG, Cao M, Sha LQ, et al. Functional and phylogenetic assembly in a Chinese tropical tree community across size classes, spatial scales and habitats. Functional Ecology. 2014;28(2):520–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Bello F, Price JN, Münkemüller T, Liira J, Zobel K, Zobel M, et al. Functional species pool framework to test for biotic effects on community assembly. Ecology. 2012;93(10):2263–73. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1394.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bourgeois B, Gonzalez E, Vanasse A, Aubin I, Poulin M. Spatial processes structuring riparian plant communities in agroecosystems: implications for restoration. Ecological Applications. 2016;26(7):2103–15. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1368.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mokany K, Roxburgh SH. The importance of spatial scale for trait-abundance relations. Oikos. 2010;119(9):1504–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18411.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stirnemann I, Ikin K, Gibbons P, Blanchard W, Lindenmayer D. Measuring habitat heterogeneity reveals new insights into bird community composition. Oecologia. 2015;177(3):733–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3134-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ikin K, Barton PS, Stirnemann IA, Stein JR, Michael D, Crane M et al. Multi-Scale Associations between Vegetation Cover and Woodland Bird Communities across a Large Agricultural Region. Plos One. 2014;9(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097029.

  26. Akasaka M, Takada M, Kitagawa R, Igarashi H. Invasive non-native species attributes and invasion extent: examining the importance of grain size. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2012;23(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01332.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barnagaud JY, Papaïx J, Gimenez O, Svenning JC. Dynamic spatial interactions between the native invader Brown-headed Cowbird and its hosts. Diversity and Distributions. 2015;21(5):511–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Donadi S, van Der Heide T, Piersma T, van Der Zee EM, Weerman EJ, van de Koppel J, et al. Multi-scale habitat modification by coexisting ecosystem engineers drives spatial separation of macrobenthic functional groups. Oikos. 2015;124(11):1502–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilroy JJ, Medina Uribe CA, Haugaasen T, Edwards DP. Effect of scale on trait predictors of species responses to agriculture. Conservation Biology. 2015;29(2):463–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Violle C, Enquist BJ, McGill BJ, Jiang L, Albert CH, Hulshof C, et al. The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2012;27(4):244–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cattarino L, McAlpine CA, Rhodes JR. Spatial scale and movement behaviour traits control the impacts of habitat fragmentation on individual fitness. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2016;85(1):168–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaiser A, Merckx T, Van Dyck H. The Urban Heat Island and its spatial scale dependent impact on survival and development in butterflies of different thermal sensitivity. Ecology and Evolution. 2016;6(12):4129–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ryder JJ, Pastok D, Hoare MJ, Bottery MJ, Boots M, Knell RK, et al. Spatial variation in food supply, mating behavior, and sexually transmitted disease epidemics. Behavioral Ecology. 2013;24(3):723–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Aguiar FC, Cerdeira JO, Martins MJ, Ferreira MT. Riparian forests of Southwest Europe: are functional trait and species composition assemblages constrained by environment? Journal of Vegetation Science. 2013;24(4):628–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Carmona CP, Azcárate FM, Bello F, Ollero HS, Lepš J, Peco B. Taxonomical and functional diversity turnover in Mediterranean grasslands: interactions between grazing, habitat type and rainfall. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2012;49(5):1084–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02193.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Boiffin J, Aubin I, Munson AD. Ecological controls on post-fire vegetation assembly at multiple spatial scales in eastern North American boreal forests. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2015;26(2):360–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Concepcion ED, Moretti M, Altermatt F, Nobis MP, Obrist MK. Impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity: the role of species mobility, degree of specialisation and spatial scale. Oikos. 2015;124(12):1571–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Brice MH, Pellerin S, Poulin M. Environmental filtering and spatial processes in urban riparian forests. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2016;27(5):1023–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Laliberte E, Norton DA, Scott D. Contrasting effects of productivity and disturbance on plant functional diversity at local and metacommunity scales. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2013;24(5):834. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mayfield MM, Bonser SP, Morgan JW, Aubin I, McNamara S, Vesk PA. What does species richness tell us about functional trait diversity? Predictions and evidence for responses of species and functional trait diversity to land-use change. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2010;19(4):423–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00532.x.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Concostrina-Zubiri L, Pescador DS, Martinez I, Escudero A. Climate and small scale factors determine functional diversity shifts of biological soil crusts in Iberian drylands. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2014;23(7):1757–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0683-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Donner DM, Anderson D, Eklund D. St. Pierre M. Large-scale forest composition influences northern goshawk nesting in Wisconsin. Journal of Wildlife Management. 2013;77(3):495–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Craven D, Filotas E, Angers VA, Messier C. Evaluating resilience of tree communities in fragmented landscapes: linking functional response diversity with landscape connectivity. Diversity and Distributions. 2016;22(5):505–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kazakou E, Violle C, Roumet C, Navas ML, Vile D, Kattge J, et al. Are trait-based species rankings consistent across data sets and spatial scales? Journal of Vegetation Science. 2014;25(1):235–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Spasojevic MJ, Turner BL, Myers JA. When does intraspecific trait variation contribute to functional beta-diversity? Journal of Ecology. 2016;104(2):487–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo MS, Bürger R, Levine JM, Novak M, et al. Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2011;26(4):183–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ewers RM, Didham RK. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews. 2006;81(1):117–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kosydar AJ, Conquest LL, Tewksbury JJ. Can life histories predict the effects of habitat fragmentation? a meta-analysis with terrestrial mammals. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2014;12(2):505–21. https://doi.org/10.1566/aeer/1202_505521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bregman TP, Sekercioglu CH, Tobias JA. Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: Implications for ecosystem function and conservation. Biological Conservation. 2014;169:372–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ries L, Sisk TD. What is an edge species? The implications of sensitivity to habitat edges. Oikos. 2010;119(10):1636-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18414.x.

  51. Delattre T, Baguette M, Burel F, Stevens VM, Quénol H, Vernon P. Interactive effects of landscape and weather on dispersal. Oikos. 2013;122(11):1576–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00123.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Prokopenko CM, Boyce MS, Avgar T. Extent-dependent habitat selection in a migratory large herbivore: road avoidance across scales. Landscape Ecology. 2017;32(2):313–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0451-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. van Beest FM, Rivrud IM, Loe LE, Milner JM, Mysterud A. What determines variation in home range size across spatiotemporal scales in a large browsing herbivore? Journal of Animal Ecology. 2011;80(4):771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01829.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Akasaka T, Akasaka M, Nakamura F. Scale-independent significance of river and riparian zones on three sympatric Myotis species in an agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation. 2012;145(1):15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.08.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lauterbach D, Romermann C, Jeltsch F, Ristow M. Factors driving plant rarity in dry grasslands on different spatial scales: a functional trait approach. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2013;22(10):2337–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0455-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Moran-Ordonez A, Pavlova A, Pinder AM, Sim L, Sunnucks P, Thompson RM, et al. Aquatic communities in arid landscapes: local conditions, dispersal traits and landscape configuration determine local biodiversity. Diversity and Distributions. 2015;21(10):1230–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Moreira B, Tavsanoglu Ç, Pausas J. Local versus regional intraspecific variability in regeneration traits. Oecologia. 2012;168(3):671–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2127-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Garnier E, Lavorel S, Ansquer P, Castro H, Cruz P, Dolezal J, et al. Assessing the Effects of Land-use Change on Plant Traits, Communities and Ecosystem Functioning in Grasslands: A Standardized Methodology and Lessons from an Application to 11 European Sites. Annals of Botany. 2007;99(5):967–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Albert CH, Thuiller W, Yoccoz NG, Douzet R, Aubert S, Lavorel S. A multi-trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra- vs. interspecific variability in plant traits. Functional Ecology. 2010;24(6):1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01727.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Spasojevic MJ, Suding KN. Inferring community assembly mechanisms from functional diversity patterns: the importance of multiple assembly processes. Journal of Ecology. 2012;100(3):652–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01945.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Belmaker J, Jetz W. Spatial Scaling of Functional Structure in Bird and Mammal Assemblages. American Naturalist. 2013;181(4):464–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/669906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Stanko M, Morand S, Mouillot D. Assembly rules of ectoparasite communities across scales: combining patterns of abiotic factors, host composition, geographic space, phylogeny and traits. Ecography. 2015;38(2):184–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Perovic D, Gamez-Virues S, Borschig C, Klein AM, Krauss J, Steckel J, et al. Configurational landscape heterogeneity shapes functional community composition of grassland butterflies. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2015;52(2):505–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Gunton RM, Poyry J. Scale-specific spatial density dependence in parasitoids: a multi-factor meta-analysis. Functional Ecology. 2016;30(9):1501–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Green SJ, Côté IM. Trait-based diet selection: prey behaviour and morphology predict vulnerability to predation in reef fish communities. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2014;83(6):1451–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gothe E, Angeler DG, Sandin L. Metacommunity structure in a small boreal stream network. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2013;82(2):449–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Morante JC, Arroyo-Rodriguez V, Faria D. Patterns and predictors of beta-diversity in the fragmented Brazilian Atlantic forest: a multiscale analysis of forest specialist and generalist birds. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2016;85(1):240–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Eklöf A, Jacob U, Kopp J, Bosch J, Castro-Urgal R, Chacoff NP, et al. The dimensionality of ecological networks. Ecology Letters. 2013;16(5):577–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Morales-Castilla I, Matias MG, Gravel D, Araújo MB. Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 30(6):347–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.014.

  70. Dehling DM, Topfer T, Schaefer HM, Jordano P, Bohning-Gaese K, Schleuning M. Functional relationships beyond species richness patterns: trait matching in plant-bird mutualisms across scales. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2014;23(10):1085–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Butterfield BJ, Suding KN. Single-trait functional indices outperform multi-trait indices in linking environmental gradients and ecosystem services in a complex landscape. Journal of Ecology. 2013;101(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhu L, Fu B, Zhu H, Wang C, Jiao L, Zhou J. Trait choice profoundly affected the ecological conclusions drawn from functional diversity measures. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):3643. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03812-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Kattge J, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, Bönisch G, et al. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology. 2011;17(9):2905–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Salguero-Gómez R, Jones OR, Archer CR, Buckley YM, Che-Castaldo J, Caswell H, et al. The compadre Plant Matrix Database: an open online repository for plant demography. Journal of Ecology. 2015;103(1):202–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, De La Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W. EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world's birds and mammals. Ecology. 2014;95(7):2027. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1917.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wood SA, Russell R, Hanson D, Williams RJ, Dunne JA. Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure. Ecology and Evolution. 2015;5(17):3769–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1640.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Kissling WD, Dormann CF, Groeneveld J, Hickler T, Kühn I, McInerny GJ, et al. Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents. Journal of Biogeography. 2012;39(12):2163–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02663.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Stouffer DB, Bascompte J. Understanding food-web persistence from local to global scales. Ecology letters. 2010;13(2):154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01407.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Anderson KE, Inouye BD, Underwood N. Can inducible resistance in plants cause herbivore aggregations? Spatial patterns in an inducible plant/herbivore model. Ecology. 2015;96(10):2758–70. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1697.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Nash KL, Graham NAJ, Jennings S, Wilson SK, Bellwood DR. Herbivore cross-scale redundancy supports response diversity and promotes coral reef resilience. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2016;53(3):646–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Spasojevic MJ, Bahlai CA, Bradley BA, Butterfield BJ, Tuanmu MN, Sistla S, et al. Scaling up the diversity-resilience relationship with trait databases and remote sensing data: the recovery of productivity after wildfire. Global Change Biology. 2016;22(4):1421–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Martinez OJA, Fremier AK, Gunter S, Bendana ZR, Vierling L, Galbraith SM, et al. Scaling up functional traits for ecosystem services with remote sensing: concepts and methods. Ecology and Evolution. 2016;6(13):4359–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Peringer A, Schulze KA, Stupariu I, Stupariu MS, Rosenthal G, Buttler A, et al. Multi-scale feedbacks between tree regeneration traits and herbivore behavior explain the structure of pasture-woodland mosaics. Landscape Ecology. 2016;31(4):913–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0308-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mitchell MGE, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A. Linking Landscape Connectivity and Ecosystem Service Provision: Current Knowledge and Research Gaps. Ecosystems. 2013;16(5):894–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, et al. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecology Letters. 2009;12(1):22–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01255.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP130100218) and a Colombian Ministry of Education (COLCIENCIAS 529) scholarship to A.F.S.C. Martine Maron is supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT140100516).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Andrés Felipe Suárez-Castro, Jeremy S. Simmonds, Matthew G. E. Mitchell, Martine Maron & Jonathan R. Rhodes

  2. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Andrés Felipe Suárez-Castro, Jeremy S. Simmonds, Matthew G. E. Mitchell, Martine Maron & Jonathan R. Rhodes

  3. Institute for Resources, Environment & Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Matthew G. E. Mitchell

Authors
  1. Andrés Felipe Suárez-Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy S. Simmonds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew G. E. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martine Maron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jonathan R. Rhodes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Felipe Suárez-Castro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Scale-Measurement, Influence, and Integration

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suárez-Castro, A.F., Simmonds, J.S., Mitchell, M.G.E. et al. The Scale-Dependent Role of Biological Traits in Landscape Ecology: A Review. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep 3, 12–22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-018-0031-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-018-0031-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation