Skip to main content
Log in

The Developmental Sources of South Korean Neoliberalism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do South Korea’s developmental legacies influence its contemporary political economy? The discourse surrounding this question has tended to diverge over the extent to which South Korea’s state-led developmental model has been supplanted by a market-led, neoliberal mode of political-economic organization. Though this debate has indeed fostered many important individual contributions, it has also yielded a muddled and ambiguous theoretical landscape. To clarify this cluttered terrain, this paper draws from recent advances in the study of neoliberalism to establish critical points of consonance between statist perspectives on Korean development and neoliberalism. To this end, it identifies key threads of continuity binding South Korea’s developmental past with its neoliberal present. The paper finds that critical aspects of the developmental state’s interaction with society, from coercion to ideological suasion, furnished elemental building blocks to those actively constructing a South Korean neoliberalism. Thus, exploring these historical contours produces a fresh means for apprehending the interactions of enduring statist developmental legacies with contemporary neoliberal reforms, both theoretically and empirically. As such, this study yields an improved set of conceptual tools for grasping the complex empirical phenomena shaping the interplay of neoliberalism, developmentalism, and democracy within contemporary South Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Quoted in Jwa (2017, P.94).

  2. It bears mentioning here that given the extremely low initial baseline, the welfare system in Korea has certainly 'expanded' over the last several decades. For detailed explorations of these changes see, Kwon 2003; Peng 2011; Yang 2017. Nonetheless, the outlook adopted here joins those emphasizing the continued anemic nature of Korea’s welfare system that persists despite these reforms.

  3. Notably, supply side policy devices were not at all alien to the Korean development model as Jae-jin Yang (2017, pp. 43–44) describes tax cuts in the early 1970s as “Reaganomics before Reagan” which shored up a “low tax regime” and “significantly constrained the expansion of the public social security system.”.

  4. This insight can be traced back to Polanyi’s (1957) Great Transformation which offers a thoroughgoing account of the state’s role in effectuating the underlying conditions needed to create and maintain a ‘national market’.

  5. In Jackson’s (2012, p. 68) exploration of Hayek’s relationship with Walter Lippmann he quotes from a letter Lippmann wrote to Hayek noting that in the index of The Constitution of Liberty he was “puzzled to find that you have one reference to the corporation and nineteen references to labor unions. Does this mean that the index is at fault, or can it be that you think the corporation and its problems rate less than one page in a treatise of this kind?”.

References

  • Ahn, B.Y. 2008. Globalization and welfare reform in South Korea under the Kim Dae Jung government. In Korea Confronts Globalization, ed. Yunshik Chang, Seok Hyun-ho and Don Baker, 229–249. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Amsden, A.H. 1989. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A.H 1994. The spectre of Anglo-saxonization is haunting South Korea. In Korea's political economy: An institutional perpesctive, ed. Lee-Jay Cho and Yoon Hyung Kim, 87–126. Boulder: Westview Press.

  • An, C.-B., and B. Bosworth. 2013. Income inequality in Korea: an analysis of trends, causes, and answers. Vol. 354, Harvard East Asian Monographs. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Asia Center.

  • Cahill, D., M. Cooper, M. Konings, and D. Primrose. 2018. Introduction: Approaches to neoliberalism. In The Sage handbook of neoliberalism, ed. Damien Cahill, Melinda Cooper, Martijn Konings and David Primrose, xxv-xxxiii. London: SAGE.

  • Chang, D.-O. 2008. Capitalist development in Korea: Labour, capital and the myth of the developmental state. Vol. 16, Routledge Advances in Korean Studies. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Chang, H.-J. 1998. Korea: The misunderstood crisis. World Development 26 (8): 1555–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. 1999. The economic theory of the developmental state. In The developmental state, ed. Meredith Woo-Cumings, 182–199. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.-S. 2019. Developmental liberalism: Formation, degeneration, and transnationalization. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillian.

  • Chang, K.-S., L. Weiss, and B. Fine. 2012. Introduction: Neoliberlaism and developmental politics in perspective. In Developmental politics in transition: The neoliberal era and beyond, ed. Kyung-Sup. Chang, Ben Fine, and Linda Weiss, 1–26. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.J. 1993. Political cleaveges in South Korea. In State and society in contemporary Korea, ed. Hagen Koo, 13–50. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K., and Y.-k. Choi. 2010. Korea’s labor and social security policy responses during the korean crisis of 1998–2000. Seoul: Ministry of Strategy and Finance (MOSF), Republic of Korea; Korea Development Institute.

  • Dornbusch, R., and Y.C. Park. 1987. Korean growth policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987 (2): 389–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucette, J. 2015. Debating economic democracy in South Korea: The costs of commensurability. Critical Asian Studies 47 (3): 388–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.J. 1993. The South Korean bourgeoisie: A class in search of hegemony. In State and society in contemporary South Korea, ed. Hagen Koo, 95–130. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P.B. 1995. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation, Princeton paperbacks. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. 2014. Six theories of neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven 122(1):49–71

  • Gray, K. 2011. The social and geopolitical origins of state transformation: The case of South Korea. New Political Economy 16 (3): 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. 2018. Developmental states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hockmuth, K. 2018. South Korea’s developmental epoch: A new economic nationalism perspective. International Studies Review, 19(2), 33–59. 

  • Holliday, I. 2005. East Asian social policy in the wake of the financial crisis: Farewell to productivism? Policy and Politics 33 (1): 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundt, D. 2009. Korea's Developmental Alliance : State, Capital and the Politics of Rapid Development. London: London : New York : Routledge.

  • Hundt, D. 2015. Neoliberalism, the developmental state and civil society in Korea. Asian Studies Review 39 (3): 466–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundt, D., and J. Uttam. 2017. Varieties of capitalism in Asia: Beyond the developmental state. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B. 2012. Freedom, the common good, and the rule of law: Lippmann and Hayek on economic planning. Journal of the History of Ideas 73 (1): 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, K. 2005. Beyond institutional fetishism: From the developmental to the regulatory state. New Political Economy 10 (3): 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. 1994. What is the best system of national economic management for Korea? In Korea's political economy: An institutional perpesctive, ed. ee-Jay Cho and Yoon Hyung Kim, 63–86. Boulder: Westview Press.

  • Johnson, C. 1999. The developmental state: Odyssey of a concept. In The developmental state, ed. Meredith Woo-Cumings, 32–60. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jwa, S.-H. 2017. The rise and fall of Korea’s economic development. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski, T. 2009. The politics of market reforms: Korea’s path from chaebol republic to market democracy and back. Contemporary Politics 15 (3): 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M. 2011. Compressed modernization and the formation of a developmentalist mentalité. In Reassessing the Park Chung Hee Era, 1961-1979: Development, political thought, democracy, and cultural influence, ed. Hyung-A. Kim and Clark W. Sorensen, 166–186. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

  • Kang, W. 2016. Democratic performance and park Chung-Hee Nostalgia in Korean democracy. Asian Perspective 40 (1): 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.M. 2020. The Korean developmental state. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.S. 1991. The Korean economic miracle (1962–1980) Revisited: Myths and realities. Kellogg Institute (Working Paper #166):1–63.

  • Kim, S.-Y. 2017. Wither developmentalism after democratisation? In Routledge handbook of democratization in East Asia, ed. Tun-jen Cheng and Yun-han Chu, 457-470. Routledge.

  • Kim, T., H.-J. Kwon, J. Lee, and I. Yi. 2011. “Mixed Governance” and welfare in South Korea. Journal of Democracy 22 (3): 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.H. 1994. An introduction to the Korean model of political economy. In Korea's political economy: An institutional perpesctive, ed. Lee-Jay Cho and Yoon Hyung Kim, 45–62. Boulder: Westview Press.

  • Kim, K. J. 2006. The Development of Modern South Korea: State formation, capitalist development, and national identity. New York: Routledge.

  • Koo, H. 1999. Modernity in South Korea: An alternative narrative. Thesis Eleven 57 (1): 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, H. 2001. Korean workers: The culture and politics of class formation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, H. 2007. The changing faces of inequality in South Korea in the age of globalization. Korean Studies 31 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, H.-J. 2003. Advocacy coalitions and the politics of welfare in Korea after the economic crisis. Policy and Politics 31 (1): 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B.-H. 2015. Changing cross-movement coalitions between labor unions and civil society organizations in South Korea. Development and Society 44 (2): 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-J., and T. Han. 2006. The demise of “Korea, Inc.”: Paradigm shift in Korea’s developmental state. Journal of Contemporary Asia 36 (3): 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H.-C., and J.-H. Jang. 2006. Neo-liberalism in post-crisis South Korea: Social conditions and outcomes. Journal of Contemporary Asia 36 (4): 442–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini, S. 2019. Global development: A cold war history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. 2019. Capitalism, alone: The future of the system that rules the world. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minns, J. 2001. Of miracles and models: The rise and decline of the developmental state in South Korea. Third World Quarterly 22 (6, The Post-Cold War Predicament), pp 1025–1043.

  • Mirowski, P., and D. Plehwe. 2015. The road from mount Pelerin: The making of the neoloiberal thought collective. First Harvard University press paperback ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

  • Moon, S. 2005. Militarized modernity and gendered citizenship in South Korea, politics, history, and culture. Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.

  • Moon, S. 2009. The Cultural politics of remembering park Chung Hee. The Asia-Pacific Journal 7 (19): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, G.E. 1990. South Korea : Dissent within the economic miracle. Atlantic highlands, N.J.: Zed Books; Washington, D.C. : International Labor Rights Education and Research Fund.

  • Pak, S. 1998. Two forces of democratisation in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia 28 (1): 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, E.-S. 2000. The financial crisis of 1997–98 and the end of the Asian developmental state. Contemporary Southeast Asia 22 (3): 570–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.H. 1970. The country, the revolution, and I. 2d ed. ed. Seoul: Seoul: Hollym Corp.

  • Park, H.-J., and J. Doucette. 2016. Financialization or capitalization? Debating capitalist power in South Korea in the context of neoliberal globalization. Capital and Class 40 (3): 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y.S. 2011. The social welfare reform during the progressive regimes of South Korea: Theoretical implications. The Social Science Journal 48 (1): 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. 2010. Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., N. Brenner, and N. Theodore. 2018. Actually existing neoliberalism. In The Sage handbook of neoliberalism, ed. Damien Cahill, Melinda Cooper, Martijn Konings, and David Primrose, 3–15. London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, I. 2011. The good, the bad and the confusing: The political economy of social care expansion in South Korea. Development and Change 42 (4): 905–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, I. 2006. Economic crisis and the construction of a neo-liberal regulatory regime in Korea. Competition and Change 10 (1): 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, I. 2008. The Korean developmental state: From dirgisme to neo-liberalism. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistor, K. 2019. The code of capital: How law creates wealth and inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plehwe, D. 2015. The origins of the neoliberal economic development discourse. In The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective, ed. Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe, 238–279. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, S.K. 2018. Korea: Neoliberalism, state developmentalism, and people power. Situations 11 (2): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roh, J. 2013. Concern about the rise of lazy welfare queens? An empirical explanation of the underdevelopment of the redistributive welfare system in South Korea.

  • Rosenboim, O. 2017. The emergence of globalism: visions of world order in Britain and the United States, 1939–1950. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1999. Develoment as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodian, Q. 2018. Globalists: The end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H.-Y. 2019. From getting the development question wrong to bringing emancipation back in: Re-reading Alice Amsden. Development and Change 50(6):1554–1578.

  • Song, J. 2009. South Koreans in the debt crisis: The creation of a neoliberal welfare society. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Y. 2015. The neoliberals confront the trade unions. In The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective, ed. Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe, 181–203. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, C.-S., and S.-H. Kwon. 2014. Whither the developmental state in South Korea? Balancing welfare and neoliberalism. Asian Studies Review 38 (4): 676–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurbon, E. 2016. Developmental mindset: Revival of financial activism in South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Thurbon, E., and L. Weiss. 2006. Investing in openness: the evolution of fdi strategy in South Korea and Taiwan. New Political Economy 11 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Um, K., H.-C. Lim, and S.-M. Hwang. 2014. South Korea’s Developmental state at a crossroads: Disintegration or re-emergence. Korea Observer 45 (2): 211–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, R. 2015. Reinventing monopoly and the role of corporations: The roots of Chicago law and economics. In The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective, ed. Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe, 204–237. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V.J. 2001. The constitution of markets: essays in political economy. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. 1992. Review: East asia’s economic success: Conflicting perspectives, partial insights, shaky evidence. World Politics 44 (2): 270–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. 2004. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Second Paperback ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Wasserman, J. 2019. The marginal revolutionaries: How austrian economists fought the war of ideas. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. 2000. Developmental states in transition: Adapting, dismantling, innovating, not ‘Normalizing.’ The Pacific Review 13 (1): 21–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. 2004. The adaptive developmental state in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies 4 (3): 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo-Cumings, M. 1999. The state, democracy, and the reform of the corporate sector in Korea. In The politics of the Asian economic crisis, ed. T.J. Pempel, 116–142. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, J.-E. 1991. Race to the swift: State and finance in Korean industrialization: Columbia University Press.

  • Woo, M. 2011. A newly emerging small welfare state and social cleavage: The Korean case*. Korea Observer 42 (4): 645–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J.-J. 2017. The political economy of the small welfare state in South Korea. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. 2018. From miracle to mirage: The making and unmaking of the Korean middle class, 1960–2015. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A previous version of this paper was presented at the Northeastern Political Science Association conference in Philadelphia in November 2019. The author wishes to thank his fellow panelists at the conference, Nicolas Reynolds and Lowell Gustafson for their thoughtful comments and useful feedback. He also grateful to Joshua Leon for his valuable feedback and advice at various stages throughout the completion of the manuscript.

Funding

Research for this manuscript was supported by funding from the center for Research and Community Outreach Services (RCOS) at Akita International University. The author has no conflicts of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Hockmuth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hockmuth, K. The Developmental Sources of South Korean Neoliberalism. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 15, 41–61 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-021-00328-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-021-00328-4

Keywords

Navigation