Skip to main content
Log in

The Villainous Moor: Eleazar in Dekker’s Lust’s Dominion (1600)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article explores the disruptive social contexts and inter-racial relationships in Thomas Dekker’s Lust’s Dominion (c.1599–1600) [Collier found out about its original performance date, which was in February 1600, and that it was first published in 1657 (Collier 1827, p. 264)] with focus on the Moorish Eleazar. The play is about race, lust, revenge and politics. The Elizabethan experienced a cultural blend and a fear of Africans and other foreigners. Like Dekker, Elizabethan dramatists imparted well-known contemporary prejudices and stereotypes on those of specific origin in Africa based solely on their dark skin. Elizabethan shows reinforced the image of the Moor as cruel, tyrannical and deceitful. The African Moors are portrayed to the Elizabethan expectations as being demi-devil, deceitful, lascivious, unpleasant, merciless egotist as soon as he appears. The depiction of the evil Moor contributes to Elizabethan superiority as an intrinsic right. Dekker illustrates the pervasive racism of Elizabethan Europe and the plain consequences of this institutionalized prejudice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Jasper described Dekker as a “militant Protestant”. See her book on Dekker, The Dragon and the Dove (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1990), the introduction.

  2. The book was written originally in Arabic in 1526 (Bekkaoui (ed.) 1999, Lust’s Dominion, pp 20–62).

  3. Moriscos are known as Christianized Muslims from Iberia; see Gerald MacLean and Nabil Matar. Britain and the Islamic World 1558–1713. (Oxford University Press 2011), p. 85.

  4. See Nabil Matar, “Introduction: England and Mediterranean Captivity, 1577–1704,” Piracy, Slavery, and Redemption: Barbary Captivity Narratives from Early Modern England ed. Daniel J. Vitkus (New York: Columbia UP 2001), p. 1.

  5. The surviving portrait of the Moroccan ambassador to Queen Elizabeth on 15 June 1600, “Hamet Xarife,” as he was known in England, or “Abd al-Wahid bin Mas‘ood bin Mohammad Annouri,” is an evidence of liking.

  6. Bernard Harris corresponds to the literary availability of portraying Moors on London stage as “A Portrait of a Moor” in Shakespeare Survey (1958).

  7. Aphra Behn’s play, Abdelazar or The Moor's Revenge (1676), is an adaptation of the Dekker’s Lust's Dominion (1600).

  8. Dekker used historical Spanish characters to humiliate the Spanish State.

  9. See the discussion of Othello by Daniel Vitkus: “Turning Turk in Othello: The Conversion and Damnation of the Moor,” Shakespeare Quarterly, 48 (1997): 145–177.

  10. See Emily Bartels, “Too Many Blackamoors: Deportation, Discrimination, and Elizabeth I.” ESL 46.2. (Spring 2006): pp. 305–322.

References

  • Alhawamdeh, Hussein A. 2013. The different western perception of the oriental moor in the renaissance and the twentieth century: Shakespeare’s Othello and Tayeb Salih’s season of migration to the north: A post-colonial critique. Transnational Literature 5(2): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Emily. 2006. Too many Blackamoors: Deportation, discrimination, and Elizabeth I. ESL 46(2): 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy, Anthony. 1987. Black face maligned race: The representation of blacks in english drama from Shakespeare to Southerne. Baton Rouge and London: Louisiana State Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkaoui, Khalid (ed.). 1999. Thomas Dekker’s Lust’s Dominion. Fez, Morocco: Moroccan Cultural Studies Centre.

  • Best, George. 1926. A true discourse of the three voyages of discoverie, for the finding of a passage to Cathaya, by the northwest, under the conduct of Martin Frobisher Generall. In The principal navigations, voyages, traffiques and discover-ies of the English Nation (1600), vol. 8, ed. Richard Hakluyt, 170–276. London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, Samuel C. 1965. The Crescent and The Rose: Islam and England during the renaissance. New York: Octagon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, William B. 1980. The French encounter with Africans: White response to blacks 1530–1880. Bloomington, London: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J.P. (ed.). 1827. Dodsley’s a select collection of old plays, vol. II, London: Methuen, 311. p. 264.

  • Daniel, Norman. 1984. Heroes and Saracens: An interpretation of the Chansons de Geste. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, Jack. 1991. The Moor in english renaissance drama. Tampa: University of South Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, Uddalak. 2013. Representation of race in four Shakespearean Plays: Titus Andronicus, Othello, Antony and Cleopatra, The Merchant of Venice European academic Research I. 924–925.

  • Everett, Barbara. 1982. “Spanish” Othello; the making of Shakespeare’s Moor. Shakespeare Survey 35: 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, George. 1971. The black image in the white mind. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, George. 2002. Racism: A short history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, Julia. 1990. The dragon and the dove. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildon, Charles. 1719. The life and strange surprizing adventures of Mr. D— de F–, of London, Hosier, Who Has Liv’D Above Fifty Years by Himself, in the Kingdoms of North and South Britain. London: J. Roberts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, Imtiaz. 2000. Shakespeare and race: Postcolonial Praxis in the early modern period. Lanham and New York: Univ. Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, B. 2000. A portrait of a Moor. In Shakespeare and Race, ed. S. Wells, and C.M.S. Alexander, 23–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, K. 1978. Elizabethans and foreigners. Othello and colour prejudice. Dramatic identities and cultural traditions: Studies in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Eldred. 1965. Othello’s countrymen: The African in english renaissance drama. London: Oxford U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Eldred D. 1971. The Elizabethan image of Africa. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanyak, Debra, and Walter S.H. Lim (eds.). 2010. The english renaissance, orientalism and the idea of Asia. Macmillan: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitishat, Amal Riyadh. 2012. The image of Muslims in the Elizabethan Drama. Research Journal of social Science and Management 1(9): 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo Africanus, John. 1896. The history and description of Africa and of the notable things therein contained, written try Al-Hassan Ibn-Mohammed Al-Wezaz Al-Fasi, a Moor, Baptised as Giovanni Leone, but better knoum as Ijeo Africanus. In Done into english in the Year 1600, by John Pory. Hakluyt society, 1st series, vol. 3, ed. Robert Brown. New York: Burt Franklin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomba, Ania. 1992. Gender, race, renaissance drama. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. 1995. Race. In A companion to American thought, ed. R.W. Fox, and J. Klopperman, 564–567. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macionis, J., and K. Plummer. 2012. Sociology: A global introduction, 5th ed. Har-low: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, Gerald, and Nabil Matar. 2011. Britain and the Islamic World 1558–1713. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matar, Nabil. 1999. Turks, Moors and Englishmen in the age of discovery. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matar, Nabil. 2009. The 1609 expulsion of the Moriscos in early modern British thought. Explorations in Renaissance Culture 35(2009): 132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazimhaka, Jolly Rwanyonga. 1997. The discourse of difference: The representation of Black African characters in english renaissance drama. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

  • Mignolo, Walter D. 2010. Islamophobia and Hispanophobia: How they came together in the Euro-American imagination. Arches Quarterly 4(7): 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. 1992. The name “Negro”: Its origin and evil use. Baltimore: Black classic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, Nasar. 2012. Racialization and religion: Race, culture and difference in the study of anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. Ethnic and Racial Studies 12: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Miri. 2013. Challenging a culture of racial equivalence. MIM Working Papers Series 13(5): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallybrass, Peter, and Allon White. 1986. The poetics and politics of transgression. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, James M. 2010. The racial formation of medieval Jews: A challenge to the field. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33(10): 1737–1755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokson, Elliot. 1982. The popular image of the black man in english drama, 1550–1688. Boston: G.K. Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, V.M. 1994. Othello: A contextual history. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitkus, Daniel. 1997. Turning Turk in Othello: The conversion and damnation of the Moor. Shakespeare Quarterly 48: 145–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitkus, Daniel (ed.). 2001. Piracy, slavery, and redemption: Barbary captivity narratives from early modern England. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitkus, Daniel. 2003. Turning Turk: English theater and the multicultural Mediterranean, 1570–1630. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, V. 1991. Historical differences: Misogyny and Othello. In The matter of difference: Materialist feminist criticism of Shakespeare, ed. V. Wayne, 153–179. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahd Mohammed Taleb Saeed Al-Olaqi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Olaqi, F.M.T.S. The Villainous Moor: Eleazar in Dekker’s Lust’s Dominion (1600). Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 10, 69–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-016-0128-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-016-0128-9

Keywords

Navigation