Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Utility of a Function-Based Approach to Intimate Partner Violence and Gender Bias in Family Courts

  • Special Section: Diversity and Inclusion
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) is alarmingly high. Leaving an abusive relationship is only part of the solution, especially for survivors who share children with a violent partner. The IPV survivor has to navigate the family court system in order to obtain protection orders and custody arrangements. The decisions made by judges in family courts are influenced by gender-biased theories that rely on myths about women, intimate domestic violence, and the effects of violence and abuse on children. This paper will describe current issues in family court and possible contributions that behavior analysts can provide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbot, B. B., & Badia, P. (1984). Preference for signaled over unsignaled shock schedules: Ruling out asymmetry and response fixation as factors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, R., & Greaney, J. (1989). Report of the gender bias study of the Supreme Judicial Court [of Massachusetts]. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., Hutchinson, R. R., & Hake, D. F. (1967). Attack, avoidance, and escape reactions to aversive shock. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 131–148.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., . . . Stevens, M. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf.

  • Bond, R. (2007). The lingering debate over the parental alienation syndrome phenomenon. Journal of Child Custody, 4(1–2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1300/j190v04n01_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonem, M., Stanley-Kime, K. L., & Corbin, M. (2008). A behavioral approach to understanding domestic violence: A functional assessment based on batterer-identified contingencies. The Journal of Behavior Analysis of Offender and Victim Treatment and Prevention, 1(2), 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, C. S. (2001). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Getting it wrong in child custody cases. Family Law Quarterly, 35(3), 527–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Infographic based on data from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 state report. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-infographic-2016.pdf.

  • Cherek, D. R., & Pickens, R. (1970). Schedule-induced aggression as a function of fixed-ratio value. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 309–311.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dallam, S. J. (1999). Parental alienation syndrome: Is it scientific? In E. S. Charles & L. Crook (Eds.), Expose: The failure of family courts to protect children from abuse in custody disputes. Our Children Our Children Charitable Foundation: Los Gatos, CA Retrieved from http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/3.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallam, S. J., & Silberg, J. L. (2006). Myths that place children at risk during custody disputes. Sexual Assault Report, 9(3), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallam, S. J., & Silberg, J. L. (2016). Recommended treatments for “parental alienation syndrome” (PAS) may cause children foreseeable and lasting psychological harm. Journal of Child Custody, 13(2–3), 134–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danforth, G., & Welling, B. (Eds.). (1996). Achieving equal justice for women and men in the California courts: Final report. Judicial Council of California Advisory Committee on Gender Bias in the Courts.

  • Dore, M. K. (2004). The “friendly parent” concept: A flawed factor for child custody. Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 6, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragiewicz, M. (2010). Gender bias in the courts: Implications for battered mothers and their children. In M. Hannah & B. Goldstein (Eds.), Domestic violence, abuse, and child custody: Legal strategies and policy issues (§§ 5.1–5.18). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Bodnarchuk, M. (2005). Through a psychological lens: Personality disorder and spouse assault. In D. Loseke, R. Gelles, & M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (2nd ed., pp. 5–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edleson, J. L. (1999). Children’s witnessing of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 839–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2005). A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: Limited science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1), 1–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, P. J. (2010). Parental alienation syndrome. In M. Hannah & B. Goldstein (Eds.), Domestic violence, abuse, and child custody: Legal strategies and policy issues (§§ 12.1–12.8). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, R., Smith, E. L. P., & Ellis, B. B. (1977). The effects of two response-elimination procedures on reinforced and induced aggression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 5–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Freyd, J. J. (1997). Violations of power, adaptive blindness, and betrayal trauma theory. Feminism and Psychology, 7, 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, A. M., & Reichman, L. M. (2005). Representing children in civil cases involving domestic violence. Family Law Quarterly, 39(1), 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodmark, L. (2011). State, national, and international legal initiatives to address violence against women. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, E. R., Tarbox, J., & Coyne, L. (2018). Evaluating the effects of acceptance and commitment training on the overt behavior of parents of children with autism. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Edelson, J. L. (2002). Domestic violence in the lives of children: The future of research, intervention and social policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, J. L., & Chung, G. H. (2006). Intimate partner violence, parental divorce, and child custody: Directions for intervention and future research. Family Relations, 55(2), 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, L. E., Baron, A., & Kaufman, A. (1968). Temporal variables in the acquisition of human free-operant avoidance of “time out.”. Psychonomic Science, 10, 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holz, W. C., & Azrin, N. H. (1961). Discriminative properties of punishment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 225–232.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, R. R., Azrin, N. H., & Hunt, G. M. (1968). Attack produced by intermittent reinforcement of a concurrent operant response. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 489–495.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. G., & Crooks, C. V. (2007). Assessing the best interests of the children. In J. L. Edleson & O. J. Williams (Eds.), Parenting by men who batter: New directions for assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellum, K. K., Hayes, L. J., & Ghezzi, P. M. (2000). A preliminary analysis of responding by abused partners. Paper presented at the 19th annual convention for the California Association for Behavior Analysis, Redondo Beach, CA.

  • Kitzmann, K. M., Gaylord, N. K., Holt, A. R., & Kenny, E. D. (2003). Child witnesses to domestic violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 339–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, J. F. (1970). Aggression during the fixed-ratio and extinction components of a multiple schedule of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 221–231.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Landaburu, H., & Ghezzi, P. M. (2003). Intimate domestic violence: A behavior analytic perspective. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Convention of the California Association for Behavior Analysis, Newport Beach, CA.

  • Leaf, R. C. (1965). Acquisition of Sidman avoidance responding as a function of S-S interval. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 59, 298–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M. B., & Stahly, G. B. (1993). Domestic violence and child custody. In M. Hansen & M. Harway (Eds.), Battering and family therapy: A feminist perspective (pp. 175–187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, J. S. (2013). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: A research review. Retrieved on September 11, 2017, from http://www.vawnet.org.

  • Meier, J. S., & Dickson, S. (2017). Mapping gender: Shedding empirical light on family courts’ treatment of cases involving abuse and alienation. Law & Inequality, 35, 310–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milchman, M. S. (2017). Misogynistic cultural argument in parental alienation versus child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Child Custody, 14(4), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2017.1416722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. L. (1995). Eliminating the battering of women by men: Some considerations for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 493–507.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohue, W., Benuto, L. T., & Bennett, N. (2016). Examining the validity of parental alienation syndrome. Journal of Child Custody, 13, 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. A., Francis, M. J., Francis, J., & Schneiderman, N. (1972). Shock-induced aggression as a function of prior experience with avoidance, fighting, or unavoidable shock. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 323–332.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, G. S., Catania, A. C., & Skinner, B. F. (1963). Conditioned and unconditioned aggression in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 73–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rotgers, F., & Barrett, D. (1996). Daubert v. Merrell Dow and expert testimony by clinical psychologists: Implications and recommendations for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27(5), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.27.5.467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (2007). Child custody and visitation decisions in domestic violence cases: Legal trends, risk factors, and safety concerns. Minneapolis, MN: National Resource Center on Domestic Violence Retrieved from http://new.vawnet.org/category/Main_Doc.php?docid=1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D., Faller, K., & Tolman, R. (2012). Custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations, 2009–2010 [United States]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30962.v1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1966). Avoidance behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (2000). Coercion and its fallout (Rev. ed.). Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., & Boren, J. J. (1957). The relative aversiveness of warning signal and shock in an avoidance situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinazzola, J., Ford, J. D., Zucker, M., van der Kolk, B. A., Silva, S., Smith, S. F., et al. (2005). Survey evaluates complex trauma exposure, outcome, and intervention among children and adolescents. Psychiatric Annals, 35, 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Report sponsored by the National Institute of Justice.

  • Trocme, N., & Bala, N. (2005). False allegations of abuse and neglect when parents separate. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29(12), 1333–1345.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. E., Stachnik, T. J., Brierton, G. R., & Mabry, J. H. (1966). Fighting and avoidance in response to aversive stimulation. Behavior, 26, 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E., & Shapiro, D. L. (2010). Parental alienation disorder: Why label children with a mental diagnosis? Journal of Child Custody, 7, 266–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. A., Crooks, V. L., McIntyre-Smith, A., & Jaffe, P. G. (2004). The effects of children’s exposure to domestic violence: A meta-analysis and critique. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2012).

  • Zorza, J. (1992). Friendly parent provision in custody determination. Clearinghouse Review, 26(8), 924.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Behavior Analysis, Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 401 West A Street #180, San Diego, CA, 92101, USA

    Heidi J. Eilers

Authors
  1. Heidi J. Eilers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi J. Eilers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies done with human participants performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eilers, H.J. The Utility of a Function-Based Approach to Intimate Partner Violence and Gender Bias in Family Courts. Behav Analysis Practice 12, 869–878 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00383-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00383-0

Search

Navigation