Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating Three Methods of Stimulus Rotation when Teaching Receptive Labels

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The teaching of receptive labels (i.e., auditory-visual conditional discriminations) is common among early intervention programs for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Discrete trial teaching (DTT) is a common approach used to teach these receptive labels. Some have argued that the stimuli within the array, target and non-target, must be counterbalanced to prevent the development of undesired stimulus control. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to stimulus rotation to teach receptive labels to five young children diagnosed with ASD. These approaches included counterbalanced, fixed, and clinician’s choice. The results of an adapted alternating treatment design replicated across three stimulus sets and five participants indicated that all three methods of rotation were effective. Maintenance and generalization for targets taught in all three conditions was also assessed. The implications of the results with respect to current teaching practices in early intervention programs are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. (1968). The token economy: a motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation. Appleton-Century.

  • Conallen, K., & Reed, P. (2016). A teaching procedure to help children with autistic spectrum disorder to label emotions. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 23, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delfs, C. H., & Frampton, S. E. (2014). Practical implications of evaluating the efficiency of listener and tact instruction for children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 810–813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). Minneapolis: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grow, L. L., & Hijde, R. (2017). A comparison of procedures for teaching receptive labeling of sight words to a child with autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grow, L. L., Carr, J. E., Kodak, T. M., Jostad, C. M., & Kisamore, A. N. (2011). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 475–498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grow, L. L., Kodak, T., & Carr, J. E. (2014). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 600–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grow, L., & LeBlanc, L. (2013). Teaching receptive language skills: recommendations for instructors. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6, 56–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, A., Jr., Hale, M. N., O’Brien, H. A., Fischer, A. J., Durocher, J. S., & Alessandri, M. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of two commonly used discrete trial procedures for teaching receptive discrimination to young children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 630–638.

  • Heckaman, K. A., Alber, S., Hooper, S., & Heward, W. L. (1998). A comparison of least-to-most prompts and progressive time delay on the disruptive behavior of students with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2010). Acquisition of intraverbal behavior: teaching children with autism to mand for answers to questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, L. A. (2014). Early intervention for young children with autism: Best practices for receptive language instruction. Workshop presented at the Ninth Annual Association for Behavior Analysis International Autism Conference. Las Vegas, NV.

  • Leaf, J. B. (2012). An experimental approach for selecting a response-prompting strategy for children with developmental disabilities: a reply to Gast. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 5, 226–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, J. B., Cihon, J. H., Alcalay, A., Mitchell, E., Townley-Cochran, D., Miller, K., Leaf, R., Taubman, M., & McEachin, J. (2017). Instructive feedback embedded within group instruction for children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 304–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, J. B., Cihon, J. H., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., & Taubman, M. (2016a). A progressive approach to discrete trial teaching: some current guidelines. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9, 361–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, J. B., Cihon, J. H., Townley-Cochran, D., Miller, K., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., & Taubman, M. (2016b). An evaluation of positional prompts for teaching receptive identification to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 349–363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, J. B., Leaf, J. A., Alcalay, A., Kassardjian, A., Tsuji, K., Dale, S., Ravid, D., Taubman, M., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R. (2016c). Comparison of most-to-least prompting to flexible prompt fading for children with autism spectrum disorder. Exceptionality, 24, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., Leaf, J. A., Alcalay, A., Ravid, D., Dale, S., et al. (2016d). Comparing paired-stimulus preference assessments with in-the-moment reinforcer analysis on skill acquisition: a preliminary investigation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication, 33, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616645329.

  • Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., Taubman, M., Ala’i-Rosales, S., Ross, R. K., et al. (2016e). Applied behavior analysis is a science and, therefore, progressive. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 720–731.

  • Leaf, R. B., & McEachin, J. J. (1999). A work in progress: behavior management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism. New York: Different Roads to Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, R. B., Taubman, M. T., McEachin, J. J., Leaf, J. B., & Tsuji, K. H. (2011). A program description of a community-based intensive behavioral intervention program for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, D. C., Valentino, A. L., & Leblanc, L. A. (2016). Discrete trial training. In R. Lang, T. B. Hancock, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder (pp. 47–83). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Libby, M. E., Weiss, J. S., Bancroft, S., & Ahearn, W. H. (2008). A comparison of most-to-least and least-to-most prompting on acquisition of solitary play skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 37–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: the Me Book. Austin: PRO-ED Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: basic intervention techniques. Austin: PRO-ED Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDuff, G. S., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism. In C. Maurice, G. Green, & R. M. Foxx (Eds.), Making a difference behavioral intervention for autism (pp. 37–50). Austin: Pro Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N., & Brownell, R. (2011). Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Novato: ATP Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda-Linné, F., & Melin, L. (1992). Acquisition, generalization, and spontaneous use of color adjectives: a comparison of incidental teaching and traditional discrete-trial procedures for children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 191–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzolo-Gomez, R., Leonard, M. A., Ortiz, E., Rivera, C. M., & Greer, R. D. (2002). Teaching children with autism to prefer books or toys over stereotypy or passivity. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., & Shapiro, S. K. (2014). Increasing social approach and decreasing social avoidance in children with autism spectrum disorder during discrete trial training. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1443–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1992). Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 173–182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Soluaga, D., Leaf, J. B., Taubman, M., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R. (2008). A comparison of flexible prompt fading and constant time delay for five children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 753–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (survey form). Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, M., Brierley, S., Wishner, J., Baker, D., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R. B. (2001). The effectiveness of a group discrete trial instructional approach for preschoolers with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 205–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. (2008). Constant and progressive time delay procedures for teaching children with autism: a literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 261–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Effective and efficient procedures for the transfer of stimulus control. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 52–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Autism Partnership Foundation, 200 Marina Drive, Seal Beach, CA, 90740, USA

    Justin B. Leaf, Joseph H. Cihon, Julia L. Ferguson, John McEachin, Ronald Leaf & Mitchell Taubman

  2. Endicott College, Beverly, MA, USA

    Justin B. Leaf & Joseph H. Cihon

Authors
  1. Justin B. Leaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph H. Cihon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julia L. Ferguson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John McEachin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ronald Leaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mitchell Taubman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin B. Leaf.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with 1964 Helsinki decoration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leaf, J.B., Cihon, J.H., Ferguson, J.L. et al. Evaluating Three Methods of Stimulus Rotation when Teaching Receptive Labels. Behav Analysis Practice 11, 334–349 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0249-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0249-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation