Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of Race/Ethnicity Reporting in Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis Clinical Research in the USA

  • Published:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about racial differences in the incidence of light chain (AL) amyloidosis despite the well-documented racial disparities in the epidemiology of other plasma cell disorders. The goal of this study was to examine the extent to which published clinical research in AL amyloidosis report information on patients’ race. Clinical research publications in AL amyloidosis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, from the USA were identified. In addition to the reporting of race, study design, funding, cohort size, year of publication, impact factor of publication journal, and first author degree were abstracted. Among papers reporting race, we also assessed whether ethnicity was reported separately. A PubMed search yielded 2,770 papers of which 220 met the pre-specified criteria for analysis. Of those, 37 (16.5%) reported race. Single institution publications, those with physicians as first authors, and those published in journals with impact factor 6 or higher were less likely to report race. On multivariate analysis, only single institution studies were negatively associated with race reporting. Of the 37 papers reporting race, none defined it in methods, 16% stated how race was identified, and 19% discussed its significance. Ethnicity was reported in 6 studies. Our results indicate that race/ethnicity is underreported in USA. AL amyloidosis clinical literature leads to a challenge for identifying potential racial/ethnic disparities. Standards for collecting and reporting racial/ethnic demographics are needed. Clear and consistent reporting of race and ethnicity of clinical populations is a necessary first step in identifying disparities and promoting equitable care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gertz MA. Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: 2016 update on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2016;91:947–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Merlini G. AL amyloidosis: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapies. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017;1–12:2017.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schulman A, Connors LH, Weinberg J, et al. Patient outcomes in light chain (AL) amyloidosis: the clock is ticking from symptoms to diagnosis. Eur J Haematol. 2020;105:495–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Lancet. 2016;387:2641–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, et al. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:989–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchorawala V, Boccadoro M, Gertz M, et al. Guidelines for high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for systemic AL amyloidosis: EHA-ISA working group guidelines. Amyloid:1–7, 2021

  7. Quock TP, Yan T, Chang E, et al. Epidemiology of AL amyloidosis: a real-world study using US claims data. Blood Adv. 2018;2:1046–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Staron A, Connors LH, Ruberg FL, et al. A new era of amyloidosis: the trends at a major US referral centre. Amyloid. 2019;26:192–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Landgren O, Weiss BM. Patterns of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma in various ethnic/racial groups: support for genetic factors in pathogenesis. Leukemia. 2009;23:1691–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander KM, Orav J, Singh A, et al. Geographic disparities in reported US amyloidosis mortality from 1979 to 2015: potential underdetection of cardiac amyloidosis. Jama Cardiol. 2018;3:865–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL, et al. The reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals: comments invited. Jama. 2021;325:1049–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Group WoS: Journal Citation Report 2020, Clarivate, 2020

  13. Bureau USC: About Race, 2021

  14. Staron A, Connors LH, Zheng L, et al. Race/ethnicity in systemic AL amyloidosis: perspectives on disease and outcome disparities. Blood Cancer J. 2020;10:118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Souza A, Pezzin L, Laud P, et al. Racial disparities in patients diagnosed with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. RIghts USDotIOoC: Standards for maintaining, collecting, and presenting federal data on race and ethnicity, 1997

  17. Swanson GM, Bailar JC 3rd. Selection and description of cancer clinical trials participants–science or happenstance? Cancer. 2002;95:950–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell KW, Carey LA, Peppercorn J. Reporting of race and ethnicity in breast cancer research: room for improvement. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118:511–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loree JM, Anand S, Dasari A, et al. Disparity of race reporting and representation in clinical trials leading to cancer drug approvals from 2008 to 2018. Jama Oncol 5:e191870, 2019

  20. Vince RA, Jr., Eyrich NW, Mahal BA, et al. Reporting of racial health disparities research: are we making progress? J Clin Oncol:Jco2101780, 2021

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Ms. Rita Sieracki, MLS and Ms. Elizabeth Suelzer, MLIS, AHIP with MCW Libraries for their assistance in conducting the literature review. ML was supported by the Department of Medicine for a Medical Student Summer Research Project Research to conduct this research. Research reported in this publication was also supported by K23 HL141445 (AD). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Funding

National Heart,Lung,and Blood Institute,K23HL141445,Anita D'Souza,Medical College of Wisconsin,Medical Student Summer Research Program,Mingqian Lin

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study design: AD and AK. Data collection and analysis: ML, LP and AD. Draft manuscript: ML, AD. Results review and editing the paper: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita D’Souza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

ML, LP, MA have no conflicts to reports. AK reports the following: Advisory Board:

Abbvie, Alynylam, BMS, Cota Health, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptide, Takeda, AD reports the following: Research funding: Caelum, Prothena, Sanofi, Takeda, TeneoBio, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Consultant: Janssen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, M., Pezzin, L.E., Mohamedi, A. et al. Prevalence of Race/Ethnicity Reporting in Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis Clinical Research in the USA. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 10, 644–650 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-022-01252-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-022-01252-3

Navigation