Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New Paradigm for Addressing Health Disparities in Inner-City Environments: Adopting a Disaster Zone Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inner cities are characterized by intergenerational poverty, limited educational opportunities, poor health, and high levels of segregation. Human capital, defined as the intangible, yet integral economically productive aspects of individuals, is limited by factors influencing inner-city populations. Inner-city environments are consistent with definitions of disasters causing a level of suffering that exceeds the capacity of the affected community. This article presents a framework for improving health among inner-city populations using a multidisciplinary approach drawn from medicine, economics, and disaster response. Results from focus groups and photovoice conducted in Milwaukee, WI are used as a case study for a perspective on using this approach to address health disparities. A disaster approach provides a long-term focus on improving overall health and decreasing health disparities in the inner city, instead of a short-term focus on immediate relief of a single symptom. Adopting a disaster approach to inner-city environments is an innovative way to address the needs of those living in some of the most marginalized communities in the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Image 1
Image 2
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teitz MB, Chapple K. The causes of inner-city poverty: eight hypotheses in search of reality. Cityscape. 1998;1:33–70.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mills ES, Lubuele LS. Inner cities. J Econ Lit. 1997;35(2):727–56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson WJ, Aponte R. Urban poverty. Annu Rev Sociol. 1985;11(1):231–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrulis DP. The urban health penalty: new dimensions and directions in inner-city health care. In: Inner-City Health Care. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 1997. no 1. (Available from: American College of Physicians, Independence Mall West, Sixth Street at Race, Philadelphia, PA 19106).

    Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Physicians. Inner-city health care. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:485–90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell JA, Egede LE. Individual-, community-, and health system–level barriers to optimal type 2 diabetes care for inner-city African Americans: an integrative review and model development. Diabetes Educ. 2019;5:0145721719889338.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Axel-Lute M. 4 reasons to retire the phrase “inner city”. Shelter Force. 2017. Accessed from: https://shelterforce.org/2017/05/23/4-reasons-to-retire-the-phrase-inner-city/. Accessed 2 Feb 2020.

  8. CensusScope available at www.censusscope.org based on William H. Frey and Dowell Myers’ analysis of Census 2000. Accessed 19 Mar 2018.

  9. Jacobs H, Kiersz A, Lubin G. The 25 most segregated cities in America. Business Insider. 2013. www.businessinsider.com/most-segregated-cities-in-america-2013-11. Accessed 15 Feb 2020.

  10. Wang C, Burris MA. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav. 1997;24(3):369–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. World Bank. The human capital project. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2018. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30498/33252.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y. Accessed 15 Feb 2020

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Becker GS. Human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1964. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/HumanCapital.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stein F, Sridhar D. Back to the future? Health and the World Bank’s human capital index. BMJ. 2019;367:15706.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Becker GS. Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. 3rd ed. National Bureau of Economic Research: The University of Chicago Press; 1993.

  15. Zill N, Moore K, Smith E, Stief T, Coiro MJ. The life circumstances and development of children in welfare families: a profile based on National Survey Data. Washington, DC: Child Trends; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elman C, Wray LA, Xi J. Fundamental resource dis/advantages, youth health and adult educational outcomes. Soc Sci Res. 2014;43:108–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wise PH, Meyers A. Poverty and child health. Pediatr Clin N Am. 1988;35:1169–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sum A. The consequences of dropping out of high school: Joblessness and jailing for high school dropouts and the high cost for taxpayers. In: Center for Labor Market Studies. Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts. 2009. https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/downloads/neu:376324?datastream_id=content. Accessed 2 Feb 2020.

  19. Danziger SK, Kalil A, Anderson NJ. Human capital, physical health, and mental health of welfare recipients: co-occurrence and correlates. J Soc Issues. 2000;56(4):635–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anson O, Anson J. (1987). Women’s health and labour force status: an enquiry using a multi-point measure of labour force participation. Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(1):57–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hershey AM, Pavetti LA. Turning job finders into job keepers. The Future of Children. 1997. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602579.

  22. Fraker T. Iowa’s limited benefit plan. In: Office of planning, research, & evaluation. 1997. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/iowas-limited-benefit-plan-executive-summary. Accessed 5 Mar 2020.

  23. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Does employment affect health? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:230–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oates GR, Jackson BE, Partridge EE, Singh KP, Fouad MN, Bae S. Sociodemographic patterns of chronic disease: how the mid-south region compares to the rest of the country. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(Suppl 1):S31–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Druss BG, Marcus SC, Olfson M, Tanielian T, Elinson L, Pincus HA. Comparing the national economic burden of five chronic conditions. Health Aff. 2001;20(6):233–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cline RJ, Orom H, Berry-Bobovski L, Hernandez T, Black CB, Schwartz AG, et al. Community-level social support responses in a slow-motion technological disaster: the case of Libby. Montana Am J Community Psychol. 2010;46(1–2):1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization. IFRC World Disaster Report. 2000 http://apps.who.int/disasters/repo/7656.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2020.

  28. Leider JP, DeBruin D, Reynolds N, Koch A, Seaberg J. Ethical guidance for disaster response, specifically around crisis standards of care: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(9):e1–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Porter ME. The Competitive Advantage of the Inner City. In: Harvard Business Review. 1995. https://hbr.org/1995/05/the-competitive-advantage-of-the-inner-city. Accessed 5 Jan 2020.

  30. Schultz TW. Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev. 1961;51:1–17.

  31. Lim SS, Updike RL, Kaldjian AS, Barber RM, Cowling K, York H, et al. Measuring human capital: a systematic analysis of 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016. Lancet. 2018;392:1217–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim JY. The human capital gap. Foreign Aff. 2018;92:102.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Litz BT, Gray MJ, Bryant RA, Adler AB. Early intervention for trauma: current status and future directions. Clin Psychol. 2002;9(2):112–34.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Berkowitz S, Bryant R, Brymer M, Hamblen J, Jacobs A, Layne C, et al. The National Center for PTSD & the National Child Traumatic Stress Network, skills for psychological recovery: field operations guide. Washington, DC and London: American Psychiatric Pub; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eisenman DP, Zhou Q, Ong M, Asch S, Glik D, Long A. Variations in disaster preparedness by mental health, perceived general health, and disability status. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(1):33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Galea S, Tracy M, Norris F, Coffey SF. Financial and social circumstances and the incidence and course of PTSD in Mississippi during the first two years after hurricane Katrina. J Trauma Stress. 2008;21(4):357–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lachlan KA, Spence PR. Crisis communication and the underserved: the case for partnering with institutions of faith. J Appl Commun Res. 2011;39(4):448–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Plough A, Fielding JE, Chandra A, Williams M, Eisenman D, Wells KB, et al. Building community disaster resilience: perspectives from a large urban county department of public health. A J Public Health. 2013;103(7):1190–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard E. Egede.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egede, L.E., Walker, R.J., Campbell, J.A. et al. A New Paradigm for Addressing Health Disparities in Inner-City Environments: Adopting a Disaster Zone Approach. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 8, 690–697 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00828-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00828-1

Keywords

Navigation