Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring the Nexus Between Microfinance Activities and Economic Wellbeing at the Grassroots: Evidence From an Emerging Market Economy

  • Published:
Global Social Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This paper investigates the effect of microfinance activities on the economic wellbeing of individuals at the grassroots. It specifically investigated the effect of microfinance interest rates, microfinance products/services and microfinance social support on grassroots economic wellbeing. Furthermore, it examines how microfinance activities, such as social support and lending, interact to impact the economic wellbeing of beneficiaries at the grassroots.

Design/Methodology/Approach

The study used a sequential exploratory mixed methods research design. First qualitative data was collected from ten purposively sampled participants to probe and confirm some constructs in the survey instrument. Quantitative data was then collected from 350 randomly sampled customers of the top five microfinance institutions in Ghana using structured survey instrument. Data was analysed using descriptive and multivariate analysis.

Findings

The study results showed that microfinance cost (β = 0.312, t = 5.457, p < 0.001), interest rates (β = − 0.191, t = − 3.204, p < 0.01), products/services (β = 0.328, t = 7.136, p < 0.001) and social support (β = 0.312, t = 6.631, p < 0.001) all had a significant impact on grassroots economic wellbeing. It also highlighted the complexity of the interactions among microfinance activities, government policies and poverty alleviation interventions.

Practical Implications

These findings have structural implications for the operation of microfinance institutions in developing countries such as Ghana. To promote longevity and effectively exploit the inherent benefits of microfinance activities for grassroots beneficiaries, the current top-bottom approach used in the introduction of poverty alleviation-related interventions must be revised to a more sustainable participatory approach where the input of grassroots participants should be sought. The latter approach will help address the policy lapses common to the many failed government interventions on microfinance activities.

Originality/Value

The paper advocates the need to introduce government interventions that encourage a saving culture among individuals at the grassroots. It offers an unorthodox approach (bottom-up stakeholder participatory orientation in the formulation of policies) to addressing the many policy lapses undermining inclusiveness for informal sector participants with regard to accessing finance. Finally, it provides a blueprint towards the empowerment of minority groups at the grassroots to alleviate poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aassve, A., Betti, G., Mazzuco, S., & Mencarini, L. (2007). Marital disruption and economic well-being: a comparative analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170(3), 781–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, G. (2017). Contribution of dry season farming to the alleviation of poverty among small scale farmers in the Upper West Region of Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, Ashesi University).

  • Adato, M., Lund, F., & Mhlongo, P. (2007). Methodological innovations in research on the dynamics of poverty: a longitudinal study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. World Development, 35(2), 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adjei, J. K., Arun, T., & Hossain, F. (2009). The role of microfinance in asset-building and poverty reduction: the case of Sinapi Aba Trust of Ghana. Manchester: University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage.

  • Alhassan, A. L., & Biekpe, N. (2016). Insurance market development and economic growth: exploring causality in 8 selected African countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(3), 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appah, E., John, M. S., & Wisdom, S. (2012). An analysis of microfinance and poverty Argentina. Development and Policy Review, 19(3), 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asiama, J. P., & Osei, V. (2007). Microfinance in Ghana: an overview. Accra: Research Department, Bank of Ghana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayayi, A. G., & Peprah, J. A. (2018). Cost implications of microfinance regulation: lessons from Ghana. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 8(3), 259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B., & Jackson, L. (2017). Microfinance and the business of poverty reduction: critical perspectives from rural Bangladesh. Human Relations, 70(1), 63–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangoura, L. (2012). Microfinance as an approach to development in low income countries. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 35(4), 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (2006). Globalization, poverty, and inequality: what is the relationship? What can be done? World Development, 34(8), 1361–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E., Aguilera, M., & Schintz, J. (2018). Who benefits? The interactional determinants of microfinance’s varied effects. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(2), 235–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boabeng, K. Y. (2009). The informal sector and the microfinance industry (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Chang, A. Y., & Bruton, G. D. (2017). Microfinance: where are we today and where should the research go in the future? International Small Business Journal, 35(7), 793–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, E., Hague, S., & McKay, A. (2016). The Ghana poverty and inequality report: using the 6th Ghana living standards survey. Accra: UNICEF.

  • Copestake, J., Dawson, P., Fanning, J. P., McKay, A., & Wright-Revolledo, K. (2005). Monitoring the diversity of the poverty outreach and impact of microfinance: a comparison of methods using data from Peru. Development and Policy Review, 23(6), 703–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damoah, I. S., Akwei, C., & Mouzughi, Y. (2015). Causes of government project failure in developing countries–focus on Ghana. In British Academy of Management (BAM) Conference (pp. 1–10).

  • Debrah, E. (2013). Alleviating poverty in Ghana: the case of livelihood empowerment against poverty (LEAP). Africa Today, 59(4), 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzanku, F. M. (2015). Transient rural livelihoods and poverty in Ghana. Journal of Rural Studies, 40(1), 102–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzisi, S., & Obeng, F. (2013). Microfinance and the socio-economic wellbeing of women entrepreneurs in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 3(11), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egyir, I. S. (2010). Rural women and microfinance in Ghana: challenges and prospects, No 95782, 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19–23, 2010. Cape Town: African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).

  • Ferdousi, F. (2015). Impact of microfinance on sustainable entrepreneurship development. Development Studies Research, 2(1), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 382–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). (2012). 2010 population and housing census: summary report of final results. Accra: GSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K. S., & Azam, M. S. (2012). Does microfinance reduce poverty in Bangladesh? New evidence from household panel data. Journal of Development Studies, 48(5), 633–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K. S., Arun, T., & Annim, S. K. (2010). Microfinance and household poverty reduction: new evidence from India. World Development, 38(12), 1760–1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandker, S. R. (2005). Microfinance and poverty: evidence using panel data from Bangladesh. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandker, S., & Haughton, J. (2009). Handbook on poverty and inequality. The World Bank: Washington D. C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotir, J. H., & Obeng-Odoom, F. (2009). Microfinance and rural household development: a Ghanaian perspective. Journal of Developing Societies, 25(1), 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahjabeen, R. (2008). Microfinancing in Bangladesh: impact on households, consumption and welfare. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(6), 1083–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E. E., Cook, P. F., Terada, M., & Aloia, M. S. (2010). Randomizing research participants: promoting balance and concealment in small samples. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(3), 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molini, V., & Paci, P. (2015). Poverty reduction in Ghana: progress and challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng’etich Joseph Collins, K. W. (2011). The effects of interest rate spread on the level of non-performing assets: a case of commercial banks in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Public Management, 1(1), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nudzor, H. P. (2013). Exploring the policy implementation paradox: using the Free Compulsory Universal Basic Education (fCUBE) policy in Ghana as an exemplar. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(8), 933–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E. (1999). The contribution of longitudinal research to the study of women’s poverty. Quality and Quantity, 33(3), 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students. Pearson: Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawada, Y., & Takasaki, Y. (2017). Natural disaster, poverty, and development: an introduction. World Development, 94, 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selase, A. E., & Lu, X. (2018). The impact of Ghana government poverty alleviation actions in the National Poverty Eradication Programme. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3118226.

  • Sustiyo, J. (2016). Microfinance works: a meta-analysis of its effect on poverty reduction. The Hague: Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooyen, C., Stewart, R., & De Wet, T. (2012). The impact of microfinance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the evidence. World Development, 40(11), 2249–2262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, M. D., Alvarado, J., Galarza, F. (2003). Promising practices in rural finance: experiences from Latin America and the Caribbean. Lima: Centro Peruano de Estudios Sociales, Inter-America Development Bank, Academia de Centroamerica.

  • World Bank. (2018). Decline of global extreme poverty continues but has slowed: World Bank. Resource Document. World Bank https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/09/19/decline-of-global-extreme-poverty-continues-but-has-slowed-world-bank. Accessed 18 May 2020.

  • Yeboah, E. (2017). The impact of microfinance on grassroots development: evidence from SMEs in Kwabre East District of Ashanti Region of Ghana. Open Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Livingstone Divine Caesar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Construct and reliability analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Appietu, R.K., Dankwa, I.O. & Caesar, L.D. Exploring the Nexus Between Microfinance Activities and Economic Wellbeing at the Grassroots: Evidence From an Emerging Market Economy. Glob Soc Welf 8, 337–349 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-020-00172-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-020-00172-6

Keywords

Navigation