Skip to main content
Log in

Personality Traits Are Associated with Academic Achievement in Medical School: A Nationally Representative Study

  • Empirical Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This nationally representative study sought to identify personality traits that are associated with academic achievement in medical school.

Methods

Third-year medical students, who completed an initial questionnaire in January 2011, were mailed a second questionnaire several months later during their fourth year. Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and burnout, the authors used multivariate logistic regressions to determine whether Big Five personality traits were associated with receiving honors/highest grade in clinical clerkships, failing a course or rotation, and being selected for the Alpha Omega Alpha or Gold Humanism Honor Society.

Results

The adjusted response rates for the two surveys were 61 (n = 564/919) and 84% (n = 474/564). The personality trait conscientiousness predicted obtaining honors/highest grade in all clinical clerkships. In contrast, students high in neuroticism were less likely to do well in most specialties. Students with higher conscientiousness were more likely to be inducted into the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society, while students high in openness or agreeableness traits were more likely to be inducted into the Gold Humanism Honor Society. Burnout was not associated with any clinical performance measures.

Conclusions

This study suggests the importance of personality traits, particularly conscientiousness, in predicting success during the clinical years of medical school. Medical educators should consider a nuanced examination of personality traits and other non-cognitive factors, particularly for psychiatry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Dunleavy DM, Kroopnick MH, Dowd KW, Searcy CA, Zhao X. The predictive validity of the MCAT exam in relation to academic performance through medical school: a national cohort study of 2001–2004 matriculants. Acad Med. 2013;88:666–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. White CB, Dey EL, Fantone JC. Analysis of factors that predict clinical performance in medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:455–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donnon T, Oddone-Paolucci E, Violato C. The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: a meta-analysis of the published research. Acad Med. 2007;82:100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Silver B, Hodgson CS. Evaluating GPAs and MCAT scores as predictors of NBME I and clerkship performances based on students’ data from one undergraduate institution. Acad Med. 1997;72:394–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ. 2002;324:952–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Doherty EM, Nugent E. Personality factors and medical training: a review of the literature. Med Educ. 2011;45:132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lievens F, Ones DS, Dilchert S. Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94:1514–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chibnall JT, Blaskiewicz RJ. Do clinical evaluations in a psychiatry clerkship favor students with positive personality characteristics? Acad Psychiatry. 2008;32:199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferguson E, McManus IC, James D, O'Hehir F, Sanders A. Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree. BMJ. 2003;326:429–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson E, Semper H, Yates J, Fitzgerald JE, Skatova A, James D. The ‘dark side’ and ‘bright side’ of personality: when too much conscientiousness and too little anxiety are detrimental with respect to the acquisition of medical knowledge and skill. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88606.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hojat M, Callahan C, Gonnella J. Students’ personality and ratings of clinical competence in medical school clerkships: a longitudinal study. Psychol Health Med. 2004;9:247–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. University of Chicago. Program on medicine and religion. Project on the Good Physician. https://pmr.uchicago.edu/projects/research/good-physician. Accessed 2 March 2016.

  13. Alpha Omega Alpha . Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society. http://www.alphaomegaalpha.org/. Accessed 11 May 2016.

  14. Arnold P. Gold Foundation. Gold Humanism Honor Society. 2015. http://humanism-in-medicine.org/ghhs/. Accessed 11 May 2016.

  15. Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. 1989;105.

  16. McManus IC, Keeling A, Paice E. Stress, burnout and doctors’ attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: a twelve year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates. BMC Med. 2004;2:29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McManus IC, Smithers E, Partridge P, Keeling A, Fleming PR. A levels and intelligence as predictors of medical careers in UK doctors: 20 year prospective study. BMJ. 2003;327:139–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Furnham A, McManus C, Scott D. Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare. Anthrozoos MultidiscipJ Interactions People Animals. 2003;16:135–46.

    Google Scholar 

  19. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Sloan JA, Shanafelt TD. Single item measures of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization are useful for assessing burnout in medical professionals. JGIM. 2009;24:1318–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts BW, Lejuez C, Krueger RF, Richards JM, Hill PL. What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed? Dev Psychol. 2014;50:1315–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haight SJ, Chibnall JT, Schindler DL, Slavin SJ. Associations of medical student personality and health/wellness characteristics with their medical school performance across the curriculum. Acad Med. 2012;87:476–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levine RE, Carlson DL, Rosenthal RH, Clegg KA, Crosby RD. Usage of the National Board of Medical Examiners subject test in psychiatry by US and Canadian clerkships. Acad Psychiatry. 2005;29:52–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chamorro-Premuzic T, Furnham A. Personality traits and academic examination performance. Eur J Personal. 2003;17:237–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tyssen R, Dolatowski FC, Røvik JO, et al. Personality traits and types predict medical school stress: a six-year longitudinal and nationwide study. Med Educ. 2007;41:781–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoffman BM, Coons MJ, Kuo PC. Personality differences between surgery residents, nonsurgery residents, and medical students. Surgery. 2010;148:187–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McGreevy J, Wiebe D. A preliminary measurement of the surgical personality. Am J Surg. 2002;184:121–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Finn G, Sawdon M, Clipsham L, McLachlan J. Peer estimation of lack of professionalism correlates with low Conscientiousness Index scores. Med Educ. 2009;43:960–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McLachlan JC, Finn G, Macnaughton J. The conscientiousness index: a novel tool to explore students’ professionalism. Acad Med. 2009;84:559–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TN. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med Educ. 2016;50:132–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dyrbye LN, Harper W, Durning SJ, et al. Patterns of distress in US medical students. Med Teacher. 2011;33:834–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Salanova M, Schaufeli W, Martínez I, Bresó E. How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: the mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010;23:53–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cook AF, Arora VM, Rasinski KA, Curlin FA, Yoon JD. The prevalence of medical student mistreatment and its association with burnout. Acad Med. 2014;89:7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hudson NW, Fraley RC. Volitional personality trait change: can people choose to change their personality traits? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015;109:490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts BW, Luo J, Briley DA, Chow PI, Su R, Hill PL. A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychol Bull. 2017; doi:10.1037/bul0000088.

  35. Kulasegaram K, Reiter HI, Wiesner W, Hackett RD, Norman GR. Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2010;15:415–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Annikea Miller, Hyo Jung Tak, and Dr. Kenneth Rasinski for their capable and generous contributions to the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Yoon.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Considerations

The authors obtained IRB approval by the University of Chicago Social and Behavioral Sciences institutional review board.

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding Sources

This project was supported by A New Science of Virtues, The Arête Initiative at the University of Chicago through a grant from the John Templeton Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sobowale, K., Ham, S.A., Curlin, F.A. et al. Personality Traits Are Associated with Academic Achievement in Medical School: A Nationally Representative Study. Acad Psychiatry 42, 338–345 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0766-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0766-5

Keywords

Navigation