Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing Entrustable Professional Activities During the Psychiatry Clerkship

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Within 10 years, the Association of American Medical Colleges envisions graduating medical students will be entrusted by their school to perform 13 core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) without direct supervision. The authors focused on eight EPAs that appear most relevant to clinical training during the psychiatry clerkship at their institution to evaluate whether students assess themselves as making progress in EPAs during this clerkship, to see how students’ self-assessments compare with the clerkship director’s assessments, and to see if weaknesses in the curriculum were found.

Methods

An EPA-assessment scale was designed (ratings 1 to 5) to assess progress toward entrustment in each EPA. Medical students completed pre- and post-psychiatry clerkship self-assessments. The clerkship director independently assessed each student’s progress in EPAs utilizing assessment methods already present in the curriculum.

Results

Seventy of 116 students (60.3%) completed both pre- and post-clerkship self-assessments. These ratings increased significantly from pre- to post-clerkship, representing large effect sizes from 0.83 to 1.13. The largest mean rating increase was observed for EPA 2, Prioritize a differential diagnosis following a clinical encounter. Mean post-clerkship self-assessment ratings were significantly higher than mean post-clerkship instructor ratings for seven of the eight EPAs.

Conclusions

The results suggest training during the psychiatry clerkship can contribute to the professional development of medical students in the eight EPAs studied but that student self-assessments tend to be higher than those of the clerkship director. Further study is needed of the relative value and role of student self-assessments versus faculty assessments of progress in EPAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Dhaliwal U, Gupta P, Singh T. Entrustable professional activities: teaching and assessing clinical competence. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:591–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen HC, McNamara M, Teherani A, ten Cate O, O’Sullivan P. Developing entrustable professional activities for entry into clerkship. Acad Med. 2016;91:247–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Association of American Medical Colleges. Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency, Curriculum Developer’s Guide, 2014.

  4. Chen H, van den Broek S, ten Cate O. The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90:431–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Englander R, Carraccio C. From theory to practice: making entrustable professional activities come to life in the context of milestones. Acad Med. 2014;89:1321–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aylward M, Nixon J, Gladding S. An entrustable professional activity (EPA) for handoffs as a model for EPA assessment development. Acad Med. 2014;89:1335–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klapheke M, Johnson TR, Cubero M. Assessment of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) during the third and fourth years of medical school, including pre- and post-psychiatry clerkship. MedEdPORTAL’s iCollaborative: https://www.mededportal.org/icollaborative/resource/4180.

  8. Gordon M. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Acad Med. 1991;66:762–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mattheos N, Nattestad A, Falk-Nilsson E, Attstrom R. The interactive examination: assessing students’ self-assessment ability. Med Educ. 2004;38:378–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Isenberg GA, Roy V, Veloski J, Berg K, Yeo CF. Evaluation of the validity of medical students’ self-assessments of proficiency in clinical simulations. J Surg Res. 2015;193:554–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Langendyk V. Not knowing that they do not know: self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students. Med Educ. 2006;40:173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Colbert-Getz JM, Fleishman C, Jung J, Shilkofski N. How do gender and anxiety affect students’ self-assessment and actual performance on a high-stakes clinical skills examination? Acad Med. 2013;88:44–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blanch-Hartigan D. Medical students’ self-assessment of performance: results from three meta-analyses. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Angus SV, Vu TR, Willett LL, Call S, Halvorsen AJ, Chaudhry S. Internal medicine residency program directors’ views of the core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: an opportunity to enhance communication of competency along the continuum. Acad Med. 2016. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001419.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Klapheke.

Ethics declarations

The University of Central Florida Institutional Review Board approved this study as human participant research that is exempt from regulation. Identifiable student self-assessments were never available to the principal investigator. Student self-assessments were available in Qualtrics (an online survey design and delivery system that is password-protected) only to the statistician for analysis after the students completed the psychiatry clerkship, and all final grades were assigned.

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding Source

The authors completed this study as part of their academic employment at the University of Central Florida College of Medicine; there was no grant support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klapheke, M., Johnson, T. & Cubero, M. Assessing Entrustable Professional Activities During the Psychiatry Clerkship. Acad Psychiatry 41, 345–349 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0665-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0665-9

Keywords

Navigation