Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the SPH method to solitary wave impact on an offshore platform

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the interaction between large waves and floating offshore structures. Here, the fluid–structure interaction is considered using the weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method. To ensure the applicability of this method, we validate its prediction for fluid forces and rigid-body motion against two sets of experimental data. These are impact due to dam break, and wave induced motion of a floating cube. For the dam break problem, the SPH method is used to predict impact forces on a rectangular column located downstream. In the second case of a floating cube, the SPH method simulates the motion of a buoyant cube under the action of induced waves, where a wall placed upstream of the cube is displaced sinusoidally to induce waves. In both cases, the SPH framework implemented is able to accurately reproduce the experimental results. Following validation, we apply this framework to simulation of a toy model of a tension-leg platform upon impact of a large solitary wave. This analysis shows that the platform may be pulled into the water by stretched tension legs, where the extension of the tension legs also governs the rotational behavior of the platform. The result also indicates that a tension-leg platform is very unlikely to topple over during the arrival of an extreme wave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lehner S, Rosenthal W (2006) Investigation of ship and platform accidents due to severe weather events: results of the maxwave project. In: 25th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 753–760

  2. Monaghan JJ (1994) Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 110(2):399–406

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Monaghan JJ (2012) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and its diverse applications. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 44:323–346

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu G-R, Liu MB (2003) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a meshfree particle method. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu MB, Liu GR (2010) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(1):25–76

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Raad PE, Bidoae R (2005) The three-dimensional Eulerian–Lagrangian marker and micro cell method for the simulation of free surface flows. J Comput Phys 203(2):668–699

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cummins SJ, Silvester TB, Cleary PW (2012) Three-dimensional wave impact on a rigid structure using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 68(12):1471–1496

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gómez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple Robert A (2004) Using a three-dimensional smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for wave impact on a tall structure. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 130(2):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruol P, Martinelli L (2007) Wave flume investigation on different mooring systems for floating breakwaters. Coast Struct 7

  10. Manenti S, Ruol P (2008) Fluid–structure interaction in design of offshore wind turbines: SPH modeling of basic aspects. In: Proceedings of international workshop handling exception in structural, engineering

  11. Morris JP, Fox PJ, Zhu Y (1997) Modeling low reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH. J Comput Phys 136(1):214–226

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Monaghan JJ (2005) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Rep Prog Phys 68(8):1703

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Moncho G-G, Rogers BD, Crespo AJC, Dalrymple RA, Narayanaswamy M, Dominguez JM (2012) Sphysics-development of a free-surface fluid solver—part 1: theory and formulations. Comput Geosci 48:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crespo AC, Dominguez JM, Barreiro A, Moncho G-G, Rogers BD (2011) Gpus, a new tool of acceleration in CFD: efficiency and reliability on smoothed particle hydrodynamics methods. PLoS One 6(6):e20685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Monaghan JJ (1992) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 30:543–574

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Batchelor GK (2000) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomez-Gesteira M, Rogers BD, Dalrymple RA, Crespo AJC (2010) State-of-the-art of classical SPH for free-surface flows. J Hydraul Res 48(S1):6–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crespo AJC, Gómez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple Robert A (2007) Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods. CMC Tech Sci Press 5(3):173

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Meriam JL, Kraige LG (2012) Engineering mechanics: dynamics, vol 2. Wiley, New York

  20. Belytschko T, Krongauz Y, Dolbow J, Gerlach C (1998) On the completeness of meshfree particle methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43(5):785–819

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Dilts GA (1999) Moving-least-squares-particle hydrodynamicsi. Consistency and stability. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(8):1115–1155

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Bonet J, Lok T-SL (1999) Variational and momentum preservation aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamic formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 180(1):97–115

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Vila JP (1999) On particle weighted methods and smooth particle hydrodynamics. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 9(02):161–209

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen JK, Beraun JE (2000) A generalized smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for nonlinear dynamic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(1):225–239

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Antuono M, Colagrossi A, Marrone S (2012) Numerical diffusive terms in weakly-compressible SPH schemes. Comput Phys Commun 183(12):2570–2580

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaughan GL, Healy TR, Bryan KR, Sneyd AD, Gorman RM (2008) Completeness, conservation and error in SPH for fluids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 56(1):37–62

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Goring DG (1978) Tsunamis—the propagation of long waves onto a shelf. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology

  28. Synolakis CE (1990) Generation of long waves in laboratory. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 116(2):252–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anbarsooz M, Passandideh-Fard M, Moghiman M (2013) Fully nonlinear viscous wave generation in numerical wave tanks. Ocean Eng 59:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, K., IJzermans, R.H.A., Jones, B.D. et al. Application of the SPH method to solitary wave impact on an offshore platform. Comp. Part. Mech. 3, 155–166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0069-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0069-0

Keywords

Navigation