Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies: New Approaches

  • Drug Allergy (M Audicana, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Allergy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Adverse reactions to monoclonal antibodies are increasing in parallel with the development of new ones. Hypersensitivity reactions related with these drugs are difficult to classify using the traditional Gell and Coombs hypersensitivity reaction classification. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) mainly differ from most “traditional” drugs as they are not chemical compounds, but proteins are very similar to human ones. Therefore, their metabolism, mode of action, and immunogenicity are unlike other drugs, and adverse reactions might also differ. This review focuses on the classification and underlying mechanism of the HSR induced by mAb, the available diagnostic tools, and biomarkers, as well as the therapeutic approach.

Recent findings and summary

A new classification for mAb HSR based on endotype instead of phenotypic presentation has been recently proposed. Indeed, drug provocation test has been proposed in the diagnostic algorithm of mAb HSR, similarly to other “classic” drugs. Finally, we discuss the lack of knowledge about the underlying mechanism of these HSR and other unmet needs in diagnostics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Malik B, Ghatol A. Understanding how monoclonal antibodies work. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572118/. This paper explains what mAb are and how they work.

  2. Jin S, Sun Y, Liang X, Gu X, Ning J, Xu Y, et al. Emerging new therapeutic antibody derivatives for cancer treatment. Signal Transduc Target Ther. 2022;7:39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pichler WJ. Adverse side-effects to biological agents. Allergy. 2006;61:912–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee SJ, Kavanaugh A. Adverse reactions to biologic agents: focus on autoimmune disease therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:900–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung CH, Mirakhur B, Chan E, Le Q-T, Berlin J, Morse M, et al. Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1109–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bavbek S, Pagani M, Alvarez-Cuesta E, Castells M, Dursun AB, Hamadi S, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to biologicals: an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2021;77:39–54. EAACI position paper on HRSs. It explains the type of reactions, the diagnostic tools, and the treatment possibilities.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brockow K, Garvey LH, Aberer W, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Barbaud A, Bilo MB, et al. Skin test concentrations for systemically administered drugs – an ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group position paper. Allergy. 2013;68:702–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bavbek S, Kendirlinan R, Çerçi P, Altıner S, Soyyiğit Ş, Çelebi Sözener Z, et al. Rapid drug desensitization with biologics: a single-center experience with four biologics. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;171:227–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Görgülü B, Seval GC, Kendirlinan R, Toprak SK, Özcan M, Bavbek S. Rapid drug desensitization with rituximab in 24 cases: a single-center experience. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2019;29:468–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de la Varga MR, Gutiérrez Fernández D, Áñez GA, Foncubierta Fernández A, Andrés García JA, Medina VF. Use of the basophil activation test in monitoring clinical tolerance after desensitization to brentuximab vedotin. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;118:745–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Isabwe GAC, Garcia Neuer M, de Las Vecillas Sanchez L, Lynch D-M, Marquis K, Castells M, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: phenotypes and endotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142:159–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vultaggio A, Matucci A, Nencini F, Pratesi S, Parronchi P, Rossi O, et al. Anti-infliximab IgE and non-IgE antibodies and induction of infusion-related severe anaphylactic reactions. Allergy. 2010;65:657–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Svenson M, Geborek P, Saxne T, Bendtzen K. Monitoring patients treated with anti-TNF- biopharmaceuticals: assessing serum infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies. Rheumatol (Oxford). 2007;46:1828–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brennan PJ, Rodriguez Bouza T, Hsu FI, Sloane DE, Castells MC, Boston P. Hypersensitivity reactions to mAbs: 105 desensitizations in 23 patients, from evaluation to treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:1259–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amorós-Reboredo P, Sánchez-López J, Bastida-Fernández C, do Pazo-Oubiña F, Borràs-Maixenchs N, Giné E, et al. Desensitization to rituximab in a multidisciplinary setting. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37:744–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Neil BH, Allen R, Spigel DR, Stinchcombe TE, Moore DT, Berlin JD, et al. High incidence of cetuximab-related infusion reactions in Tennessee and North Carolina and the association with atopic history. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3644–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galvão VR, Castells MC. Hypersensitivity to biological agents-updated diagnosis, management, and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3:175–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chitnavis M, Stein DJ, Commins S, Schuyer AJ, Behm B. First dose anaphylaxis to infliximab: a case of mammalian meat allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:1425–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mangla A, Agarwai N. Relevance of anti-galactose-alpha-1.3 galactose antibodies in the era on fonoclonal antibodies. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15:678–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin L, Chen X, Vicini P, Rup B, Hickling TP. Therapeutic outcomes, assessments, risk factors and mitigation efforts of immunogenicity of therapeutic protein products. Cell Immunol. 2015;295:118–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Meara S, Nanda KS, Moss AC. Antibodies to infliximab and risk of infusion reactions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Finkelman FD, Khodoun MV, Strait R. Human IgE-independent systemic anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:1674–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Beck SC, Wilding T, Buka RJ, Baretto RL, Huissoon AP, Krishna MT. Biomarkers in human anaphylaxis: a critical appraisal of current evidence and perspectives. Front Immunol. 2019;10:494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Han PD, Cohen RD. Managing immunogenic responses to infliximab: treatment implications for patients with Crohn’s disease. Drugs. 2004;64:1767–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolbink GJ, Vis M, Lems W, Voskuyl AE, De Groot E, Nurmohamed MT, et al. Development of antiinfliximab antibodies and relationship to clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:711–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nencini F, Vultaggio A, Pratesi S, Cammelli D, Milla M, Fiori G, et al. The kinetics of antidrug antibodies, drug levels, and clinical outcomes in infliximab-exposed patients with immune-mediated disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6:2065–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Radstake TRDJ, Svenson M, Eijsbouts AM, Van Den Hoogen FHJ, Enevold C, Van Riel PLCM, et al. Formation of antibodies against infliximab and adalimumab strongly correlates with functional drug levels and clinical responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1739–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vaisman-Mentesh A, Gutierrez-Gonzalez M, DeKosky BJ, Wine Y. The molecular mechanisms that underlie the immune biology of anti-drug antibody formation following treatment with monoclonal antibodies. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1951. This paper reviews studies that support possible molecular mechanisms causing the formation of ADA.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gorovits B, Baltrukonis DJ, Bhattacharya I, Birchler MA, Finco D, Sikkema D, et al. Immunoassay methods used in clinical studies for the detection of anti-drug antibodies to adalimumab and infliximab. Clin Exp Immunol. 2018;192:348–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wadhwa M. How should antibodies against mAb therapeutics be assessed?. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/presentation/presentation-how-should-antibodies-against-monoclonal-antibody-therapeutics-be-assessed_en.pdf

  31. Sala-Cunill A, Cardona V, Labrador-Horrillo M, Luengo O, Esteso O, Garriga T, et al. Usefulness and limitations of sequential serum tryptase for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis in 102 patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;160:192–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Buka RJ, Knibb RC, Crossman RJ, Melchior CL, Huissoon AP, Hackett S, et al. Anaphylaxis and clinical utility of real-world measurement of acute serum tryptase in UK emergency departments. J allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:1280–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beck SC, Wilding T, Buka RJ, Baretto RL, Huissoon AP, Krishna MT. Biomarkers in human anaphylaxis: a critical appraisal of current evidence and perspectives. Front immunol. 2019;10:494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Valent P, Akin C, Arock M, Brockow K, Butterfield JH, Carter MC, et al. Definitions, criteria and global classification of mast cell disorders with special reference to mast cell activation syndromes: a consensus proposal. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;157:215–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Valent P, Akin C, Bonadonna P, Hartmann K, Broesby-Olsen S, Brockow K, et al. Mast cell activation syndrome: importance of consensus criteria and call for research. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142:1008–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. González-de-Olano D, Morgado JM, Juárez-Guerrero R, Sánchez-Muñoz L, Letellez-Fernández J, Malón-Giménez D, et al. Positive basophil activation test following anaphylaxis to pertuzumab and successful treatment with rapid desensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4:338–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jakubovic BD, Sanchez-Sanchez S, Hamadi S, Lynch DM, Castells M. Interleukin-6: a novel biomarker for monoclonal antibody and chemotherapy-associated hypersensitivity confirms a cytokine release syndrome phenotype-endotype association. Allergy. 2021;76:1571–3. This paper demonstrates with a series of cases how IL6 moves in an HRS.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Weiszhár Z, Czúcz J, Révész C, Rosivall L, Szebeni J, Rozsnyay Z. Complement activation by polyethoxylated pharmaceutical surfactants: Cremophor-EL, Tween-80 and Tween-20. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012;45:492–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Coors EA, Seybold H, Merk HF, Mahler V. Polysorbate 80 in medical products and nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;95:593–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Martinez Arcediano A, Audicana MT, Longo N, Ibáñez EF, Blza de Vallejo OV, Velasco Azagra M, et al. Allergy to galactose alpha-1,3-galactose: clinical features and the diagnostic value of cetuximab. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24:450–1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. de la Varga MR, Gutiérrez Fernández D, Foncubierta Fernández A, Andrés García JA, Medina VF. Rapid subcutaneous desensitization for treatment of hypersensitivity reactions to etanercept in two patients with positive basophil activation test. Allergol Int. 2017;66:357–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ornelas C, Caiado J, Campos Melo A, Pereira Barbosa M, Castells MC, Pereira Dos Santos MC. The contribution of the basophil activation test to the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;177:274–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Giavina-Bianchi P, Galvão VR, Picard M, Caiado J, Castells MC. Basophil activation test is a relevant biomarker of the outcome of rapid desensitization in platinum compounds-allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:728–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alvarez-Cuesta E, Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Angel-Pereira D, Ureña-Tavera A, Zamora-Verduga M, Lopez-Gonzalez P, et al. Delving into cornerstones of hypersensitivity to antineoplastic and biological agents: value of diagnostic tools prior to desensitization. Allergy. 2015;70:784–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ureña-Tavera A, Zamora-Verduga M, Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Angel-Pereira D, Berges-Gimeno MP, Alvarez-Cuesta E. Hypersensitivity reactions to racemic calcium folinate (leucovorin) during FOLFOX and FOLFIRI chemotherapy administrations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:1066–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sloane D, Govindarajulu U, Harrow-Mortelliti J, Barry W, Hsu FI, Hong D, et al. Safety, costs, and efficacy of rapid drug desensitizations to chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4:497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Bernal-Rubio L, Berges-Gimeno MP, Carpio-Escalona LV, Gehlhaar P, Alvarez-Cuesta E. A large single-hospital experience using drug provocation testing and rapid drug desensitization in hypersensitivity to antineoplastic and biological agents. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7:618–32. This paper explains how exposure tests should be performed successfully.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Martí-Garrido J, Vázquez-Revuelta P, Lleonart-Bellfill R, Molina-Mata K, Muñoz-Sánchez C, Madrigal-Burgaleta R. Pilot experience using drug provocation testing for the study of hypersensitivity to chemotherapy and biological agents. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2021;31:166–8.It is described how the delabelling was carried out in 93 patients diagnosed with allergy to chemotherapeutic agents or mAbs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Vazquez-Revuelta P, Marti-Garrido J, Lleonart-Bellfill R, Ali FR, Alvarez-Cuesta E. Medical algorithm: diagnosis and treatment of hypersensitivity reactions to cancer chemotherapy. Allergy. 2021;76:2636–40. EAAIC position paper for diagnosis and treatment in HSR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hong DI, Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Banerji A, Castells M, Alvarez-Cuesta E. Controversies in allergy: chemotherapy reactions, desensitize, or delabel? J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8:2907–15. Paper that suggest clinical risk stratification tool for the management of HSR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vázquez-Revuelta P, Martí-Garrido J, Molina-Mata K, Lleonart-Bellfill R, Rey-Salido M, Madrigal-Burgaleta R. Delabeling patients from chemotherapy and biologics allergy: implementing drug provocation testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9:1742–5. This study shows that drug provocation testing (drug challenge) with chemotherapy and biological agents can be implemented with good safety results.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vultaggio A, Castells MC. Hypersensitivity reactions to biologic agents. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34:615–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Akarsu A, Soyer O, Sekerel BE. Hypersensitivity reactions to biologicals: from bench to bedside. Curr Treat options Allergy. 2020;7:71–83. The aim of this review is to distinguish the anaphylaxis from other HSR and provide a management algorithm for the anaphylactic reactions induced by biological agents.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, Bilò MB, Brockow K, Fernández Rivas M, et al. Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy. 2014;69:1026–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Simons FER, Ardusso LR, Bilò MB, Cardona V, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal YM, et al. International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J 2014 7:9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24920969/

  56. Reber LL, Hernandez JD, Galli SJ. The pathophysiology of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140:335–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sala-Cunill A, Luengo O, Cardona V. Biologics and anaphylaxis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;19:439–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Yang BC, Castells M. Medical algorithm: diagnosis and treatment of drug hypersensitivity reactions to biologicals. Allergy. 2020;75:3293–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Matucci A, Vultaggio A, Nencini F, Maggi E. Anaphylactic reactions to biological drugs. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;20:346–51. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the pathogenic mechanisms of biologics-induced anaphylaxis and the diagnostic and prophylactic strategies.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. de las Vecillas Sánchez L, Alenazy LA, Garcia-Neuer M, Castells MC. Drug hypersensitivity and desensitizations: mechanisms and new approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. del Carmen S-S, Simarro M, Castells M. Rapid IgE desensitization is antigen specific and impairs early and late mast cell responses targeting FcεRI internalization. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:1004–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mori F, Saretta F, Bianchi A, Crisafulli G, Caimmi S, Liotti L, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies in children. Medicina. 2020;56:232. Review focused on HSRs associated with the most frequent mAbs in childhood and diagnostic work-up including in vivo and in vitro testing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Castells MC, Tennant NM, Sloane DE, Ida Hsu F, Barrett NA, Hong DI, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: outcomes and safety of rapid desensitization in 413 cases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:574–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Sala-Cunill A, Molina-Molina GJ, Verdesoto JT, Labrador-Horrillo M, Luengo O, Galvan-Blasco P, et al. One-dilution rapid desensitization protocol to chemotherapeutic and biological agents: a five-year experience. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9:4045–54. This article shows that the one-bag desensitization protocol (non-diluted), with chemotherapeutic and biological agents

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Mezzano V, Giavina-Bianchi P, Picard M, Caiado J, Castells M. Drug desensitization in the management of hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy. BioDrugs. 2014;28:133–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Breslow RG, Caiado J, Castells MC. Acetylsalicylic acid and montelukast block mast cell mediated-related symptoms during rapid desensitization. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009;102:155–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Pintea I, Petricau C, Dumitrascu D, Muntean A, Branisteanu DCDE, Branisteanu DCDE, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies: classification and treatment approach. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22:949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Pintea I, Petricau C, Dumitrascu D, Muntean A, Branisteanu DC, Branisteanu DE, et al. Current knowledge and management of hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:600–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Altwerger G, Florsheim EB, Menderes G, Black J, Schwab C, Gressel GM, et al. Impact of carboplatin hypersensitivity and desensitization on patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:2449–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Krishna M, Nadler SG. Immunogenicity to biotherapeutics - the role of anti-drug immune complexes. Front Immunol. 2016;7:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Nye CJS, Wagner A, Kousin-Ezewu O, Jones JL, Coles AJ. A case of anaphylaxis to alemtuzumab. J Neurol. 2019;266:780–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Noguerado-Mellado B, Rojas-Pérez-Ezquerra P, de Sáenz Santa MaríaGarcía M, RodriguezMacías G, Tornero P, Bartolomé B. Anaphylactic shock due to brentuximab-vendotin confirmed by skin test and in vitro tests. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:1427–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Jacquenet S, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Bihain BE. Mammalian meat-induced anaphylaxis: clinical relevance of anti-galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose IgE confirmed by means of skin tests to cetuximab. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:603–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Lo R, Alexander S, Moss J, Siddiqi A, Liu A. Eculizumab hypersensitivity and desensitization in a toddler with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7:2409–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Matucci A, Pratesi S, Petroni G, Nencini F, Virgili G, Milla M, et al. Allergological in vitro and in vivo evaluation of patients with hypersensitivity reactions to infliximab. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43:659–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Donzier L, Deschamps T, Pralong P, Skowron F. Immediate hypersensitivity reaction to ixekizumab in a patient with psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:18–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Muńoz-Cano R, Carnés J, Sanchez-Lopez J, Saiz A, Bartra J, Lopez-Matas MA, et al. Biological agents: new drugs, old problems. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:394–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. de Sáenz Santa MaríaGarcía M, Noguerado-Mellado B, Rojas-Pérez-Ezquerra P, Prieto-García A, Bartolomé-Zavala B, Tornero P. First case of allergy to nivolumab. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5:1140–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Lieberman P, Rahmaoui A, Wong DA. The safety and interpretability of skin tests with omalizumab. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105:493–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Rocchi V, Puxeddu I, Cataldo G, Del Corso I, Tavoni A, Bazzichi L, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to tocilizumab: role of skin tests in diagnosis. Rheumatol (Oxford). 2014;53:1527–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Bavbek S, Ataman Ş, Akinci A, Castells M. Rapid subcutaneous desensitization for the management of local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to etanercept and adalimumab in 12 patients. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. 2015;3(4).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Maria Muñoz-Cano MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gelis, S., Verdesoto, JT., Pascal, M. et al. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies: New Approaches. Curr Treat Options Allergy 9, 394–408 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-022-00318-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-022-00318-1

Keywords

Navigation