Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support Tools in Antimicrobial Stewardship Activities

  • Antimicrobial Stewardship (A Pakyz, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion Statement

The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Disease Society of America (SHEA/IDSA) released guidelines outlining the strategies of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities in 2006. These strategies have been supported by advances in technology, beginning with the novel use of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City, UT. This sophisticated home-grown program allowed for timely and tailored information to be exchanged between the electronic medical record (EMR) and physicians, resulting in reduced drug costs and improved patient outcomes. This CDSS technology became the basis of many third-party vendors that emerged to offer support and improve clinical and fiscal outcomes. However, third-party programs are expensive, require double documentation of interventions within the third-party platform and the EMR, and lack prescriber interaction at the time of prescribing; although they are more customizable and allow for real-time alerts between the microbiology lab and ASP team members. The advancement of the electronic health records (EHR) has expanded the capability for ASPs to use the EHR for clinical stewardship activities rather than outsource it to a third-party vendor. Epic and Cerner currently lead the market in EMR technology and are expected to continue expanding ASP functionality in their foundation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan Jr JE, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(2):159–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alliance U. January 1, 2014 Federal Mandates for Healthcare: Digital Record-Keeping Will Be Required of Public and Private Healthcare Providers. 2014. Accessed August 20, 2014.

  3. Kullar R, Goff DA. Transformation of antimicrobial stewardship programs through technology and informatics. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014;28(2):291–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, et al. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(4):232–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(5):281–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans RS, Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Lundsgaarde HP, Burke JP. Improving empiric antibiotic selection using computer decision support. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(8):878–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Burke JP, Gardner RM, Classen DC. Therapeutic antibiotic monitoring: surveillance using a computerized expert system. Am J Med. 1990;88(1):43–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mullett CJ, Evans RS, Christenson JC, Dean JM. Development and impact of a computerized pediatric antiinfective decision support program. Pediatrics. 2001;108(4):E75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yong MK, Buising KL, Cheng AC, Thursky KA. Improved susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria in an intensive care unit following implementation of a computerized antibiotic decision support system. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(5):1062–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thursky KA, Buising KL, Bak N, et al. Reduction of broad-spectrum antibiotic use with computerized decision support in an intensive care unit. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18(3):224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paul M, Andreassen S, Tacconelli E, et al. Improving empirical antibiotic treatment using TREAT, a computerized decision support system: cluster randomized trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(6):1238–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leibovici L, Kariv G, Paul M. Long-term survival in patients included in a randomized controlled trial of TREAT, a decision support system for antibiotic treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(11):2664–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Micek ST, Heard KM, Gowan M, Kollef MH. Identifying critically ill patients at risk for inappropriate antibiotic therapy: a pilot study of a point-of-care decision support alert. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(8):1832–8. A clinical decision support tool for the ICU to improve empiric antibiotic choice based on previous antibiotic exposure.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohl CA, Luther VP. Antimicrobial stewardship for inpatient facilities. J Hosp Med. 2011;6 Suppl 1:S4–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Evans RS, Burke JP. Implementing antibiotic practice guidelines through computer-assisted decision support: clinical and financial outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(10):884–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Graeme N, Forrest G, Van Schooneveld TC, Kullar R, Schulz LT, Duong P, et al. Use of electronic health records and clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(sup 3):S122–33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Standiford HC, Chan S, Tripoli M, Weekes E, Forrest GN. Antimicrobial stewardship at a large tertiary care academic medical center: cost analysis before, during, and after a 7-year program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(4):338–45. Report of a successful antimicrobial stewardship and early adopter of clinical decision support. This report describes the results of discontinuing a stewardship program.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Calloway S, Akilo HA, Bierman K. Impact of a clinical decision support system on pharmacy clinical interventions, documentation efforts, and costs. Hosp Pharm. 2013;48(9):744–52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hermsen ED, VanSchooneveld TC, Sayles H, Rupp ME. Implementation of a clinical decision support system for antimicrobial stewardship. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(4):412–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McGregor JC, Weekes E, Forrest GN, et al. Impact of a computerized clinical decision support system on reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(4):378–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang AM, Newton D, Kunapuli A, et al. Impact of rapid organism identification via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight combined with antimicrobial stewardship team intervention in adult patients with bacteremia and candidemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(9):1237–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Perez KK, Olsen RJ, Musick WL, et al. Integrating rapid pathogen identification and antimicrobial stewardship significantly decreases hospital costs. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137(9):1247–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. MacDougall C, Polk RE. Antimicrobial stewardship programs in health care systems. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):638–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shojania KG, Yokoe D, Platt R, Fiskio J, Ma'luf N, Bates DW. Reducing vancomycin use utilizing a computer guideline: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(6):554–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patel JA, Esterly JS, Scheetz MH, Postelnick MJ. An analysis of the accuracy of physician-entered indications on computerized antimicrobial orders. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(10):1066–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reed EE, Stevenson KB, West JE, Bauer KA, Goff DA. Impact of formulary restriction with prior authorization by an antimicrobial stewardship program. Virulence. 2013;4(2):158–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. Jama. 2005;293(10):1197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. (HIMSS). HIaMSS. Electronic health records. 2012-2014; http://www.himss.org/library/ehr/?navItemNumber=13261. Available at. Accessed August 20, 2014.

  29. Cook PP, Rizzo S, Gooch M, Jordan M, Fang X, Hudson S. Sustained reduction in antimicrobial use and decrease in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile infections following implementation of an electronic medical record at a tertiary-care teaching hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(1):205–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mainous 3rd AG, Lambourne CA, Nietert PJ. Impact of a clinical decision support system on antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care: quasi-experimental trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(2):317–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Litvin CB, Ornstein SM, Wessell AM, Nemeth LS, Nietert PJ. Use of an electronic health record clinical decision support tool to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections: the ABX-TRIP study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(6):810–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Buckley C. Clinical market share: More than meaningful use. August, 2013. Accessed March 27, 2014

  33. Kullar R, Goff DA, Schulz LT, Fox BC, Rose WE. The "epic" challenge of optimizing antimicrobial stewardship: the role of electronic medical records and technology. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(7):1005–13. A review article describing current tools available in Epic.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pogue JM, Potoski BA, Postelnick M, Mynatt RP, Trupiano DP, Eschenauer GA, et al. Bringing the “power” to Cerner’s PowerChart for antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(3):416–24. A review article describing current tools available in Cerner.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schulz L, Osterby K, Fox B. The use of best practice alerts with the development of an antimicrobial stewardship navigator to promote antibiotic de-escalation in the electronic medical record. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(12):1259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Jordan Rush declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Michael Postelnick declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Lucas Schulz declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Schulz PharmD, BCPS, AQ-ID.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Antimicrobial Stewardship

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rush, J., Postelnick, M. & Schulz, L. Use of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support Tools in Antimicrobial Stewardship Activities. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 7, 90–100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-015-0042-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-015-0042-8

Keywords

Navigation