Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contemporary management of deep caries in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To systematically evaluate the available evidence regarding contemporary management of deep caries in vital primary teeth. This review was carried out to facilitate the development of European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) guidelines on deep caries management of primary teeth in paediatric dentistry.

Methods

A systematic electronic literature search was conducted to locate studies reporting on interventions and medicaments used for the treatment of deep caries in vital primary teeth. To facilitate this, the Cochrane Library (1992 to up to December 6th, 2020), MEDLINE (PubMed, 1946 to December Week 1, 2020), Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, December 6th, 2020); EMBASE (Embase.com, 1974 to December 6th, 2020) and LILACS (1982 to December 6th, 2020) were accessed. Hand search of reference lists of included articles, as well as handbooks and grey literature search was also performed. Study screening was done in duplicate and study inclusions were agreed upon by all authors. Data extraction, and methodological quality and risk of bias assessment were carried out in duplicate for each of the included studies. Overall success rate of each intervention and medicament within the intervention was reported. Meta-analysis was also performed for high-quality studies reporting similar interventions and comparable outcomes in homogeneous population.

Results

A total of 1332 papers were identified. Following the primary and secondary assessment process, 36 papers were included in the review. Of these, 8 papers were deemed to represent 4 individual studies, leaving a total of 32 unique studies eventually included in the final analysis. These studies were further categorized into three main vital pulp treatment methods for analysis: indirect pulp capping (IPC), direct pulp capping (DPC), and pulpotomy (PP). Overall, IPC, DPC and PP interventions have high success rates with the reported clinical success rates higher than radiographic success rates. Medicaments used for IPC and DPC have similar success rates. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), ferric sulfate (FS) and formocresol (FC) PP showed similar success rates, and which were all higher than calcium hydroxide (CH). Majority of included studies (n = 22; 63%) were rated low in terms of their potential risk of bias, 6 studies were rated high (17%), and 7 studies were of unclear risk (20%).

Conclusion

Within the limitations of the studies included, IPC, DPC, and PP can be recommended as effective treatment modalities for primary teeth with deep caries under specific conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airen P, Shigli A, Airen B. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars–2 year follow up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;37(2):143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hiyasat AS, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Al-Omari MA. The radiographic outcomes of direct pulp-capping procedures performed by dental students: a retrospective study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(12):1699–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Oskouei SG. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;34(4):317–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari G, Ranjpour M. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up. Int Endod J. 2010;43(5):413–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asfour MA, Millar BJ, Smith PB. An assessment of the reliability of pulp testing deciduous teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1996;6(3):163–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BaniHani A, Duggal M, Toumba J, Deery C. Outcomes of the conventional and biological treatment approaches for the management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28(1):12–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørndal L, Simon S, Tomson PL, Duncan HF. Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int Endod J. 2019;52(7):949–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Büyükgüral B, Cehreli ZC. Effect of different adhesive protocols vs calcium hydroxide on primary tooth pulp with different remaining dentin thicknesses:24-month results. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(1):91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande L, Bento LW, Rerin SO, Lucas Ede R, Dalpian DM, de Araujo FB. In vivo outcomes of indirect pulp treatment using a self-etching primer versus calcium hydroxide over the demineralized dentin in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;33(2):131–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande L, Falster CA, Di Hipolito V, De Góes MF, Straffon LH, Nör JE, et al. Effect of adhesive restorations over incomplete dentin caries removal: 5-year follow-up study in primary teeth. J Dent Child (chic). 2009;76(2):117–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande L, Bento LW, Dalpian DM, García-Godoy F, de Araujo FB. Indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: 4-year results. Am J Dent. 2010;23(1):34–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casas MJ, Layug MA, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL. Two-year outcomes of primary molar ferric sulfate pulpotomy and root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(2):97–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casas MJ, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL. Long-term outcomes of primary molar ferric sulfate pulpotomy and root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26(1):44–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Celik B, Ataç AS, Cehreli ZC, Uysal S. A randomized trial of mineral trioxide aggregate cements in primary tooth pulpotomies. J Dent Child (chic). 2013;80(3):126–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelik BN, Mutluay MS, Arıkan V, Sarı Ş. The evaluation of MTA and biodentine as a pulpotomy materials for carious exposures in primary teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(2):661–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chailertvanitkul P, Paphangkorakit J, Sooksantisakoonchai N, Pumas N, Pairojamornyoot W, Leela-Apiradee N, Abbott PV. Randomized control trial comparing calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate for partial pulpotomies in cariously exposed pulps of permanent molars. Int Endod J. 2014;47(9):835–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Zhang H, Zhong J, Yan W, Lin B, Ding M, et al. Comparison of indirect pulp treatment and iRoot BP Plus pulpotomy in primary teeth with extremely deep caries: a prospective randomized trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(5):3067–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chompu-inwai P, Boonsongsawat K, Sastraruji T, Sophasri T, Mankaen S, Nondon S, et al. Three incomplete caries removal techniques compared over two years in primary molars with asymptomatic deep caries or reversible pulpitis. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37(5):41–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen GJ. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth. State of the art 2001. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132(3):379–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;119(1):141–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coll JA, Seale NS, Vargas K, Marghalani AA, Al Shamali S, Graham L. Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(1):16–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curzon ME, Pollard MA, Duggal MS. Restoration of primary molars. Br Dent J. 1996;180(7):246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demir T, Cehreli ZC. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of adhesive pulp capping in primary molars following hemostasis with 1.25% sodium hypochlorite: 2-year results. Am J Dent. 2007;20(3):182–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitraki D, Papageorgiou SN, Kotsanos N. Direct pulp capping versus pulpotomy with MTA for carious primary molars: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(5):431–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duggal MS, Nooh A, High A. Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3(3):111–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dye BA, Hsu KL, Afful J. Prevalence and measurement of dental caries in young children. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37(3):200–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem AP, Guven Y, Balli B, Ilhan B, Sepet E, Ulukapi I, et al. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33(2):165–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006;39(12):921–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falster CA, Araujo FB, Straffon LH, Nör JE. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(3):241–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, Mushayt A. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;29(4):307–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández CC, Martínez SS, Jimeno FG, Lorente Rodríguez AI, Mercadé M. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23(6):400–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franzon R, Casagrande L, Pinto AS, García-Godoy F, Maltz M, de Araujo FB. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars: 36 months follow-up. Am J Dent. 2007;20(3):189–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franzon R, Guimarães LF, Magalhães CE, Haas AN, Araujo FB. Outcomes of one-step incomplete and complete excavation in primary teeth: a 24-month randomized controlled trial. Caries Res. 2014;48(5):376–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuks A, Kupietzki A, Guelmann M. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Casamassimo P, Fields H, McTigue D, Nowak A, editors. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 5th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier/Saunders; 2013. p. 338–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guven Y, Aksakal SD, Avcu N, Unsal G, Tuna EB, Aktoren O. Success rates of pulpotomies in primary molars using calcium silicate-based materials: a randomized control trial. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4059703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hamanaka EF, Poi WR, Salzedas LM, Alves LC, Panzarini SR, Sonoda CK, et al. A method for the geometric standardization of intraoral radiographs for long-term follow up of replanted teeth: a case report. Dent Traumatol. 2013;29(2):121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org.

  • Hori A, Poureslami HR, Parirokh M, Mirzazadeh A, Abbott P. The ability of pulp sensibility tests to evaluate the pulp status in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21(6):441–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu S, Meyer B, Duggal M. A silver renaissance in dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(4):221–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, Hollweck R, Crispin A, Hickel R, et al. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques–randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2005;84(12):1144–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huth KC, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, Wolf P, Ilie N, Hickel R, Paschos E. Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3-year randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(4):1243–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali Z, Alavi V, Najafpour E, Aminabadi NA, Shirazi S. Randomized controlled trial of pulpotomy in primary molars using MTA and formocresol compared to 3Mixtatin: a novel biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(5):361–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jayam C, Mitra M, Mishra J, Bhattacharya B, Jana B. Evaluation and comparison of white mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol medicaments in primary tooth pulpotomy: clinical and radiographic study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(1):13–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khorakian F, Mazhari F, Asgary S, Sahebnasagh M, Alizadeh Kaseb A, Movahhed T, et al. Two-year outcomes of electrosurgery and calcium-enriched mixture pulpotomy in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(4):223–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lunder N, von der Fehr FR. Approximal cavitation related to bite-wing image and caries activity in adolescents. Caries Res. 1996;30(2):143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J. 2007;40(6):427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malekafzali B, Shekarchi F, Asgary S. Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomised clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2011;12(3):189–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi JJ, de Araujo FB, Fröner AM, Straffon LH, Nör JE. Indirect pulp capping in the primary dentition: a 4 year follow-up study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006;31(2):68–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mejàre IA, Axelsson S, Davidson T, Frisk F, Hakeberg M, Kvist T, et al. Diagnosis of the condition of the dental pulp: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2012;45(7):597–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro J, Day P, Duggal M, Morgan C, Rodd H. Pulpal status of human primary teeth with physiological root resorption. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19(1):16–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti AB, Sakai VT, Oliveira TM, Fornetti AP, Santos CF, Machado MA, et al. The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2008;41(7):547–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nematollahi H, Noorollahian H, Bagherian A, Yarbakht M, Nematollahi S. Mineral trioxide aggregate partial pulpotomy versus formocresol pulpotomy: a randomized, split-mouth, controlled clinical trial with 24 months follow-up. Pediatr Dent. 2018;40(3):184–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ni Chaollai A, Monteiro J, Duggal MS. The teaching of management of the pulp in primary molars in Europe: a preliminary investigation in Ireland and the UK. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009;10(2):98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noorollahian H. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars. Br Dent J. 2008;204(11):E20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pozos-Guillén A, Chavarría-Bolaños D, Garrocho-Rangel A. Split-mouth design in paediatric dentistry clinical trials. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(1):61–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16(Suppl 1):15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai VT, Moretti AB, Oliveira TM, Fornetti AP, Santos CF, Machado MA et al. Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2009;207(3):E5; discussion 128–129.

  • Santamaría R, Innes N. Sealing carious tissue in primary teeth using crowns: the Hall technique. Monogr Oral Sci. 2018;27:113–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smaïl-Faugeron V, Glenny AM, Courson F, Durieux P, Muller-Bolla M, Fron CH. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):C003220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldani F, Foley J. An assessment of rubber dam usage amongst specialists in paediatric dentistry practising within the UK. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(1):50–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trairatvorakul C, Koothiratrakarn A. Calcium hydroxide partial pulpotomy is an alternative to formocresol pulpotomy based on a 3-year randomized trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012;22(5):382–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuna D, Olmez A. Clinical long-term evaluation of MTA as a direct pulp capping material in primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2008;41(4):273–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Li C, Yuan H, Wong MC, Zou J, Shi Z, et al. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9(9):CD009858.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim C, Basak F, Akgun OM, Polat GG, Altun C. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the effectiveness of formocresol, mineral trioxide aggregate, portland cement, and enamel matrix derivative in primary teeth pulpotomies: a two year follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(1):14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This systematic review is commissioned by the European Academy for Paediatric Dentistry, to facilitate the development of European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) guidelines on deep caries management of primary teeth in paediatric dentistry. ES, HJT, KS, MD and SG were involved in formulating the search terms and strategy. Literature search was conducted by DK. Data analysis and synthesis were carried out by all authors. Meta-analysis was carried out by DK. All authors wrote and critically revised the work for content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sotiria Gizani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stratigaki, E., Tong, H.J., Seremidi, K. et al. Contemporary management of deep caries in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 23, 695–725 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00666-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00666-7

Keywords

Navigation