Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adhesion of three types of fissure sealant in saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated conditions: an in vitro study

  • Original Scientific Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the proportion of microleakage (PM), shear bond strength (SBS), and the fissure sealant (FS) interface by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in three kinds of FS when the enamel surfaces were contaminated with saliva.

Methods

198 sound third molar teeth were randomly divided into three pretreatment condition groups (n = 66): dry, saliva contamination removed by cotton pellet, or saliva removed by air-drying. A resin-based FS (Clinpro™), amorphous calcium phosphate-containing FS (Aegis®), or glass ionomer-based FS (Fuji Triage®) was applied on the treated enamel, and PM and SBS were assessed. Two specimens from each group were observed with SEM. p values < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Glass ionomer-based FS showed the highest PM in all three surface conditions (p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant). No significant difference in PM was observed between resin-based FS and amorphous calcium phosphate-containing FS (p > 0.05). Resin-based FS showed significantly greater SBS in all three surface conditions compared to glass ionomer-based FS. SEM observations showed that saliva contamination led to gaps at the enamel–sealant interface.

Conclusion

Neither cotton pellet-drying nor air-drying effectively removed saliva from the contaminated enamel surface. Glass ionomer-based FS showed the highest PM and the lowest SBS in contaminated and noncontaminated conditions. The highest SBS was obtained with resin-based FS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ACP:

Amorphous calcium phosphate

Bis-GMA:

Bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate

FS:

Fissure sealant

MPa:

Megapascals

PM:

Proportion of microleakage

SBS:

Shear bond strength

SD:

Standard deviation

SEM:

Scanning electron microscopy

UDMA:

Urethane dimethacrylate

References

  • Al-Jobair A. Scanning electron microscope analysis of sealant penetration and adaptation in contaminated fissures. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013;31:169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsaffar A, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Beiraghi S. Protective effect of pit and fissure sealants on demineralization of adjacent enamel. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:491–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C, Yazici AR, Hardigan PC, Alempour S, Evans D, Ocanto R. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143:115–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin R, Arathi R. Comparative evaluation for microleakage between Fuji-VII glass ionomer cement and light-cured unfilled resin: a combined in vivo in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007;25:86–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asselin ME, Fortin D, Sitbon Y, Rompre PH. Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30:29–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barroso JM, Torres CP, Lessa FC, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Borsatto MC. Shear bond strength of pit-and-fissure sealants to saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated enamel. J Dent Child (chic). 2005;72:95–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai KR, Kim H-R, Chae H-J. Compliance with saliva collection protocol in healthy volunteers: strategies for managing risk and errors. Int J Med Sci. 2018;15:823–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsatto MC, Corona SA, Alves AG, Chimello DT, Catirse AB, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of salivary contamination on marginal microleakage of pit and fissure sealants. Am J Dent. 2004;17:365–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary P, Tandon S, Ganesh M, Mehra A. Evaluation of the remineralization potential of amorphous calcium phosphate and fluoride containing pit and fissure sealants using scanning electron microscopy. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo S, Beretta M. Dental Sealants Part 3: Which material? Efficiency and effectiveness. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2018;19:247–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duangthip D, Lussi A. Microleakage and penetration ability of resin sealant versus bonding system when applied following contamination. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:505–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fumes AC, Longo DL, De Rossi A, Fidalgo T, De Paula ESFWG, Borsatto MC & Kuchler EC. Microleakage of Sealants after Phosphoric Acid, Er: YAG Laser and Air Abrasion Enamel Conditioning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41: 167–172.

  • Ganesh M, Shobha T. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of Fuji VII and concise as pit and fissure sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantovitz KR, Pascon FM, Alonso RC, Nobre-Dos-Santos M, Rontani RM. Marginal adaptation of pit and fissure sealants after thermal and chemical stress. A SEM Study Am J Dent. 2008;21:377–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S. Evaluation of shear bond strength, penetration ability, microleakage and remineralisation capacity of glass ionomer-based fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016;17:17–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naaman R, El-Housseiny AA & Alamoudi N. The Use of Pit and Fissure Sealants-A Literature Review. Dent J (Basel). 2017;5.

  • Parco T, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Beiraghi S. Microleakage of self-etching sealant on noncontaminated and saliva-contaminated enamel. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:479–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng Y, Stark PC, Rich A Jr, Loo CY. Marginal microleakage of triage sealant under different moisture contamination. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:203–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Lajarin L, Cortes-Lillo O, Garcia-Ballesta C, Cozar-Hidalgo A. Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a comparative study. J Dent Child (chic). 2003;70:24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. Elsevier; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rirattanapong P, Vongsavan K, Surarit R. Shear bond strength of some sealants under saliva contamination. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2011;42:463–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rirattanapong P, Vongsavan K, Surarit R. Microleakage of two fluoride-releasing sealants when applied following saliva contamination. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2013;44:931–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sen Tunc E, Bayrak S, Tuloglu N, Ertas E. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength of different fissure sealants to bovine enamel. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek Derelioglu S, Yilmaz Y, Celik P, Carikcioglu B, Keles S. Bond strength and microleakage of self-adhesive and conventional fissure sealants. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:530–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED, Eidelman N. Dental composites based on hybrid and surface-modified amorphous calcium phosphates. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topaloglu Ak A, Riza AA. Effect of saliva contamination on microleakage of three different pit and fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010;11:93–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal M, Oznurhan F, Kapdan A, Durer S. A comparative clinical study of three fissure sealants on primary teeth: 24-month results. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39:113–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JT, Crall JJ, Fontana M, Gillette EJ, Novy BB, Dhar V, Donly K, Hewlett ER, Quinonez RB, Chaffin J, Crespin M, Iafolla T, Siegal MD, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Carrasco-Labra A. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the american dental association and the american academy of pediatric dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(672–682):e12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawaideh FI, Owais AI, Kawaja W. Ability of pit and fissure sealant-containing amorphous calcium phosphate to inhibit enamel demineralization. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9:10–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Tang T, Zhang Z-L, Liang B, Wang X-M & Fu B-P. Improvement of enamel bond strengths for conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers: acid-etching vs. conditioning. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14: 1013–1024.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Vice-Chancellery of Research of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, for supporting this research (Grant No. 96-15804, 97-18231). The authors also thank Dr. M. Vossoughi of the Center for Improvement, Shiraz Dental School, for the statistical analysis, and K. Shashok (AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean) for help with the English in the manuscript. This manuscript reports research done in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree awarded to one of the authors, Dr. Tayebeh Doroudizadeh.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by vice-chancellery of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Memarpour: conceptualized and designed the study, supervised data collection, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr. Rafiee: conceptualized and designed the study, collected and interpreted the data, drafted the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr. Fereshteh Shafiei, Dr. Tayebeh Dorudizadeh, and Dr. Sahba Kamran: conceptualized the study, participated in data acquisition and analysis, revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azade Rafiee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR.SUMS.REC.1397.924).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Memarpour, M., Rafiee, A., Shafiei, F. et al. Adhesion of three types of fissure sealant in saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated conditions: an in vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 22, 813–821 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00626-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00626-1

Keywords

Navigation