Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paediatric dentist’s ability to detect and diagnose dental trauma using 2D versus 3D imaging

  • Original Scientific Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Visualisation of the third dimension has been reported to increase effectiveness of correctly diagnosing traumatic dental injuries.

Aim

To assess the ability of paediatric dentists to detect and diagnose Traumatic Dental Injuries (TDI) using two different imaging modalities, intraoral radiographs (2D) and CBCT scans (3D). In addition, observer’s confidence regarding the obtained diagnosis, using either technique, was assessed.

Material and methods

Both 2D and 3D images of 20 dental trauma cases in children were presented in random order to a panel of thirteen paediatric dentists. Observers received instructions for the screening of the images for radiographic findings related to dental trauma, using structured scoring sheets for 2D and 3D images. Observed data were compared to those recorded by two experienced benchmark observers. A ten-point scale was used for assessing observer’s confidence regarding their final diagnosis using 2D versus 3D images.

Results

Performance of individual observers showed wide variation. Statistical significance was reached for correctly detected and correctly diagnosed findings (p = 0.02), in favor of 3D. Most of the observers reported comparable confidence using 2D and 3D, two observers were more confident using 3D and one observer was more confident using 2D.

Conclusions

Paediatric dentist’s ability to detect and diagnose findings in patients with TDI was higher on 3D images. Most observers showed a similar confidence score of their diagnostic performance both on 2D and on 3D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Salehi SK, Horner K. Impact of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on diagnostic thinking in endodontics of posterior teeth: a before—after study. J Dent. 2016;53:57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen F, Andreasen J, Tsukiboshi M, Cohenca N (2019) Examination and diagnosis of dental injuries, in Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries of the teeth (5th ed), Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard. Chapter 12; Pp 295326.

  • Balasundaram A, Shah P, Hoen M, Wheater M, Bringas J, Gartner A, Geist J. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in predicting treatment decision for periapical lesions: a clinical study. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belmans N, Gilles L, Vermeesen R, Virag P, Hedesiu M, Salmon B, Baatout S, Lucas S, Lambrichts I, Jacobs R, Moreels M, DIMITRA Research Group. Quantification of DNA double strand breaks and oxidation response in children and adults undergoing dental CBCT scan. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):2113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein MM, Wölner-Hanssen AB, Sendi P. Comparison of intraoral radiography and limited cone beam computed tomography for the assessment of root-fractured permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25:571–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Jacobs R, Levring Jäghagen E, Lindh C, Baksi G, Schulze D, Schulze R. Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2014;43:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohenca N, Silberman A. Contemporary imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic dental injuries: a review. Dent Traumatol. 2017;33:321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohenca N, Simon J, Roges R, Morag Y, Malfaz J. Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 1: traumatic injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2007;23:95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva E, de Fátima NM, Queiroz M, Leles C. Factors influencing student’s performance in a Brazilian dental school. Braz Dent. 2010;21:80–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan MS, Callea M, Kusdhany LS, Aras A, Maharani DA, Mandasari M, Adiatman M, Yavuz I. The evaluation of root fracture with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): an Epidemiological Study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10:e41-48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning D, Heath C, Suls JM. Flawed self-assessment: implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004;5:69–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutra KL, Haas L, Porporatti AL, Flores-Mir C, Nascimento Santos J, Mezzomo LA, Corrêa M, De Luca CG. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional radiography on apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2016;42:356–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ee J, Fayad M, Johnson B. Comparison of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning decisions using cone-beam volumetric tomography versus periapical radiography. J Endod. 2014;40:910–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EzEldeen M, Stratis A, Coucke W, Codari M, Politis C, Jacobs R. As low dose as sufficient quality: optimization of cone-beam computed tomographic scanning protocol for tooth autotransplantation planning and follow-up in children. J Endod. 2017;43:210–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores MT, Andersson L, Andreasen JO, et al. Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries. I. Fractures and luxations of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2007;23:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendor U. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries a 12 year review of the literature. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24:603–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner K, Barry S, Dave M, Dixon C, Littlewood A, Pang CL, Sengupta A, Srinivasan V. Diagnostic efficacy of cone beam computed tomography in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21:407–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal MS, Loizides Spyridonos M, Rajasekharan S, Sobczak M, Stratigaki E, Van Acker JWG, Aps JKM, Horner K, Tsiklakis K. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020;21:375–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kullman L, Al SM. Guidelines for dental radiography immediately after a dento-alveolar trauma, a systematic literature review. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28:193–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam R. Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic dental injuries: a review of the literature. Aus Dent J. 2016;61(1 Suppl):4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima TF, Gamba TO, Zaia AA, Soares AJ. Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of root resorption. Aust Dent J. 2016;61:425–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Pilosof N, Karawani M, Wigler R, Kaufman AY, Teich ST. Occurrence and timing of complications following traumatic dental injuries: a retrospective study in a dental trauma department. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8:e429-436.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mota de Almeida FJ, Knutsson K, Flygare L. The effect of cone beam CT (CBCT) on therapeutic decision-making in endodontics. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2014;43:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mota de Almeida FJ, Knutsson K, Flygare L. The impact of cone beam computed tomography on the choice of endodontic diagnosis. Int Endod J. 2015;48:564–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oenning A, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B, DIMITRA Research Group (2018) Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 48:308316. http://www.dimitra.be.

  • Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, Cockmartin L, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K. Sedentexct project consortium. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:267–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels R, Cockmartin L, Ivanauskaité D, Urboniené A, Gavala S, Donta C, Tsiklakis K, Jacobs R, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Horner K. The SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Estimating cancer risk from dental cone-beam CT exposures based on skin dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:3877–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plohl N. Musil B Do I know as much as I think I do? The Dunning-Kruger effect, overclaiming, and the illusion of knowledge. Horizons Psychol. 2018;27:20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(Suppl 1):46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel J, Sacks B, Pennington C, Welsh J. Dose optimization to minimize radiation risk for children undergoing CT and nuclear medicine imaging is misguided and detrimental. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:865–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita FC, Previdelli ITS, Pavan NNO, Endo MS. Retrospective study on sequelae in traumatized permanent teeth. Eur J Dent. 2017;11:275–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yendreka VC, Fonseca GM. A “borderline” dental trauma with 12 y of evolution justifying CBCT as diagnostic method. Biomed Res. 2018;29:2800–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all participating paediatric dentists and to Wim Coucke for his contribution to data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DD, ML and GVG designed the research setup; ML and GVG collected the data; ML, GVG, DD and RJ analysed and interpreted the data; G.V.G. drafted the paper; and all authors critically revised the manuscript prior to its submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Van Gorp.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest and completed the conflict of interest disclosure.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Gorp, G., Lambrechts, M., Jacobs, R. et al. Paediatric dentist’s ability to detect and diagnose dental trauma using 2D versus 3D imaging. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 22, 699–705 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00611-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00611-8

Keywords

Navigation