Abstract
Valid interpretations require precise and accurate determination of magnetotelluric impedance. Although remote reference magnetotellurics has been extensively investigated, majority of these studies have focused on the non-correlation between noise and signal or between the noise in the base station and that in the reference station. Few works have explored the correlation between magnetic signals in the base station and in the reference station. This study analyzes the effects of remote reference magnetotellurics on the sounding curve under different noise intensities in the base station. Results showed that regular remote reference magnetotellurics induce a limited quality-improving effect on the sounding curve and fail to satisfy the further data processing requirements at a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), suggesting that regular remote reference magnetotelluric methods cannot obtain an accurate transfer function under a low SNR for a time series. Comparison of various magnetic field data revealed that a strong correlation exists among magnetic signals 60 km apart at the Longmenshan area. Thus, the remote reference magnetotelluric method based on the magnetic field correlation between the base and reference stations is proposed to screen the power spectrum and undo the noise. The effectiveness and correctness of the proposed method are validated by the results of the theoretical and field data processing and of the intermediate data analysis, further proving that the remote reference magnetotelluric method based on magnetic field correlation is superior to the regular remote reference magnetotelluric method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cai JH (2013) Magnetotelluric response function estimation based on Hilbert–Huang transform. Pure Appl Geophys 170(11):1899–1911
Chave AD, Thomson DJ (1989) Some comments on magnetotelluric response function estimation. J Geophys Res 94(B10):14215–14225
Chave AD, Thomson DJ, Ander ME (1987) On the robust estimation of power spectra, coherences, and transfer functions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 92(B1):633–648
Clarke J, Gamble TD, Goubau WM et al (1983) Remote-reference magnetotellurics: equipment and procedures. Geophys Prospect 31(1):149–170
Deng Q, Zhang P, Ran Y, Yang X, Min W, Chu Q (2003) Basic characteristics of active tectonics of China. Sci China (Ser D Earth Sci) 46:356–372
Egbert GD (1997) Robust multiple-station magnetotelluric data processing. Geophys J Int 130(2):475–496
Egbert GD, Booker JR (1986) Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer functions. Geophys J R Astron Soc 87(1):173–194
Gamble TD, Goubau WM, Clarke J (1979) Magnetotellurics with a remote reference. Geophysics 44(1):53–68
Garcia X, Jones AG (2008) Robust processing of magnetotelluric data in the AMT dead band using the continuous wavelet transform. Geophysics 73(6):F223
Kappler KN (2012) A data variance technique for automated despiking of magnetotelluric data with a remote reference. Geophys Prospect 60(1):179–191
Larsen JC (1989) Transfer functions: smooth robust estimates by least-squares and remote reference methods. Geophys J Int 99(3):645–663
Muñoz G, Ritter O (2013) Pseudo-remote reference processing of magnetotelluric data: a fast and efficient data acquisition scheme for local arrays. Geophys Prospect 61:300–316
Neukirch M, Garcia X (2014) Nonstationary magnetotelluric data processing with instantaneous parameter. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:1634–1654
Oettinger G, Haak V, Larsen JC (2001) Noise reduction in magnetotelluric time-series with a new signal–noise separation method and its application to a field experiment in the Saxonian Granulite Massif. Geophys J Int 146(3):659–669
Ritter O, Junge A, Dawes G (1998) New equipment and processing for magnetotelluric remote reference observations. Geophys J Int 132(3):535–548
Shalivahan, Bhattacharya BB (2002) How remote can the far remote reference site for magnetotelluric measurements be? J Geophys Res Atmos 107(B6):1
Shalivahan, Sinharay RK, Bhattacharya BB (2006) Remote reference magnetotelluric impedance estimation of wideband data using hybrid algorithm. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 111(B11):B11103
Smirnov MY (2003) Magnetotelluric data processing with a robust statistical procedure having a high breakdown point. Geophys J Int 152(1):1–7
Sutarno D, Vozoff K (1991) Phase-smoothed robust M-estimation of magnetotelluric impedance functions. Geophysics 56(12):1999–2007
Trad DO, Travassos JM (2000) Wavelet filtering of magnetotelluric data. Geophysics 65(2):482
Weckmann U, Magunia A, Ritter O (2005) Effective noise separation for magnetotelluric single site data processing using a frequency domain selection scheme. Geophys J Int 161(3):635–652
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant 2017M610611), Natural Science Funds of Southwest University of Science and Technology (Grant 15zx7135), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant 2014AA06A612), Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Grant 41504061). We also thank editor Dr. Endre Turai and two anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments that helped us improve the quality of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gang, Z., Xianguo, T., Xuben, W. et al. Remote reference magnetotelluric processing algorithm based on magnetic field correlation. Acta Geod Geophys 53, 45–60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-017-0203-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-017-0203-y