Skip to main content
Log in

Advantages of Single-Stranded DNA Over Double-Stranded DNA Library Preparation for Capturing Cell-Free Tumor DNA in Plasma

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) libraries have been shown to enrich shorter and more degraded DNA fragments than double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) libraries.

Objective

In this study, we evaluated whether ssDNA libraries captured more circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA).

Methods

We prepared dsDNA, ssDNA and pure-ssDNA (capture the preexisting ssDNA) libraries using ten plasma cfDNA samples. After low-pass whole genome sequencing, we calculated a duplicate rate to estimate library complexity and compared the library insert sizes between the different library methods. Finally, we estimated the ctDNA content and plasma genomic abnormality (PGA) score, an indicator of ctDNA burden.

Results

27 libraries were prepared and sequenced from the ten cfDNA samples. The duplicate rate in the ssDNA and pure-ssDNA libraries was significantly lower than in the dsDNA libraries (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). ctDNA content and PGA scores were consistently higher in the ssDNA and pure-ssDNA libraries than in the matched dsDNA libraries (p < 0.005). The higher ctDNA content in ssDNA libraries was associated with smaller library insert size.

Conclusions

ssDNA libraries preserve more diversity and capture more ctDNA than dsDNA libraries. The ssDNA library method is preferred when performing genomic analysis of ctDNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Thierry AR, El Messaoudi S, Gahan PB, Anker P, Stroun M. Origins, structures, and functions of circulating DNA in oncology. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(3):347–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Siravegna G, Marsoni S, Siena S, Bardelli A. Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(9):531–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Corcoran RB, Chabner BA. Application of cell-free DNA analysis to cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(18):1754–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heitzer E, Ulz P, Geigl JB. Circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy for cancer. Clin Chem. 2015;61(1):112–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Otandault A, Anker P, Dache AAZ, Guillaumon V, Meddeb R, Pastor B, et al. Recent advances in circulating nucleic acids in oncology. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(3):374–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorgannezhad L, Umer M, Islam MN, Nguyen NT, Shiddiky MJA. Circulating tumor DNA and liquid biopsy: opportunities, challenges, and recent advances in detection technologies. Lab Chip. 2018;18(8):1174–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gansauge MT, Meyer M. Single-stranded DNA library preparation for the sequencing of ancient or damaged DNA. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(4):737–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burnham P, Kim MS, Agbor-Enoh S, Luikart H, Valantine HA, Khush KK, et al. Single-stranded DNA library preparation uncovers the origin and diversity of ultrashort cell-free DNA in plasma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27859.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stiller M, Sucker A, Griewank K, Aust D, Baretton GB, Schadendorf D, et al. Single-strand DNA library preparation improves sequencing of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancer DNA. Oncotarget. 2016;7(37):59115–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mouliere F, Robert B, Arnau Peyrotte E, Del Rio M, Ychou M, Molina F, et al. High fragmentation characterizes tumour-derived circulating DNA. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Underhill HR, Kitzman JO, Hellwig S, Welker NC, Daza R, Baker DN, et al. Fragment Length of Circulating Tumor DNA. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(7):e1006162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang P, Chan CW, Chan KC, Cheng SH, Wong J, Wong VW, et al. Lengthening and shortening of plasma DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(11):E1317–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mouliere F, Chandrananda D, Piskorz AM, Moore EK, Morris J, Ahlborn LB, et al. Enhanced detection of circulating tumor DNA by fragment size analysis. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(466):eaat4921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xia S, Kohli M, Du M, Dittmar RL, Lee A, Nandy D, et al. Plasma genetic and genomic abnormalities predict treatment response and clinical outcome in advanced prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(18):16411–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li J, Dittmar RL, Xia S, Zhang H, Du M, Huang CC, et al. Cell-free DNA copy number variations in plasma from colorectal cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2017;11(8):1099–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Diskin SJ, Li M, Hou C, Yang S, Glessner J, Hakonarson H, et al. Adjustment of genomic waves in signal intensities from whole-genome SNP genotyping platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(19):e126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xia S, Huang CC, Le M, Dittmar R, Du M, Yuan T, et al. Genomic variations in plasma cell free DNA differentiate early stage lung cancers from normal controls. Lung Cancer. 2015;90(1):78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vagner T, Spinelli C, Minciacchi VR, Balaj L, Zandian M, Conley A, et al. Large extracellular vesicles carry most of the tumour DNA circulating in prostate cancer patient plasma. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1505403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanchez C, Snyder MW, Tanos R, Shendure J, Thierry AR. New insights into structural features and optimal detection of circulating tumor DNA determined by single-strand DNA analysis. NPJ Genom Med. 2018;3:31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moser T, Ulz P, Zhou Q, Perakis S, Geigl JB, Speicher MR, et al. Single-stranded DNA library preparation does not preferentially enrich circulating tumor DNA. Clin Chem. 2017;63(10):1656–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vong JSL, Tsang JCH, Jiang P, Lee WS, Leung TY, Chan KCA, et al. Single-stranded DNA library preparation preferentially enriches short maternal DNA in maternal plasma. Clin Chem. 2017;63(5):1031–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Snyder MW, Kircher M, Hill AJ, Daza RM, Shendure J. Cell-free dna comprises an in vivo nucleosome footprint that informs its tissues-of-origin. Cell. 2016;164(1–2):57–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Molecular Pathology Core in Medical College of Wisconsin for timely sequencing service. We acknowledge the scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) (201508230031 to JZ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing Zhu or Liang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute of Health (R01CA212097) to LW; the University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province (UNPYSCT-2017056), Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (YQ2019H002) and the Fund Program of Heilongjiang Province for Selected Returned Overseas Professionals to JZ.

Conflict of Interest

JZ, JH, PZ, QL, MK, CH and LW have no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure S1

Correlation between insert size difference and ctDNA burden difference. For ssDNA and their matched dsDNA libraries, a positive correlation (r = 0.673, p = 0.017) was found between insert size difference and ctDNA burden difference

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 9 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 9 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (XLSX 9 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (XLSX 9 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (XLSX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J., Huang, J., Zhang, P. et al. Advantages of Single-Stranded DNA Over Double-Stranded DNA Library Preparation for Capturing Cell-Free Tumor DNA in Plasma. Mol Diagn Ther 24, 95–101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-019-00429-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-019-00429-7

Navigation