References
Caldwell AR, Vigotsky AD, Nuckols G, Boardley I, Schmidt J, Tenan M, et al. Moving sport and exercise science forward: a call for the adoption of more transparent research practices. Sports Med. 2020;50(3):449–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1.
Foster ED, Deardorff A. Open science framework (OSF). J Med Libr Assoc. 2017;105:203–6. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88.
Stodden V, Seiler J, Ma Z. An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility. PNAS. 2018;115:2584–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708290115.
Rowhani-Farid A, Barnett AG. Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e011784. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011784.
Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
Shrout PE, Rodgers JL. Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Ann Rev Psychol. 2018;69:487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845.
Wallach JD, Boyack KW, Ioannidis JPA. Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2006930. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006930.
Allen C, Mehler DMA. Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246.
Choudhury S, Fishman JR, McGowan ML, Juengst ET. Big data, open science and the brain: lessons learned from genomics. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00239.
Open Science Framework (OSF). Available from: https://osf.io/. Accessed March 2020.
Journal Rankings on Sports Science. Available from: https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=3699&year=2018. Accessed March 2020.
Brown AW, Kaiser KA, Allison DB. Issues with data and analyses: errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions. PNAS Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:2563–70. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708279115.
Tierney NJ, Ram K (2020) A realistic guide to making data available alongside code to improve reproducibility. arXiv:2002.11626
Sainani KL, Lohse KR, Jones PR, Vickers A. Magnitude-based Inference is not Bayesian and is not a valid method of inference. Scandinavian J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29:1428–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13491.
Tenan MS, Vigotsky A, Caldwell AR. On the statistical properties of the Dankel-Loenneke method. Sportrxiv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.31236/osf.io/8ndhg.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the feedback provided by Christoph Schneider.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This work was not financially supported.
Conflict of interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Data and code availability
The data and code that support this article are available at https://github.com/SciBorgo/Open-data-in-sports-science. Details of the systematic search can be accessed at the same address.
Additional information
This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01227-1.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borg, D.N., Bon, J.J., Sainani, K.L. et al. Comment on: ‘Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices’. Sports Med 50, 1551–1553 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01298-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01298-5