Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Criteria for Progressing Rehabilitation and Determining Return-to-Play Clearance Following Hamstring Strain Injury: A Systematic Review

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rehabilitation progression and return-to-play (RTP) decision making following hamstring strain injury (HSI) can be challenging for clinicians, owing to the competing demands of reducing both convalescence and the risk of re-injury. Despite an increased focus on the RTP process following HSI, little attention has been paid to rehabilitation progression and RTP criteria, and subsequent time taken to RTP and re-injury rates.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review is to identify rehabilitation progression and RTP criteria implemented following HSI and examine the subsequent time taken to RTP and rates of re-injury.

Methods

A systematic literature review of databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies of participants with acute HSI reporting time taken to RTP and rates of re-injury after a minimum 6-month follow-up. General guidelines and specific criteria for rehabilitation progression were identified for each study. In addition, RTP criteria were identified and categorised as performance tests, clinical assessments, isokinetic dynamometry or the Askling H-test.

Results

Nine studies were included with a total of 601 acute HSI confirmed by clinical examination or magnetic resonance imaging within 10 days of initial injury. A feature across all nine studies was that the injured individual’s perception of pain was used to guide rehabilitation progression, whilst clinical assessments and performance tests were the most frequently implemented RTP criteria. Mean RTP times were lowest in studies implementing isokinetic dynamometry as part of RTP decision making (12–25 days), whilst those implementing the Askling H-test had the lowest rates of re-injury (1.3–3.6%).

Conclusions

This systematic review highlights the strong emphasis placed on the alleviation of pain to allow HSI rehabilitation progression, and the reliance on subjective clinical assessments and performance tests as RTP criteria. These results suggest a need for more objective and clinically practical criteria, allowing a more evidence-based approach to rehabilitation progression, and potentially reducing the ambiguity involved in the RTP decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orchard JW, Seward H, Orchard JJ. Results of 2 decades of injury surveillance and public release of data in the Australian Football League. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(4):734–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekstrand J, Hagglund M, Walden M. Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(7):553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Opar D, Drezner J, Shield A, et al. Acute injuries in track and field athletes: a 3-year observational study at the Penn relays carnival with epidemiology and medical coverage implications. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):816–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elliott MC, Zarins B, Powell JW, et al. Hamstring muscle strains in professional football players: a 10-year review. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(4):843–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Woods C. The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football: analysis of hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(1):36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Timmins RG, Shield AJ, Williams MD, et al. Biceps femoris long head architecture: a reliability and retrospective injury study. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2015;47(5):905–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Opar DA, Williams MD, Timmins RG, et al. Knee flexor strength and bicep femoris electromyographical activity is lower in previously strained hamstrings. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23(3):696–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Opar DA, Williams MD, Timmins RG, et al. Rate of torque and electromyographic development during anticipated eccentric contraction is lower in previously strained hamstrings. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):116–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Silder A, Heiderscheit BC, Thelen DG, et al. MR observations of long-term musculotendon remodeling following a hamstring strain injury. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(12):1101–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Opar DA, Piatkowski T, Williams MD, et al. A novel device using the Nordic hamstring exercise to assess eccentric knee flexor strength: a reliability and retrospective injury study. J Orthop Sport Phys. 2013;43(9):636–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maniar N, Shield AJ, Williams MD, et al. Hamstring strength and flexibility after hamstring strain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(15):909–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Opar DA, Williams MD, Shield AJ. Hamstring strain injuries: factors that lead to injury and re-injury. Sports Med. 2012;42(3):209–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freckleton G, Pizzari T. Risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury in sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(6):351–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bourne MN, Opar DA, Williams MD, et al. Eccentric knee flexor strength and risk of hamstring injuries in rugby union: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(11):2663–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hickey J, Shield AJ, Williams MD, et al. The financial cost of hamstring strain injuries in the Australian Football League. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(8):729–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagglund M, Walden M, Magnusson H, et al. Injuries affect team performance negatively in professional football: an 11-year follow-up of the UEFA Champions League injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(12):738–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Creighton DW, Shrier I, Shultz R, et al. Return-to-play in sport: a decision-based model. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20(5):379–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Orchard J, Best TM. The management of muscle strain injuries: an early return versus the risk of recurrence. Clin J Sport Med. 2002;12(1):3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shrier I. Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance (StAART) framework for return-to-play decision-making. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(20):1311–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarvinen TA, Jarvinen TL, Kaariainen M, et al. Muscle injuries: biology and treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(5):745–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maffulli N, Oliva F, Frizziero A, et al. ISMuLT guidelines for muscle injuries. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(4):241–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Page P. Pathophysiology of acute exercise-induced muscular injury: clinical implications. J Athl Train. 1995;30(1):29–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernandes TL, Pedrinelli A, Hernandez AJ. Muscle injury: physiopathology, diagnosis, treatment and clinical presentation. Rev Bras Ortop. 2011;46(3):247–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarvinen TA, Jarvinen M, Kalimo H. Regeneration of injured skeletal muscle after the injury. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3(4):337–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jarvinen MJ, Lehto MU. The effects of early mobilisation and immobilisation on the healing process following muscle injuries. Sports Med. 1993;15(2):78–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kujala UM, Orava S, Järvinen M. Hamstring injuries: current trends in treatment and prevention. Sports Med. 1997;23(6):397–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jarvinen TA, Jarvinen TL, Kaariainen M, et al. Muscle injuries: optimising recovery. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21(2):317–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Drezner JA. Practical management: hamstring muscle injuries. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(1):48–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tol JL, Hamilton B, Eirale C, et al. At return to play following hamstring injury the majority of professional football players have residual isokinetic deficits. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(18):1364–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mendiguchia J, Brughelli M. A return-to-sport algorithm for acute hamstring injuries. Phys Ther Sport. 2011;12(1):2–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmitt B, Tim T, McHugh M. Hamstring injury rehabilitation and prevention of reinjury using lengthened state eccentric training: a new concept. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(3):333–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. DeWitt J, Vidale T. Recurrent hamstring injury: consideration following operative and non-operative management. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(6):798–812.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sherry MA, Johnston TS, Heiderscheit BC. Rehabilitation of acute hamstring strain injuries. Clin Sport Med. 2015;34(2):263–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Valle X, Tol JL, Hamilton B, et al. Hamstring muscle injuries, a rehabilitation protocol purpose. Asian J Sports Med. 2015;6(4):e25411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Heiderscheit BC, Sherry MA, Silder A, et al. Hamstring strain injuries: recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, and injury prevention. J Orthop Sport Phys. 2010;40(2):67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Garrett WE Jr, Safran MR, Seaber AV, et al. Biomechanical comparison of stimulated and nonstimulated skeletal muscle pulled to failure. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15(5):448–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jarvinen MJ, Einola SA, Virtanen EO. Effect of the position of immobilization upon the tensile properties of the rat gastrocnemius muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1992;73(3):253–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Askling CM, Nilsson J, Thorstensson A. A new hamstring test to complement the common clinical examination before return to sport after injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(12):1798–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ardern CL, Glasgow P, Schneiders A, et al. 2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(14):853–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Orchard J, Best TM, Verrall GM. Return to play following muscle strains. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15(6):436–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fournier-Farley C, Lamontagne M, Gendron P, et al. Determinants of return to play after the nonoperative management of hamstring injuries in athletes: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(8):2166–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Delvaux F, Rochcongar P, Bruyere O, et al. Return-to-play criteria after hamstring injury: actual medicine practice in professional soccer teams. J Sport Sci Med. 2014;13(3):721–3.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Clanton TO, Coupe KJ. Hamstring strains in athletes: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Sur. 1998;6(4):237–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. van der Horst N, van de Hoef S, Reurink G, et al. Return to play after hamstring injuries: a qualitative systematic review of definitions and criteria. Sports Med. 2016;46(6):899–912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1998;52(6):377–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. De Vos RJ, Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, et al. Clinical findings just after return to play predict hamstring re-injury, but baseline MRI findings do not. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(18):1377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Moen MH, et al. Rationale, secondary outcome scores and 1-year follow-up of a randomised trial of platelet-rich plasma injections in acute hamstring muscle injury: the Dutch Hamstring Injection Therapy study. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(18):1206–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kilcoyne KG, Dickens JF, Keblish D, et al. Outcome of grade I and II hamstring injuries in intercollegiate athletes: a novel rehabilitation protocol. Sports Health. 2011;3(6):528–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hamilton B, Tol JL, Almusa E, et al. Platelet-rich plasma does not enhance return to play in hamstring injuries: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(14):943–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Askling CM, Tengvar M, Thorstensson A. Acute hamstring injuries in Swedish elite football: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing two rehabilitation protocols. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(15):953–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Askling CM, Tengvar M, Tarassova O, et al. Acute hamstring injuries in Swedish elite sprinters and jumpers: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing two rehabilitation protocols. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(7):532–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PC, et al. Assessment of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings of hamstring injury as predictors for recurrent injury. J Orthop Sport Phys. 2006;36(4):215–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Malliaropoulos N, Papacostas E, Kiritsi O, et al. Posterior thigh muscle injuries in elite track and field athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(9):1813–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sherry MA, Best TM. A comparison of 2 rehabilitation programs in the treatment of acute hamstring strains. J Orthop Sport Phys. 2004;34(3):116–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Silder A, Sherry MA, Sanfilippo J, et al. Clinical and morphological changes following 2 rehabilitation programs for acute hamstring strain injuries: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sport Phys. 2013;43(5):284–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Askling C, Karlsson J, Thorstensson A. Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(4):244–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. van der Horst N, Smits D-W, Petersen J, et al. The preventive effect of the Nordic hamstring exercise on hamstring injuries in amateur soccer players: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(6):1316–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Petersen J, Thorborg K, Nielsen MB, et al. Preventive effect of eccentric training on acute hamstring injuries in men’s soccer: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2296–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Arnason A, Andersen TE, Holme I, et al. Prevention of hamstring strains in elite soccer: an intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(1):40–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Opar DA, Williams MD, Timmins RG, et al. Eccentric hamstring strength and hamstring injury risk in Australian footballers. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2015;47(4):857–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Croisier JL, Ganteaume S, Binet J, et al. Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Timmins RG, Bourne MN, Shield AJ, et al. Short biceps femoris fascicles and eccentric knee flexor weakness increase the risk of hamstring injury in elite football (soccer): a prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;15(24):1524–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Timmins RG, Ruddy JD, Presland J, et al. Architectural changes of the biceps femoris long head after concentric or eccentric training. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2016;48(3):499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hegedus EJ, Cook CE. Return to play and physical performance tests: evidence-based, rough guess or charade? Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(20):1288–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Askling C, Saartok T, Thorstensson A. Type of acute hamstring strain affects flexibility, strength, and time to return to pre-injury level. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(1):40–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Jacobsen P, Witvrouw E, Muxart P, et al. A combination of initial and follow-up physiotherapist examination predicts physician-determined time to return to play after hamstring injury, with no added value of MRI. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(7):431–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bohannon RW. Manual muscle testing: does it meet the standards of an adequate screening test? Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(6):662–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wadsworth CT, Krishnan R, Sear M, et al. Intrarater reliability of manual muscle testing and hand-held dynametric muscle testing. Phys Ther. 1987;67(9):1342–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. van Dyk N, Bahr R, Whiteley R, et al. Hamstring and quadriceps isokinetic strength deficits are weak risk factors for hamstring strain injuries: a 4-year cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1789–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Brukner P, Connell D. ‘Serious thigh muscle strains’: beware the intramuscular tendon which plays an important role in difficult hamstring and quadriceps muscle strains. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(4):205–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pollock N, Patel A, Chakraverty J, et al. Time to return to full training is delayed and recurrence rate is higher in intratendinous (‘c’) acute hamstring injury in elite track and field athletes: clinical application of the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Pas HI, Reurink G, Tol JL, et al. Efficacy of rehabilitation (lengthening) exercises, platelet-rich plasma injections, and other conservative interventions in acute hamstring injuries: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(18):1197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Verrall GM, Brukner PD, Seward HG. 6. Doctor on the sidelines. Med J Aust. 2006;184(5):244–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Khan KM, Scott A. Mechanotherapy: how physical therapists’ prescription of exercise promotes tissue repair. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(4):247–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Nicol van Dyk and Dr. Peter Hickey for reviewing this manuscript prior to submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, 115 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia

    Jack T. Hickey, Ryan G. Timmins, Nirav Maniar & David A. Opar

  2. School of Health, Sport and Professional Practice, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, Wales, UK

    Morgan D. Williams

Authors
  1. Jack T. Hickey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan G. Timmins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nirav Maniar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Morgan D. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David A. Opar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack T. Hickey.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were required in the preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

Jack Hickey, Ryan Timmins, Nirav Maniar, Morgan Williams and David Opar declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hickey, J.T., Timmins, R.G., Maniar, N. et al. Criteria for Progressing Rehabilitation and Determining Return-to-Play Clearance Following Hamstring Strain Injury: A Systematic Review. Sports Med 47, 1375–1387 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0667-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0667-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation