References
Cookson R. Justice and the NICE approach. J Med Ethics. 2015;41(1):99–102.
Harris J. QALYfying the value of life. J Med Ethics. 1987;13(3):117–23.
Rawles J, Rawles K. The QALY argument: a physician’s and a philosopher’s view. J Med Ethics. 1990;16(2):93–4.
Daniels N, Sabin JE. An ethical perspective. BMJ. 2008;337:a1850.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE International Review 2014, London; 2014. http://www.nice.org.uk/media/default/About/what-we-do/NICE-International/NICE-International-Review-2014.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Cagney H. UK cancer drugs fund to reassess 42 agents. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):e8.
Baker H. Cancer drugs fund fails to collect patient outcomes. Lancet Oncol. 2015;6(15):e529.
National Audit Office. Investigation into the cancer drugs fund. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/investigation-into-the-cancer-drugs-fund/. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB [2015] UKSC 11.
R (Burke) v General Medical Council [2005] EWCA Civ.1003, [50].
Calabresi G, Bobbitt P. Tragic choices. New York: WW Norton & Company; 1978. p. 198.
Acknowledgments
Peter Hall (clinician) and Kenneth Boyd (ethicist) each wrote draft outlines and specialist paragraphs from which Kenneth Boyd prepared a first draft: this was then edited by both authors and an agreed final draft submitted: both authors also approved the first and second revisions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This is an invited editorial. Neither Kenneth Boyd nor Peter Hall received any funding for this paper, which was written in their own time.
Conflicts of interest
Kenneth Boyd and Peter Hall have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyd, K., Hall, P. Can Clinical Guidelines Afford to Ignore Cost Effectiveness? An Ethical Perspective. PharmacoEconomics 34, 529–531 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0391-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0391-2