Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Application of an Active Pharmacovigilance Framework Based on Electronic Healthcare Records from Multiple Centers in Korea

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

With the availability of retrospective pharmacovigilance data, the common data model (CDM) has been identified as an efficient approach towards anonymized multicenter analysis; however, the establishment of a suitable model for individual medical systems and applications supporting their analysis is a challenge.

Objective

The aim of this study was to construct a specialized Korean CDM (K-CDM) for pharmacovigilance systems based on a clinical scenario to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Methods

De-identified patient records (n = 5,402,129) from 13 institutions were converted to the K-CDM. From 2005 to 2017, 37,698,535 visits, 39,910,849 conditions, 259,594,727 drug exposures, and 30,176,929 procedures were recorded. The K-CDM, which comprises three layers, is compatible with existing models and is potentially adaptable to extended clinical research. Local codes for electronic medical records (EMRs), including diagnosis, drug prescriptions, and procedures, were mapped using standard vocabulary. Distributed queries based on clinical scenarios were developed and applied to K-CDM through decentralized or distributed networks.

Results

Meta-analysis of drug relative risk ratios from ten institutions revealed that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increased the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage by twofold compared with aspirin, and non-vitamin K anticoagulants decreased cerebrovascular bleeding risk by 0.18-fold compared with warfarin.

Conclusion

These results are similar to those from previous studies and are conducive for new research, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of K-CDM for pharmacovigilance. However, the low quality of original EMR data, incomplete mapping, and heterogeneity between institutions reduced the validity of the analysis, thus necessitating continuous calibration among researchers, clinicians, and the government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Drug and Therapeutics Committee Training Course. Submitted to the US Agency for International Development by the Rational Pharmaceutical Management Plus Program. Arlington: Management Sciences for Health; 2007.

  2. Aronson JK, Ferner RE. Clarification of terminology in drug safety. Drug Saf. 2005;28(10):851–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Suh DC, Woodall BS, Shin SK, Hermes-De Santis ER. Clinical and economic impact of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:1373–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies EC, Green CF, Taylor S, Williamson PR, Mottram DR, Pirmohamed M. Adverse drug reactions in hospital in-patients: a prospective analysis of 3695 patient-episodes. PLoS ONE. 2009;4: e4439.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fattinger K, Roos M, Vergeres P, Holenstein C, Kind B, Masche U, et al. Epidemiology of drug exposure and adverse drug reactions in two swiss departments of internal medicine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;49:158–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel TK, Patel PB. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in Indian hospitals: a systematic review of prospective studies. Curr Drug Saf. 2016;11:128–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miguel A, Azevedo LF, Araujo M, Pereira AC. Frequency of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21:1139–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rawlins MD. Pharmacovigilance: paradise lost, regained or postponed? The William Withering Lecture 1994. J R Coll Phys Lond. 1995;29:41–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shin YS, Lee YW, Choi YH, Park B, Jee YK, Choi SK, et al. Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug events by Korean regional pharmacovigilance centers. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:910–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim H, Choi J, Jang I, Quach J, Ohno-Machado L. Feasibility of representing data from published nursing research using the OMOP common data model. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2016:715–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou X, Murugesan S, Bhullar H, Liu Q, Cai B, Wentworth C, et al. An evaluation of the THIN database in the OMOP common data model for active drug safety surveillance. Drug Saf. 2013;36:119–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. FitzHenry F, Resnic FS, Robbins SL, Denton J, Nookala L, Meeker D, et al. Creating a common data model for comparative effectiveness with the observational medical outcomes partnership. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6:536–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rijnbeek PR. Converting to a common data model: what is lost in translation?: Commentary on “fidelity assessment of a clinical practice research datalink conversion to the OMOP common data model.” Drug Saf. 2014;37:893–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyce RD, Ryan PB, Noren GN, Schuemie MJ, Reich C, Duke J, et al. Bridging islands of information to establish an integrated knowledge base of drugs and health outcomes of interest. Drug Saf. 2014;37:557–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Weeks J, Pardee R. Learning to share health care data: a brief timeline of influential common data models and distributed health data networks in U.S. health care research. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019;7:4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Overhage JM, Ryan PB, Reich CG, Hartzema AG, Stang PE. Validation of a common data model for active safety surveillance research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:54–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross TR, Ng D, Brown JS, Pardee R, Hornbrook MC, Hart G, et al. The HMO Research Network Virtual Data Warehouse: a public data model to support collaboration. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014;2:1049.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Maro JC, Platt R, Holmes JH, Strom BL, Hennessy S, Lazarus R, et al. Design of a national distributed health data network. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:341–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI). http://omop.org/ . Accessed 1 Jun 2020.

  21. Sentinel Structure. http://www.mini-sentinel.org/. Accessed 1 Jun 2020.

  22. US FDA. The sentinel initiative: National strategy for monitoring medical product safety. 2008; US FDA. http://www.fda.gov/. Accessed 1 Jun 2020.

  23. Lee S, Han J, Park RW, Kim GJ, Rim JH, Cho J, et al. Development of a controlled vocabulary-based adverse drug reaction signal dictionary for multicenter electronic health record-based pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2019;42:657–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu H, Stenner SP, Doan S, Johnson KB, Waitman LR, Denny JC. MedEx: a medication information extraction system for clinical narratives. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:19–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Servi D, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995;274:29–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar S, Arnold M, James G, Padman R. Developing a common data model approach for DISCOVER CKD: A retrospective, global cohort of real-world patients with chronic kidney disease. PLoS One. 2022;17(9)

  28. Oscanoa TJ, Lizaraso F, Carvajal A. Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73:759–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiffen P GM, Edwards J, Moore A. Adverse drug reactions in hospital patients: a systematic review of the prospective and retrospective studies: Bandolier; 2002:1–14.

  30. Blower AL, Brooks A, Fenn GC, Hill A, Pearce MY, Morant S, et al. Emergency admissions for upper gastrointestinal disease and their relation to NSAID use. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11:283–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Bonggi Kim, PhD (Office of Pharmacoepidemiology and Bigdata Analytics, Department of Drug Safety Information, Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management) for his contribution to the operation and management of the MOA Network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dong Yoon Kang or Ju Han Kim.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was supported by a research grant provided as part of the 2018 MFDS project titled ‘Evaluation and Reduction Study of NSAIDS Side Effects in Patients with Chronic Pain and Arthritis’ (18172 Drug Safety 149-1) and a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI19C1310).

Conflicts of interest

Seon Choe, Suhyun Lee, Chan Hee Park, Jeong Hoon Lee, Hyo Jung Kim, Sun-ju Byeon, Jeong-Hee Choi, Hyeon-Jong Yang, Da Woon Sim, Bum-Joo Cho, Hoseok koo, Min-Gyu Kang, Ji Bong Jeong, In Young Choi, Sae-Hoon Kim, Woo Jin Kim, Jae-Woo Jung, Sang-Hoon Lhee, Young-Jin Ko, Hye-Kyung Park, Dong Yoon Kang, and Ju Han Kim declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University (H-1707-135-871).

Consent to participate and consent for publication

Consent from participants was not required as this study extracted anonymous data from an electronic health database under Korean regulations and approval from the Seoul National University.

Availability of data and material

All data analyzed in this study are included in this published article.

Code availability (software application or custom code)

The code generated during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author contributions

JHK designed and supervised the study, and SHL designed the K-CDM architecture and managed the mapping. DYK developed and validated the clinical scenario, and HJK constructed the query applicable to each institution. CHP and JHL proceeded with the K-CDM ETL, and SC analyzed the query results and prepared the manuscript. The remaining authors, who oversee each participating organization, extracted the EMRs for conversion to the CDM and performed queries to obtain the results. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (PDF 397 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choe, S., Lee, S., Park, C.H. et al. Development and Application of an Active Pharmacovigilance Framework Based on Electronic Healthcare Records from Multiple Centers in Korea. Drug Saf 46, 647–660 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-023-01296-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-023-01296-2

Navigation