Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Values in Modelling: Video Series Development and Evaluation Survey

  • Research Letter
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Winsberg E. Computer Simulations in Science. In: Zalta N (ed). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simulations-science/. Accessed 27 June 2023.

  2. Staniszewska S, Hill EM, Grant R, Grove P, Porter J, Shiri T, et al. Developing a framework for public involvement in mathematical and economic modelling: bringing new dynamism to vaccination policy recommendations. Patient. 2021;14(4):435–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Xie RZ, Malik ED, Linthicum MT, Bright JL. Putting Stakeholder Engagement at the Center of Health Economic Modeling for Health Technology Assessment in the United States. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021;39(6):631–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunka M, Ghanbarian S, Riches L, Landry G, Edwards L, Hoens AM, et al. Collaborating with patient partners to model clinical care pathways in major depressive disorder: the benefits of mixing Evidence and Lived Experience. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022;40(10):971–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Intemann K. Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling. Eur Jnl Philos Sci. 2015;5:217–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker WS, Winsberg E. Values and evidence: how models make a difference. Eur J Philos Sci. 2018;8:125–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harvard S, Winsberg E, Symons J, Adibi A. Value judgments in a COVID-19 vaccination model: a case study in the need for public involvement in health-oriented modelling. Soc Sci Med. 2021;286: 114323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Harvard S, Werker GR, Silva DS. Social, ethical, and other value judgments in health economics modelling. Soc Sci Med. 2020;253: 112975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Douglas H. Inserting the public into science. In: Maasen S, Weingart P, editors. Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Voorn GA, Vemer P, Hamerlijnck D, Ramos IC, Teunissen GJ, Al M, et al. The missing stakeholder group: why patients should be involved in health economic modelling. Appl Health Econ Health Pol. 2016;14(2):129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harvard S, Werker GR. Health economists on involving patients in modeling: potential benefits, harms, and variables of interest. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021;39(7):823–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Douglas H. Values in science. In: Humphreys P, editor. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of science. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016. p. 609–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199368815.001.0001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ted-Ed Lessons. https://www.youtube.com/@TEDEd. Accessed 27 June 2023.

  14. AsapScience. https://www.youtube.com/@AsapSCIENCE. Accessed 27 June 2023.

  15. CGP Grey. https://www.youtube.com/@CGPGrey. Accessed 27 June 2023.

  16. Denny MC, Vahidy F, Vu KY, et al. Video-based educational intervention associated with improved stroke literacy, self-efficacy, and patient satisfaction. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0171952.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cusimano MD, Chipman M, Donnelly P, et al. Effectiveness of an educational video on concussion knowledge in minor league hockey players: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi HJ, Johnson SD. The effect of context-based video instruction on learning and motivation in online courses. Am J Dist Educ. 2005;19:215–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stockwell BR, Stockwell MS, Cennamo M, et al. Blended learning improves science education. Cell. 2015;162:933–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sablic M, Mirosavljevic A, Skugor A. Video-based learning (VBL)—past, present and future: an overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technol Knowl Learn. 2021;26(4):1061–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09455-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harvard S, Winsberg E. The epistemic risk in representation. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2022;32:1–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brame CJ. Effective educational videos: principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16,03-0125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Harvard S, Winsberg E. Patient and public involvement in health economics modelling raises the need for normative guidance. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-023-01274-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge a patient partner (unnamed here), animators Sarah Heng Hartse and Lauren DeSilva, and philosopher of science Eric Winsberg for their contributions to the development of the video series described in this article. The authors also thank independent consultants Leah Grantham, Ali Tatum, and Taq Kaur Bhandal for their effort and insight in revising the video series. Stephanie Harvard gratefully acknowledges post-doctoral funding from Michael Smith Health Research BC and Mohsen Sadatsafavi for his mentorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Room 4103 Pharmaceutical Sciences Building, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada

    Stephanie Harvard & Amin Adibi

  2. Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul’s Hospital, 588-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada

    Adam Easterbrook & Greg Werker

  3. Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, 2053 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada

    Greg Werker

  4. New Westminster, Canada

    Alison McLean

  5. School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, K9671-8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada

    David Murphy

Authors
  1. Stephanie Harvard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adam Easterbrook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Greg Werker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alison McLean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amin Adibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Harvard.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Financial support for this project was received from Michael Smith Health Research BC. Stephanie Harvard receives post-doctoral funding from Michael Smith Health Research BC.

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Stephanie Harvard, Adam Easterbrook, Greg Werker, Alison McLean, Amin Adibi, and David Murphy have no conflicts of interest or competing interests to declare related to this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical approval was received for all research activities described herein (UBC Ethics Board H20-00207-A002).

Consent to Participate

Consent to participate was received from all participants (UBC Ethics Board H20-00207-A002).

Consent for Publication (from patients/participants)

Consent for publication was received from all participants (UBC Ethics Board H20-00207-A002), co-authors, and persons acknowledged by name in this manuscript.

Availability of Data and Material (data transparency)

Data will be made available on reasonable request and under the condition that ethical approval must be sought and received to release the data.

Code Availability (software application or custom code)

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

Stephanie Harvard: Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, writing – original draft. Adam Easterbrook: Methodology, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Gregory R. Werker: Methodology, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Amin Adibi: Data curation, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Alison McLean: Conceptualization, writing – review and editing. David Murphy: Conceptualization, writing – review and editing.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file2 (mp4 80,841 KB)

Supplementary file3 (mp4 57,526 KB)

Supplementary file4 (mp4 91,417 KB)

Supplementary file5 (mp4 87,152 KB)

Supplementary file6 (mp4 1,33,239 KB)

Supplementary file7 (mp4 87,280 KB)

Supplementary file8 (mp4 1,04,140 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harvard, S., Easterbrook, A., Werker, G. et al. Values in Modelling: Video Series Development and Evaluation Survey. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 21, 813–820 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-023-00820-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-023-00820-w

Search

Navigation