Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative study for hybrid UASB reactor performance using polyethylene media and luffa sponge as biofilm support

  • Research article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper study the performance of a lab-scale hybrid up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating low-strength synthetic wastewater using different biofilm supporting materials. Two identical reactors are constructed and operated at constant up-flow velocity of 0.1 m/hr., inflow rate of 9.76 L/d, and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 8.26 hours. The Start-up phase, using seed sludge for existing wastewater treatment plant, lasted until the efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal of both reactors reached 80%. Polyethylene (PE) media are added to one of the reactors and luffa sponge is used in the second reactor. Results show increased COD removal efficiency up to about 90% at 20 °C and biogas production rates from 3.8*10−3 till 7.5*10−3 m3 CH4/kg CODr using PE media. The COD removal efficiency reaches about 95% at 20 °C using luffa sponge and biogas production rates up to 6.5*10 −3 m3 CH4/kg CODr are achieved before clogging problem is observed. Effect of HRT reduction, from 8.26 to 4.13 hours, on removing clogging is investigated. Reduction in COD removal efficiencies is observed at low ambient temperatures during seasonal variations of 15–25 °C. AFM and SEM analysis are used to examine sludge granulation and biofilm formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruiz-Marín A, Campos-Garcia S, Zavala-Loría J, Solana F, Canedo-López Y. Assessment of luffa cylindrical as support in biofilms reactors for the biological treatment of domestic wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009;199:13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramakrishnan A, Surampalli RY. Effect of media packing density on the performance of anaerobic hybrid reactors for the treatment of complex phenolic wastewater. J Environ Eng. 2013;140:04013005–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Yang J, Tian Q, Liang X, Zhu Y, Sand W, Li F, Ma C, Liu Y, Yang B. Durability and performance of loofah sponge as carrier for wastewater treatment with high ammonium. Water Environ Res. 2019;91:581–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen Z, Zhou Y, Hu J, Wang J. Denitrification performance and microbial diversity in a packed-bed bioreactor using biodegradable polymer as carbon source and biofilm support. J Hazard Mater. 2013;250-251:431–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J, Chu L. Biological nitrate removal from water and wastewater by solid-phase denitrification process. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34(6):1103–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wahab MA, Habouzit F, Bernet N, Steyer J-P, Jedidi N, Escudié R. Sequential operation of a hybrid anaerobic reactor using a lignocellulosic biomass as biofilm support. Bioresour Technol. 2014;172:150–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anastopoulos I, Pashalidis I. Environmental applications of luffa cylindrical-based adsorbents. J Mol Liq. 2020;319:114127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ighalo JO, Adeniyi AG, Eletta OAA, Ojetimi NI, Ajala OJ. Evaluation of luffa cylindrical fibres in a biomass packed bed for the treatment of fish pond effluent before environmental release. Sustain Water Resour Manag. 2020;6(120):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:7928–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y, Zhang S, Pang C, Li J. Comparison of luffa cylindrical sponge and plastic sponge as carriers in sequencing batch biofilm reactor for sewage treatment. Adv Mater Res. 2012;518-523:2431–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chairprasert P, Suvajittanont W, Suraraksa B, Tanticharoen M, Bhumiratana S. Nylon fibers as supporting media in anaerobic hybrid reactors: it’s effects on system’s performance and microbial distribution. Water Res. 2003;37:4605–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Banu JR, Kaliappan S, Yeom IT. Treatment of domestic wastewater using upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Int J Environ Sci Tech. 2007;4(3):363–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang B, Chen Q, Bin L, Huang S, Zhang W, Fu F, Li P. Insight into the microbial community and its succession of a coupling anaerobic-aerobic biofilm on semi-suspended bio-cariers. Bioresour Technol. 2018;247:591–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dohdoh AM, Hendy I, Zelenakova M, Abdo A. Domestic wastewater treatment: a comparison between an integrated hybrid UASB-IFAS system and a conventional UASB-AS system. Sustainability. 2021;13:1853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elmitwalli TA, Sklyar V, Zeeman G, Lettinga G. Low temperature pre-treatment of domestic sewage in an anaerobic hybrid or an anaerobic filter reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2002;82:233–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rashed SA, Galal MM, Zaher K. Performance evaluation of IFAS system using honeycomb PVC media. Civil Environ Res. 2019;11(2):52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lettinga G, Roersma R, Grin P. Anaerobic treatment of raw domestic sewage at ambient temperatures using a granular bed UASB reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983;25(7):1701–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Lier JB, Mahmoud N, Zeeman G (2008) Anaerobic wastewater treatment. In: Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling and design, Chapter 16. Edited by M. Henze, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, G.A. Ekama and D. Brdjanovic. Published by IWA Publishing, London, UK., 401–442. ISBN: 978 1 84339 188 3.

  19. Mesticou Z, Kacem M, Dubujet P. Coupling effects of flow velocity and ionic strength on the clogging of a saturated porous medium. Transp Porous Med. 2016;112:265–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Seddik MM, Galal MM, Radwan AG, Abdel-Halim HS. Modified kinetic-hydraulic UASB reactor model for treatment of wastewater containing biodegradable organic substrates. Water Sci Technol. 2016;73(7):1560–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mckeown RM, Hughes D, Collins G, Mahony T, O’Flaherty V. Low temperature anaerobic digestion for wastewater treatment. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23:444–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Loganath R, Mazumder D. Performance study on organic carbon, total nitrogen, suspended solids removal and biogas production in hybrid UASB reactor treating real slaughterhouse wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng. 2018;6:3474–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2018.05.031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Seddik MM, Galal MM, Radwan AG, Abdel-Halim HS. Fractional-order model (FOM) for high strength substrate biodegradation in conventional UASB reactor. Biochem Eng J. 2018;133:39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Seddik MM, Galal MM, Rozaik EH, Radwan AG. Modified fractional-order model for biomass degradation in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor at Zenein wastewater treatment plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18797-9.

  25. Ninaji PC, Okolo BI, Onukwuli OD. Luffa cylindrica seed: biomass for wastewater treatment, sludge generation study at optimum conditions. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q. 2020;26(4):349–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance provided for investigation of wastewater and sludge samples by both Water Researches Center and microbiology laboratory at Faculty of Science, Cairo University. The authors also thank Dr. Sameh El-Tayer for his cooperation in biofilm examination at Nano-microscopic Center of Cairo University in El-Sheikh Zayed City, Giza, Egypt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Public Works Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Cairo, 12613, Egypt

    Hesham K. Abdel-Fattah, Mona M. Galal & Nagwan G. Mostafa

  2. Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Civil Engineering Department, Institute of Aviation Engineering and Technology, Giza, 12815, Egypt

    Mostafa M. El-Seddik

Authors
  1. Hesham K. Abdel-Fattah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mostafa M. El-Seddik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mona M. Galal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nagwan G. Mostafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa M. El-Seddik.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full). No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions. No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own. The manuscript does not report studies involving human participants, human data, or human tissue.

Consent for publication

All authors allow the publication of the paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-Fattah, H.K., El-Seddik, M.M., Galal, M.M. et al. A comparative study for hybrid UASB reactor performance using polyethylene media and luffa sponge as biofilm support. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 20, 749–756 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-022-00814-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-022-00814-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation