Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Critical assessment of the metabolic syndrome definitions in the adult general population of the United States - the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

  • Research article
  • Published:
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) consists of a cluster of cardiometabolic risk factors and is an important determining factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). We intended to use latent class analysis to classify the study population into several clusters.

Methods

The baseline information of 6,814 participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) aged 45–84 years in 2000–2002 was used. The latent class analysis was conducted to extract different patterns of components. SAS 9.2 and Stata 12 software were used for analysis.

Results

The components of MetS tend to accumulate, hence it would be feasible to categorize the population into three classes: [1] Non-Metabolic Syndrome Latent Class (NonMetS-LC), [2] Low Risk Latent Class (LowR-LC), and [3] Metabolic Syndrome Latent Class (MetS-LC). In women, adding high-density lipoprotein (HDL) component to the two-component combinations of NonMetS-LC will transfer the individual to MetS-LC, and it was found in 100% of combinations of MetS-LC. However, in men, blood pressure (BP) played such a similar role, which was found in 97.36% of combinations of MetS-LC.

Conclusion

Results showed that clinical value of each MetS component is different by gender. The main component in men was elevated BP; while low HDL and elevated fasting blood sugar (FBS) were in next ranks. However, the main component in women was low HDL; while elevated BP and FBS were in next ranks. Special attention should be paid to BP and HDL components, because these can be useful for clinicians and health policy-makers in diagnosis and screening. In conclusion, this study showed that revisions might be needed for the MetS definitions.

Graphical abstract

Highlights

  • We used latent class analysis to classify the study population to several clusters.

  • The main component for identifying metabolic syndrome in men was elevated BP.

  • In men, low HDL and elevated fasting blood sugar (FBS) were in next ranks.

  • The main component in women was low HDL; elevated BP and FBS were in next ranks.

  • This study showed a revision for metabolic syndrome definitions might be needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CVDs:

Cardiovascular Diseases

MetS:

Metabolic Syndrome

BP:

Blood Pressure

FBS:

Fasting Blood Sugar

HDL:

High-density Lipoprotein

TG:

Triglycerides

WC:

Waist Circumference

NonMetS-LC:

Non-Metabolic Syndrome Latent Class

LowR-LC:

Low Risk Latent Class

MetS-LC:

Metabolic Syndrome Latent Class

IDF:

International Diabetes Federation

NCEP-ATPIII:

National Cholesterol Education Program – Adult Treatment Panel III

References

  1. Qiao J, Lin X, Wu Y, Huang X, Pan X, Xu J, et al. Global burden of non-communicable diseases attributable to dietary risks in 1990–2019. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022;35(1):202–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saklayen MG. The global epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018;20(2):12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. [The prevalence. of metabolic syndrome in a 11 provinces cohort in China]. Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chin J Prev Med]. 2002;36(5):298–300.

  4. Cocoman AM, Gallagher D. A Retrospective Chart Review of Screening on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in an Irish Community Mental Health Service. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019;40(10):895–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2002;287(3):356–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Qin X, Qiu L, Tang G, Tsoi MF, Xu T, Zhang L, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among ethnic groups in China. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mokhayeri Y, Riahi SM, Rahimzadeh S, Pourhoseingholi MA, Hashemi-Nazari SS. Metabolic syndrome prevalence in the Iranian adult’s general population and its trend: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018;12(3):441–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Punthakee Z, Goldenberg R, Katz P. Definition, classification and diagnosis of diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42:10-S5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang PL. A comprehensive definition for metabolic syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2009;2(5–6):231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Daskalopoulou SS, Athyros VG, Kolovou GD, Anagnostopoulou KK, Mikhailidis DP. Definitions of metabolic syndrome: where are we now? Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2006;4(3):185–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang W, Reynolds K, Gu D, Chen J, He J. A comparison of two proposed definitions for metabolic syndrome in the chinese adult population. Am J Med Sci. 2007;334(3):184–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qiao Q. Comparison of different definitions of the metabolic syndrome in relation to cardiovascular mortality in european men and women. Diabetologia. 2006;49(12):2837–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nwankwo M, Okamkpa CJ, Danborno B. Comparison of diagnostic criteria and prevalence of metabolic syndrome using WHO, NCEP-ATP III, IDF and harmonized criteria: A case study from urban southeast Nigeria. Diabetes Metab Syndr: Clin Res Rev. 2022;16(12):102665.

  14. Mancia G, Bombelli M, Facchetti R, Casati A, Ronchi I, Quarti-Trevano F, et al. Impact of different definitions of the metabolic syndrome on the prevalence of organ damage, cardiometabolic risk and cardiovascular events. J Hypertens. 2010;28(5):999–1006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Riahi SM, Moamer S, Namdari M, Mokhayeri Y, Pourhoseingholi MA, Hashemi-Nazari SS. Patterns of clustering of the metabolic syndrome components and its association with coronary heart disease in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA): a latent class analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2018;271:13–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noor SWB, Ross MW, Lai D, Risser JM. Use of Latent Class Analysis Approach to describe drug and sexual HIV risk patterns among injection drug users in Houston, Texas. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(3):276–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bahar A, Kashi Z, Kheradmand M, Hedayatizadeh-Omran A, Moradinazar M, Ramezani F, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome using international diabetes federation, national cholesterol education panel- adult treatment panel III and iranian criteria: results of Tabari cohort study. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;19(1):205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nyenwe EA, Dagogo-Jack S. Metabolic syndrome, prediabetes and the science of primary prevention. Minerva Endocrinol. 2011;36(2):129–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weir E, Lipscombe L. Metabolic syndrome: Waist not want not. CMAJ. 2004;170(9):1390–1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mark AE, Janssen I. Relationship between screen time and metabolic syndrome in adolescents. J Public Health. 2008;30(2):153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. Latent class cluster analysis. Appl latent Cl Anal. 2002;11(89–106):60.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Katakami N, Kaneto H, Matsuhisa M, Umayahara Y, Kosugi K, Yamasaki Y. Clustering of several cardiovascular risk factors affects tissue characteristics of the carotid artery. Atherosclerosis. 2008;198(1):208–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed A, Khan TE, Yasmeen T, Awan S, Islam N. Metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes: comparison of WHO, modified ATPIII & IDF criteria. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62(6):569–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong G-C, Huang S-Q, Peng Y, Wan L, Wu Y-Q-L, Hu T-Y et al. HDL-C is associated with mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease and cancer in a J-shaped dose-response fashion: a pooled analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020:2047487320914756.

  25. Tangney CC, Mosca LJ, Otvos JD, Rosenson RS. Oral 17β-estradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy in postmenopausal women increases HDL particle size. Atherosclerosis. 2001;155(2):425–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eapen DJ, Kalra GL, Rifai L, Eapen CA, Merchant N, Khan BV. Raising HDL cholesterol in women. Int J Womens Health. 2010;1:181–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Slagter S, Waateringe R, Beek A, Klauw M, Vliet-Ostaptchouk J, Wolffenbuttel B. A critical evaluation of the metabolic syndrome definition: why we should be more cautious. Endocrine Abstracts. Bioscientifica. 2016;41. 

  29. Poznyak A, Grechko AV, Poggio P, Myasoedova VA, Alfieri V, Orekhov AN. The diabetes Mellitus-Atherosclerosis connection: the role of lipid and glucose metabolism and chronic inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Maric C. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women with diabetes. Gend Med. 2010;7(6):551–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Georgousopoulou EN, Kouli G, Kastorini C, et al. Exploration of the metabolic syndrome spectrum and its role in cardiovascular disease risk in Greece; the mediating effect of Mediterranean Diet: Results from the 10-year (2002–2012) follow-up of the ATTICA Study. Hell J Atheroscler. 2016;7(2):76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vaidya D, Szklo M, Ding J, Tracy R, Liu K, Saad M, et al. Agreement of two metabolic syndrome definitions and their association with subclinical atherosclerosis: multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis cross sectional study. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2007;5(4):343–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome–a new worldwide definition. Lancet (London England). 2005;366(9491):1059–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. SS. Hashemi-Nazari and Dr. SM. Riahi had full access to all data and take responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data and analyses. We thank researchers, staff, and participants of MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions is at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: Seyed Mohammad Riahi, Seyed Saeed Hashemi-Nazari.

Cleaning of data: Seyed Mohammad Riahi.

Data analysis and interpretation: Seyed Mohammad Riahi, Seyed Saeed Hashemi-Nazari.

Manuscript writing: Seyed Mohammad Riahi, Ali Fanoodi, Sameep Shetty.

Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Seyed Mohammad Riahi or Seyed Saeed Hashemi-Nazari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

For this study, ethical approval was not needed because the data were acquired under the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)—Research Materials Distribution Agreement (RMDA) V021d20120806.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. 

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest and are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The authors did not have any relationship with industry.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riahi, S.M., Fanoodi, A., Shetty, S. et al. Critical assessment of the metabolic syndrome definitions in the adult general population of the United States - the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). J Diabetes Metab Disord 22, 851–859 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-023-01213-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-023-01213-5

Keywords

Navigation