Abstract
Purpose
Although the bio-impedance phase angle is a relevant factor in nutritional assessment, studies with community-dwelling patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have not been identified. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between phase angle and nutritional status in community-dwelling patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus according to gender and accounting for related factors other than nutritional status.
Methods
This study included 122 patients (mean age 52.1 ± 13.5 years, 63 males and 59 females) with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in the community who used our Endocrinology and Metabolism medical clinic. The phase angle was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Albumin was an independent variable and the covariates were age, hemoglobin A1c, skeletal muscle index (SMI), and body mass index. Statistical analysis was performed using linear regression with a significance level of 5%.
Results
The linear regression model results showed a significant association between phase angle and albumin in both males and females (males: β = 0.26, females: β = 0.16). Age was also a relevant factor (male: β = −0.25, female: β = −0.51), and a significant association was found between phase angle and SMI in males (β = 0.54).
Conclusion
Phase angle was positively associated with albumin, a nutritional assessment index. These results suggest that phase angle can be a simple and noninvasive measure of nutritional status.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
IDF Diabetes Atlas. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF). 2021. https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/. Accessed 9 Jun 2022.
Cardiovascular disease and risk management. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022;45:S144–74.
Slattery A, Wegener L, James S, et al. Does the mini nutrition assessment-short form predict clinical outcomes at six months in older rehabilitation patients? Nutr Diet. 2015;72:63–8.
Nishioka S, Wakabayashi H, Yoshida T, et al. Obese Japanese patients with stroke have higher functional recovery in convalescent rehabilitation wards: a retrospective cohort study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:26–33.
Sánchez-Rodríguez D, Calleø A, Contraø A, et al. Sarcopenia in post-acute care and rehabilitation of older adults: a review. Eur Geriatr Med. 2016;7:224–31.
Marshall S, Young A, Bauer J, et al. Malnutrition in geriatric rehabilitation: prevalence, patient outcomes, and criterion validity of the scored patient-generated subjective global assessment and the mini nutritional assessment. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116:785–94.
Mehta A, De Paola L, Pana TA, et al. The relationship between nutritional status at the time of stroke on adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr Rev. 2022;80(12):2275–87.
Dent E, Visvanathan R, Piantadosi C, et al. Nutritional screening tools as predictors of mortality, functional decline, and move to higher level care in older people: a systematic review. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;31(2):97–145.
Praget-Bracamontes S, González-Arellanes R, Aguilar-Salinas CA, et al. Phase angle as a potential screening tool in adults with metabolic diseases in clinical practice: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1608.
Santin F, Rodrigues J, Brito FB, et al. Performance of subjective global assessment and malnutrition inflammation score for monitoring the nutritional status of older adults on hemodialysis. Clin Nutr. 2018;37:604–11.
Jiang N, Zhang J, Cheng S, et al. The role of standardized phase angle in the assessment of nutritional status and clinical outcomes in Cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature. Nutrients. 2022;15(1):50.
Jun MH, Kim S, Ku B, et al. Glucose-independent segmental phase angles from multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis to discriminate diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. 2018;8:648.
Mat S, Tan MP, Mohktar MS, et al. Phase angle and diabetes in community-dwelling older adults: cross-sectional analysis from the Malaysian elder’s longitudinal research (MELoR) study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76:680–4.
Jayanama K, Putadechakun S, Srisuwarn P, et al. Evaluation of body composition in hemodialysis Thai patients: comparison between two models of bioelectrical impedance analyzer and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Nutr Metab. 2018;2018:4537623.
De Borba EL, Ceolin J, Ziegelmann PK, et al. Phase angle of bioimpedance at 50 kHz is associated with cardiovascular diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76(10):1366–73.
Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. Asian working group for sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:300–7.
Ida S, Kaneko R, Imataka K, et al. Association between the history of falls and being homebound in elderly diabetic patients. Jpn J Geriatr. 2021;58:417–23.
Weng YC, Tsai SS, Lyu RK, et al. Diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy: correlation of clinical, laboratory, and Electrophysiologic studies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:6356459.
Haneda M, Utsunomiya K, Koya D, et al. Joint committee on diabetic nephropathy. A new classification of diabetic nephropathy 2014: a report from joint committee on diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Investig. 2015;6(2):242–6.
Dittmar M, Reber H, Kahaly GJ. Bioimpedance phase angle indicates catabolism in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2015;32:1177–85.
Stobäus N, Pirlich M, Valentini L, et al. Determinants of bio-electrical phase angle in disease. Br J Nutr. 2012;107:1217–20.
Koswoglu SZA, Dogrusoy M. Evaluation of phase angle measurements and nutrient consumption by bioelectrical impedance method of 20–65 years old women. Prog Nutr. 2020;22:2020012.
Barrea L, Muscogiuri G, Emidio P, et al. MacchiaMediterranean diet and phase angle in a sample of adult population: results of a pilot study. Nutrients. 2017;9:151.
Barbosa-Silva MC, Barros AJ, Wang J, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values for phase angle by age and sex. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:49–52.
Tomeleri CM, Cavalcante EF, Antunes M, et al. Phase angle is moderately associated with muscle quality and functional capacity, independent of age and body composition in older women. J Geriatr Phys The. 2019;42:281–6.
Noritake K, Kubo Y, Takahiro H, et al. Phase angle as a nutritional indicator in older inpatients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2022;37:87–93.
Uemura K, Yamada M, Saho K. Association of bio-impedance phase angle and physical activity level in alder adults. J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 2019;46:143–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: YM and TT; data collection: HK and KM; analysis, interpretation of the data, and writing the article: YM; critical revision of the article: YM, TT, HK, MH, KM, and HS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Hana-no-Oka Hospital (02020).
Consent
Consent for this study was obtained after subjects were fully informed in writing and orally about the purpose of the study, the contents of the examination, and the protection of their personal information.
Conflict of interest
All authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mori, Y., Tachi, T., Koizumi, H. et al. Association of bio-impedance phase angle and a nutritional indicator in community-dwelling patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-023-01196-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-023-01196-3