1 Introduction

Components and steel constructions, which are exposed to cyclic loads, are subject to the phenomenon of material fatigue which occurs in numerous fields of applications such as crane, aircraft, and platform construction [1]. Material fatigue is one of the elementary causes of damage in steel construction in addition to corrosion and wear and includes more than 33% of all known component damages [2]. This is caused by cracking and its growth and often ends in complete failure. Cracks tend to start at locations of increased stress concentration resulting from notches, cross-sectional changes, or material defects [3]. The resistance of a component to the entire fatigue process is often referred to as fatigue strength.

Since many designs require special component shapes, they are usually separated in the industry by thermal cutting processes such as laser beam cutting, oxy-fuel cutting, water jet cutting, or plasma cutting. Depending on the process parameters of the different cutting methods, the cut edges have a high or inferior quality, which influences the fatigue strength [4,5,6,7].

Design recommendations require that weld seams are placed in lowly stressed areas due to the crack-sensitive nature of the welded areas, and conventional post-treatment methods, like shot peening or high frequency mechanical impact (HFMI), are used [8]. As a result, unwelded areas of the components such as free cut plate edges gain technical and economic relevance as locations for potential fatigue cracks [4]. Due to increasing use of higher strength steels due to advantages such as lower production costs, reduction of CO2 emissions, and weight reduction, consideration of unwelded areas becomes even more important. By using higher-strength steels, the sheet thicknesses can be reduced, and consequently, the nominal stress level increases [9]. In particular, thermal cut edges must be considered and evaluated due to the geometrical and metallographical conditions. In addition to the heat-affected zone, unwanted boundary conditions can lead to undesired cuts in the component geometry during the cutting process. These process dysfunctions lead to incorrect components and to rejects. Besides the requirements for the quality characteristics of the components in EN 1090 [10] and further in ISO 9013 [11], legislation on product liability in some industries does not allow repair welds to be considered admissible, resulting in economically undesirable rejects.

The influence of thermal cutting edges and their different qualities on fatigue strength has already been examined in previous investigations, for example, by Sperle [4], Remes et al. [12], Stenberg et al. [9], Lillemäe et al. [13], and Peippo et al. [14]. Fatigue strength of weld-repaired cut edges has not been studied extensively so far. Jun et al. [15] carried out fracture and fatigue crack growth analyses on a weld-repaired railway rail. He found out that weld defects, such as porosity, lamella line cracks, and quick transitions in material hardness and microstructure, especially at the boundaries, could be the causes of the crack initiation. The crack growth was influenced by the magnitude of the residual stress at the surface. Akyel et al. [16] investigated the fatigue strength of repaired cracks in base material of high strength steels. The results show that most of the fatigue cracks initiated at the start-stop points of the weld cap. The statistical analysis revealed that the characteristic fatigue strength of the repaired specimens is close to the detail category 160 of EN 1993-1-9 [17]. He concluded that the repair weld has a limited negative influence on the fatigue strength of the material. Another study of Akyel et al. [18] examined the fatigue strength of repaired welded connections made of very high strength steels. He showed that the fatigue strength of the fatigue damaged connection can be completely recovered by the established repair procedure.

In this investigation, fatigue tests were carried out on oxy-fuel thermal cut edges with defect-free and faulty repair-welded samples to analyze the influence of competing notches on the fatigue strength. The stress ratio applied was R = 0.1 under constant amplitude load. All samples were characterized in terms of hardness, roughness, and perpendicularity according to EN 1090 and ISO 9013.

2 Experimental work

The effect of repaired notches on thermal cut edges on the fatigue strength of two different steel grades with a minimum yield strength of 355 and 690 MPa was analyzed. Mechanical properties of the steels were different. S355N are normalized rolled weldable fine grain structural steels with minimum yield strength of 355 MPa and a carbon equivalent value (CEV) less than 0.42, EN 10025-3 [19], and S690Q are quenched and tempered high strength steel with a minimum yield strength of 690 MPa and a carbon equivalent value less than 0.65, EN 10025-5 [20]. Samples were cut from a 20-mm-thick plate.

Table 1 shows the detailed material properties. The chemical composition including the carbon equivalent value is presented in Table 2. In addition, the cutting parameters are given in Table 3.

Table 1 Material properties
Table 2 Chemical composition (%)
Table 3 Cutting parameters

2.1 Specimens

The specimens used for fatigue tests were cut using thermal cutting processes. In this study, oxygen cutting was used. Steel plates had a thickness of 20 mm. The geometry of the specimens was similar to previous work [6]. The samples were 394 mm long, and in the center, the specimens had a parallel length of 20 mm with a width of 38 mm in the critical cross section (Fig. 1). To analyze competing notches on the fatigue strength of cut plate edges, two series, one of each material, were purposely cut with defects in order to reproduce process dysfunctions of the industry. The resulting notches by the flame penetration were subsequently welded using metal-active gas welding GMAW135 with filler wire G3Si1 in welding position flat 1G [21], cf. MAG135 (PA) [22]. Therefore, samples were rotated 90 ° around the y-axis (Fig. 2). The depth of the notch on the cut edge varies over the thickness of the specimen. At the top (entrance of the beam) the depth of the notch was about 5 mm, and at the bottom (beam exit), it was about 3 mm. Weld reinforcements were ground to a plane cut edge surface to recondition the specimen dimensions. Location of the notch is shown on the second specimen schematically at the bottom of Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Dimensions of fatigue test samples in millimeters, top: S690Q cutting speed high quality 4, bottom: S355N cutting speed low quality 2 + repaired notch

Fig. 2
figure 2

Locations of roughness and hardness measurements

2.2 Cut edge conditions

Geometrical and metallographic cut edge conditions were characterized. The location of roughness and hardness measurements are shown in Fig. 2. Hardness measurements were made at the cross section for the heat-affected zone (HAZ) as well as the base material (BM), see below. Further, cross-sectional A-A was defined to analyze the repaired notch in terms of hardness mapping and metallography analysis (Table 4). Notch was repaired using metal-active gas welding in 1G position (Fig. 3).

Table 4 Macroscopic surface analysis of the different series
Fig. 3
figure 3

Repaired specimen after grinding the weld reinforcements

2.2.1 Roughness measurements

To determine the surface condition, roughness measurements were made on the surface of each specimens in accordance with ISO 4288 [23]. Using the MarSurf M 400 surface measuring instrument, measurements were carried out with the profile method over a length of 17.5 mm. From each series, at least three specimens were measured. To include the roughness distribution over the specimen thickness, measurements were made at the top (entrance of the beam), in the middle, and at the bottom side (beam exit) of the cut edges. The maximum difference between the profile peak and the profile valley is averaged over five individual measuring sections; RZ is calculated of the five different RZ(i) as follows (Fig. 4) (Eq. 1) [17]:

Fig. 4
figure 4

Determination of the average surface roughness RZ

$$ {R}_Z=\frac{1}{5}{\sum}_{i=1}^5{R}_Z(i) $$
(1)

2.2.2 Perpendicularity measurements

Perpendicularity measurements were made on the specimens according to ISO 9013. Measurements were done on the cut edge surface. Tests were carried out with a triangulation laser to determine a height profile over the thickness. The perpendicularity is defined as the difference between lowest and highest value of the profile (Figure 5). On each specimen, five different locations were chosen to measure the perpendicularity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Perpendicularity

2.2.3 Hardness measurements and metallography analysis

Hardness measurements were carried out from cross sections which have been cut from the dog-bone specimens by using a water-cooled abrasive cutter. The surface were ground using different abrasive paper, polished, and etched with a Nital solution (2%) to visual the microstructure. The hardness in the HAZ of thermally cut edges was analyzed afterwards. Therefore, Vickers hardness (HV0.1) measurements were made for each series according to ISO 6507 [24]. Further, the hardness were measured on the cut edge surface of two series with the repaired notches (section A-A). Cut edges had to be prepared and ground to get a plane surface for the Vickers hardness (HV1) measurements.

2.3 Fatigue tests

Fatigue testing was conducted on servo-hydraulic test rigs at the Institute of Joining and Welding Technology at Technische Universität Braunschweig. The test load was applied force-controlled longitudinal to the cut edge with a constant amplitude load (CAL). The stress ratio applied was R = σminmax = 0.1. Tests were stopped at specimen fracture. Table 5 shows the fatigue test program. The fatigue strength was determined in the finite life region between 1 × 105 and 1 × 106. Run-outs (specimen without failure) were stopped at 5 million load cycles. The fatigue data was evaluated by linear regression without consideration of run-outs following the standard of DIN 50100 [25].

Table 5 Fatigue test data

3 Results

3.1 Roughness on the cut edge

The measured roughness parameter on the cut edge is the average of the five highest peaks and lowest valleys RZ at the top, in the middle, and at the bottom of the cut edge surface. The results are summarized in Table 6. Macroscopical analyses from the cut edge surface show differences of the RZ over the thickness (Table 4). Thus, the arithmetical peak-to-peak average roughness RZ was determined on the cut edge surface at three positions. The value ranges from 24.3 to 149 μm over all results. On all series, a gradient over the thickness is seen. Lowest values are located at the top of the cut edge (24.3–84.2 μm), mean values in the middle (72.4–129.5 μm), and the highest values at the bottom of the surface (95–149 μm).

Table 6 Data of roughness measurements on the cut edge surface

To classify the values in the quality groups regarding ISO 9013, highest values have to be considered. Comparing the various series, it is observed that there is no big difference between the different base metals. However, the velocity of the cutting process has an influence on the roughness values.

The bar graph in Fig. 6 compares the different roughness values RZ at the bottom of the cut edge surface, because highest values were determined. Further, the limits of the maximum RZ value for the specific plate thickness of 20 mm for the different quality groups are added. The roughness of the repaired section A-A was smoother than on the cut edge due to grinding of the weld reinforcements.

Fig. 6
figure 6

RZ values at the bottom of the cut edge surface

It is observed that all mean values of the series have to be classified in quality group 4. The base metal has no influence of the roughness values. Contrary to the base metal, the velocity affects the roughness. Decreasing the cutting speed decreases the roughness at the cut edge as well, and therefore, the quality increases. Even though a higher quality range in the ISO 9013 is not reached.

3.2 Perpendicularity measurements

Besides the roughness measurements, perpendicularity measurements were made to characterize the cut edge quality regarding ISO 9013. The bar graph shows the various u values defined as the difference between lowest and highest value of the profile including the error bars. Further, the limits of the maximum u value for the specific plate thickness of 20 mm for the different quality groups are added.

The perpendicularity show also the same tendency. Series 1 (S355, u = 0.65 μm) and 4 (S690, u = 0.36 μm) with a velocity of 420 mm/min have higher u values compared with series 2 (S355, u = 0.2 μm) and 5 (S690, u = 0.18 μm) with a velocity of 390 mm/min. With the high cutting speed, S355N is classified in quality group 4 and S690Q in quality group 3. Decreasing the cutting speed decreases the perpendicularity at the cut edge as well, and therefore, the quality increases. Both materials are ranged in quality group 2 with the low velocity (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Perpendicularity of the cut edges of the different series

3.3 Metallography analysis and hardness measurements

3.3.1 Measurements at the cut edge

The different cutting parameters affect the material close to the cut edge. The velocity of the cutting process and the following cooling rate have an influence on the size of the HAZ. Further, the base metal and the related CEV of it determine the possible maximum hardness. To check the maximum hardness at the cut edge and to point out possible differences over the thickness, three hardness profiles were determined. Hardness measurements were done on the cross section at the top (1 mm under the sample surface), in the middle, and at the bottom (1 mm over the sample bottom side).

Figure 8 shows hardness measurements for S355N and S690Q steel grades and the two different velocities used. Hardness profiles at the top marked as green cycles, in the middle as red squares, and at the bottom as blue triangles. Maximum permitted hardness values regarding EN 1090 are also added. All measurements were done at least 2 mm from both edges into the unaffected base material. Concerning the hardness measurements, the HAZ is 1–3 mm wide, depending on the base metal. In addition, the heat input at the top is higher which results in a wider HAZ. The maximum hardness value for S355N is 438 HV0.1 and for S690Q 461 HV0.1. It implicates a relatively increased hardening compared with the base material from 50 to 150%. The hardness values exceed slightly the maximum permitted hardness value from the EN 1090.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Hardness measurements on the cross section at the top, middle, and bottom of the cut edge. Variation of steel grade and velocity

3.3.2 Measurements at the repaired notch

To determine the heat-affected area and the hardness increase due to repair welding process, hardness mappings of the cross-sectional A-A (Fig. 2) were carried out with Vickers hardness (HV1) for both materials. Figure 9 shows the hardness mapping of the repaired notch from S355N (top) and S690Q (middle). Further, a hardness profile over the weld seam 1 mm under the surface is carried out of both materials. The different values of the base material of S355N—approx. 200 HV1—and S690Q—approx. 300 HV1—are visible. Also, the weld seam and the HAZ are well seen. At the top of both specimens, the weld seam is significantly wider than in the middle and at the bottom. The inserted notch by the oxy-fuel flame seems to be larger at the top. The maximum hardness values on the cross section are 436 HV1 for S355N and 449 HV1 for S690Q.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Hardness mapping of the repaired notch from S355N (top) and S690Q (middle). Vickers hardness profile 1 mm under the surface (bottom)

The hardness values do not exceed the maximum permitted hardness value from the EN 1090. Further, the values do not exceed the maximum hardness values from the cut edge measured (Figure 8).

The hardness profiles show similar curves of both measurements except the location and width of the HAZ and the values of the base material. The maximum hardness value is also similar about 410 HV1.

Due to repair welding with filler wire, pores and imperfections can occur in the weld seam. Metallography analysis on the weld seam has shown pores on 25% (6/24) of the samples. Imperfection has a radius up to 0.3 mm. Three out of the whole samples had failure at the repair weld induced by imperfections (Table 7).

Table 7 Fatigue test data

3.4 Fatigue test results

All fatigue test results are summarized in Table 6. It shows the number of specimens including run outs, the slope of the S-N curve, logC (intercept of the S-N curve with the y-axis), the nominal fatigue strength Δσ at 2 million load cycles (POS = 50%), the nominal fatigue strength Δσ at 2 million load cycles (POS = 97.7%), corrected to stress ratio R = 0.5, and the crack initiation location (cut edge surface/corner/plate surface). The corresponding survival probability of 97.7% is calculated by using Eq. 2:

$$ \log N=\left(\log C- kstdv\left(\log C\right)\right)-m\log \Delta \sigma $$
(2)
$$ with\ k=1.645\left(1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\right) $$
(3)

and the fatigue enhancement factor for the effective stress ratio is used from Hobbacher [26]:

$$ f(R)=1.16 $$
(4)

The fatigue test results of all series are shown in the following two figures (Figs. 10 and 11). Each figure presents one material with the different cutting speeds used and the series with the repaired notch. Two design curves from the IIW recommendations (FAT 125, FAT140) are also added—well known that the fatigue data evaluated cannot directly be compared with IIW FAT values.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Fatigue test data of oxy-fuel cut plate edges, S355N, 20 mm thick with varies velocities and repaired notch (Ke)

Fig. 11
figure 11

Fatigue test data of oxy-fuel cut plate edges, S690Q, 20 mm thick with varies velocities and repaired notch (Ke)

Fig. 10 shows the test data from oxy-fuel cut specimens made from S355N plates. Fatigue strength is sum up at the bottom left of the diagrams. Test data of S355N v1 as well as S690Q v1 was merged with data of previous studies with the same cutting parameters [6].

Fatigue strength at 2 million load cycles of S355N v1 was determined to ∆σ = 199 MPa with a survival possibility (POS) of 50%. The regression line was calculated to k = 4.4 without considering run outs. The benefit of a low cutting speed is primary at higher numbers of load cycles. The fatigue strength increase was determined to ∆σ = 249 MPa at 2 million load cycles with a slope of k = 6.0. It is an increase of 25% of fatigue strength compared with the fast velocity v1 = 420 mm/min. No significant decrease of the repaired notch series was observed. Fatigue strength results show similar values of ∆σ = 248 MPa and a slope of k = 6.8.

The test data of the material S690Q are shown in Fig. 11. Fatigue strength at 2 million load cycles of S690Q v1 was determined to ∆σ = 183 MPa (POS = 50%). The slope was calculated to k = 3.0. The fatigue strength of the series with the low velocity increased to ∆σ = 240 MPa at 2 million load cycles with a slope of k = 4.3. It is an increase of 31% of fatigue strength compared with the fast velocity v1 = 420 mm/min. No significant decrease of the repaired notch series was observed. Fatigue strength results show similar values of ∆σ = 238 MPa and a slope of k = 3.8.

4 Discussion

The geometrical details at the cut edges were determined according to the ISO 9013. Roughness and perpendicularity measurements were conducted on all different series. Quality differences were observed by using various velocities of the cutting process. RZ values are classified in quality group 4. Decreasing the cutting speed decreases the roughness at the cut edge, which comes up with a higher quality. Even though a higher quality range in the ISO 9013 is not reached. The perpendicularity show also the same tendency. Decreasing the velocity decreases the perpendicularity at the cut edge as well, and therefore, the quality increases. Both base metals (S355N and S690Q) are ranged in quality group 2 with the low velocity.

The hardness measurements at cut edge and at the repaired notch show that the maximum hardness values mainly comply with the EN 1090. Only three points at S690 v2 exceed the value of 2.5%. Higher hardness values can be explained by using a small penetration force HV0.1 and HV1 compared with the standard HV10. Several studies show that the use of HV10 in this area is not reasonable [27]. Hardness at the competing repaired notch show similar or lower values. Therefore, premature failure in case of the metallurgical notch in the repaired area is not expected.

The fatigue data evaluated here (Figs. 10 and 11) cannot directly be compared with IIW FAT values. The fatigue data has to be corrected for the stress ratio of R = 0.5 (IIW). Further, the data is analyzed based on 50% probability of survival. Test results should be analyzed to produce characteristic values. These are values that represent 95% survival probability (i.e., 5% failure probability) calculated from the mean on the basis of a two-sided confidence of 75% corresponding to a survival probability of 97.7% and adjust for a stress ratio of R = 0.5 [26].

Fig. 12 shows the fatigue strength results ∆σ (2E6) 97.7%, m = var., Rcor = 0.5. All series exceed FAT 125. The cutting speed affects the roughness and the perpendicularity on the cut edge. Due to reduced cutting speeds, the roughness and the perpendicularity decrease also. This results in an increase of the fatigue strength in all tested series in this study. The defect on the cut edges is reduced as critical details were the cracks might start. Series with the low velocity achieve FAT 160 in all cases equal to base material samples.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Fatigue strength ∆σ (2E6) 97.7%, m = var., Rcor = 0.5

The series with the repaired notch in the critical cross section by using metal-active gas welding in this study fulfil the standards of the IIW recommendations and do not show any significant reduction of the fatigue strength due to the determined pores or other metallurgical notches on the cut edge. However, fracture surface analysis show that for S355N specimens, three of the observed defects in the weld seam were determined as the critical defect for the crack initiation.

5 Summary

The document investigated experimentally the influence of competing notches on the fatigue strength of cut plate edges. Fatigue tests were conducted on oxy-fuel cut plate edges with constant amplitude loading at a stress ratio of R = 0.1. Two different materials S355N and S690Q with a plate thickness of 20 mm were considered. Further, different cut edge qualities were adjusted by changing the velocity of the cutting process. Two series were purposely cut with defects in order to reproduce process dysfunctions in the industry and subsequently repaired using metal-active gas welding.

Series with the repaired notch fulfil the standards of the IIW recommendations and do not show any reduction of the fatigue strength due to the determined pores in the weld seam.

In the case of fatigue strength, dysfunctions of the industry can subsequently repaired using metal-active gas welding. The weld reinforcements have to be ground to a plane cut edge surface. It is recommended to do a visual inspection of the repaired surface to determine possible huge pores.