Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical properties and microstructural study of homogeneous and heterogeneous laser welds in α, β, and α + β titanium alloys

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterogeneous welding has been investigated for three different couples of titanium alloys: α/α + β, α/β, and α + β/β. Plates of 100 × 60 mm and 1.6 or 1.8 mm thick were welded with a Yb:YAG laser. Tensile tests show that the resistance of the heterogeneous welded specimens was generally controlled by those of the weakest material except for the α + β/β where the ultimate tensile strength was approximately equal to the average value of both materials. In every case, the elongation of the welded sample was found to be smaller than that of the base metals. The rupture generally took place outside the weld metal and was found to be most of the time located in the alloy having the lowest mechanical properties. Nevertheless, a few large-size porosities detected by tomography in the α + β/β couple could explain why rupture for these samples occurred in the weld bead. For each couple, the porosities were situated at the board between the heat-affected zone and the molten zone. EBSD maps and EDX enabled the observation of different microstructures, which could be correlated to the heterogeneous composition and diffusion into the melted bath. When the stable microstructure of one of the couple alloys is the β phase, the molten zone of the bead consists of an alternative disposition of thin layers made of large equiaxed β grains and nano-martensite α′. That is explained by the weak diffusion of the alloying elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen YC, Nakata K (2009) Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties in friction stir welding of aluminum and titanium dissimilar alloys. Mater Des 30(3):469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dressler U, Biallas G, Mercado UA (2009) Friction stir welding of titanium alloy TiAl6V4 to aluminium alloy AA2024-T3. Mater Sci Eng A 526(1–2):113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahramana N, Gülença B, Findik F (2005) Joining of titanium/stainless steel by explosive welding and effect on interface. J Mater Process Technol 169(2):127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamachi Mudali U et al (2003) Corrosion and microstructural aspects of dissimilar joints of titanium and type 304L stainless steel. J Nucl Mater 321(1):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borrisutthekul R, Miyashita Y, Mutoh Y (2005) Dissimilar material laser welding between magnesium alloy AZ31B and aluminum alloy A5052-O. Sci Technol Adv Mater 6(2):199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao M et al (2012) Laser keyhole welding of dissimilar Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy to AZ31B magnesium alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 43(1):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang SQ, Liu JH, Chen DL (2013) Tensile and fatigue properties of electron beam welded dissimilar joints between Ti–6-Al–4V and BT9 titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 584:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferdinand C (2005) Mise en oeuvre et caracterisation d'assemblages soudés par procédés TIG et laser de tôles d'alliages de titane refractaire (in French), PhD thesis, INPT, France

  9. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson JO, Helander T, Höglund L, Shi PF, Sundman B (2002) Thermo-Calc and DICTRA, computational tools for materials science. Calphad 26(2):273–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiss L et al. (2016) Microstructure and property of titanium heterogeneous laser welding. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Titanium, TMS, p 317–321

  12. Huang JL et al (2012) On the mechanism of porosity formation during welding of titanium alloys. Acta Mater 60:3215–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pang S, Chen W, Wang W (2014) A quantitative model of keyhole instability induced porosity in laser welding of titanium alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 45A:2808–2818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohandas T, Banerjee D, Kutumba Rao VV (1999) Fusion zone microstructure and porosity in electron beam welds of an α + β titanium alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 30A:789–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jone DW, Pessall N, McQuillan AD (1961) Correlation between magnetic susceptibility and hydrogen solubility in alloys of early transition elements. Philos Mag 6(63):455–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scheil E (1942) Bemerkungen zur schichtkristallbildung. Z Met 34(3):70–72

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laheurte P (2003) Contribution à l'étude du comportement pseudo-élastique d'un alliage bêta métastable. Applications aux arcs orthodontiques (in French), Thesis, Université de Metz, France

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mélanie Duband (LICB) and Patrick Moll (LEM3) for their help during the experiments.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Laboratory of Excellence for Design of Alloy Metals for Low-mass Structures (‘DAMAS’ Labex).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Weiss.

Additional information

Recommended for publication by Commission III - Resistance Welding, Solid State Welding, and Allied Joining Process

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiss, L., Zollinger, J., Sallamand, P. et al. Mechanical properties and microstructural study of homogeneous and heterogeneous laser welds in α, β, and α + β titanium alloys. Weld World 63, 53–62 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-018-0627-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-018-0627-1

Keywords

Navigation