Abstract
The present study intended to investigate the generic nature of visual aesthetic experience. Researchers have not agreed upon what constitutes visual aesthetic experience, and the present study proposed that visual aesthetic experience is comprised of at least two components: enhanced visual processing and positive emotional and reward experience. We applied a general activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis to 42 functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments described in 37 published studies. The general activation likelihood estimation revealed activation in the left orbitofrontal cortices and bilateral anterior cingulate cortex, which was thought to be related to emotional and reward processes, and activation in the right fusiform gyrus. In addition, a conjunction analysis of passive viewing tasks and tasks with explicit instructions showed activation in the anterior cingulate cortex/orbitofrontal cortex, and contrast analysis revealed stronger activation in the anterior cingulate cortex/orbitofrontal cortex during the passive viewing task without explicit instructions to make aesthetic evaluations, suggesting that stronger emotional experiences occur under such conditions. A conjunction analysis of groups with different cultural backgrounds showed activation in the ventral anterior cingulate cortex/orbitofrontal cortex, suggesting that there are universal cultural components of visual aesthetic experience. Together, our findings complement the existing literature by including all kinds of visual stimuli that could induce an aesthetic experience in the viewer and contributes to our understanding of aesthetics by showing that it involves enhanced visual sensation and positive emotional and reward experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnati, L. F., Agnati, A., Mora, F., & Fuxe, K. (2007). Does the human brain have unique genetically determined networks coding logical and ethical principles and aesthetics? From Plato to novel mirror networks. Brain Research Reviews, 55(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.03.008
Bao, Y., Yang, T. X., Lin, X. X., Fang, Y., Wang, Y., Poppel, E., & Lei, Q. (2016). Aesthetic preferences for Eastern and Western traditional visual art: Identity matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01596
Boccia, M., Barbetti, S., Piccardi, L., Guariglia, C., Ferlazzo, F., Giannini, A. M., & Zaidel, D. W. (2016). Where does brain neural activation in aesthetic responses to visual art occur? Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 60, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.009
Boisgueheneuc, F. D., Levy, R., Volle, E., Seassau, M., Duffau, H., Kinkingnehun, S., & Dubois, B. (2006). Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: A lesion study. Brain, 129(12), 3315–3328.
Brielmann, A. A., & Pelli, D. G. (2018). Aesthetics. Current Biology, 28(16), R859–R863.
Brielmann, A. A., Vale, L., & Pelli, D. G. (2017). Beauty at a glance: The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration. Journal of Vision, 17(14), 9–9.
Broer, P. N., Buonocore, S., Morillas, A., Liu, J., Tanna, N., Walker, M., Ng, R., & Persing, J. A. (2012). Nasal aesthetics: A cross-cultural analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 130(6), 843E-850E. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826da0c1
Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, S. B., & Liotti, M. (2011). Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. NeuroImage, 58(1), 250–258.
Bullot, N. J., & Reber, R. (2013). The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation.
Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006). The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(2), 173–187.
Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 215–222.
Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Caspers, S., Kurth, F., Habel, U., Zilles, K., Laird, A., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2011). ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness. Brain Structure and Function, 215(3), 209–223.
Calvo-Merino, B., Jola, C., Glaser, D. E., & Haggard, P. (2008). Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 911–922.
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 172–194.
Che, J. J., Sun, X. L., Gallardo, V., & Nadal, M. (2018). Cross-cultural empirical aesthetics. In J. F. Christensen & A. Gomila (Eds.), Arts and the brain: Psychology and physiology beyond pleasure (Vol. 237, pp. 77–103). Elsevier Science Bv.
Chen, H. Y., Jablonski, N. G., Chick, G., & Yarnal, C. (2019). Caught between “light skin is beautiful and tanned skin is attractive”: How bicultural socialization shapes attitudes toward skin color aesthetics. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 10(4), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000154
Chen, H. Y., Robinson, J. K., & Jablonski, N. G. (2020). A Cross-cultural exploration on the psychological aspects of skin color aesthetics: Implications for sun-related behavior. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(1), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz063
Crossan, C., & Salmoni, A. (2019). A simulated walk in nature: Testing predictions from the attention restoration theory. Environment and Behavior, 0013916519882775.
Cupchik, G. C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A., & Mikulis, D. J. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003
Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). The golden beauty: Brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE, 2(11), 1201.
Eickhoff, S. B., Bzdok, D., Laird, A. R., Kurth, F., & Fox, P. T. (2012). Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2349–2361.
Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Grefkes, C., Wang, L. E., Zilles, K., & Fox, P. T. (2009). Coordinate-based ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Human Brain Mapping, 30(9).
Floden, D., & Stuss, D. T. (2006). Inhibitory control is slowed in patients with right superior medial frontal damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1843–1849.
Gazzaley, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 129–135.
Graf, L. K., & Landwehr, J. R. (2015). A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: The pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 395–410.
Grill-Spector, K., & Sayres, R. (2008). Object recognition: Insights from advances in fMRI methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 73–79.
Haber, S. N., & Knutson, B. (2010). The reward circuit: Linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 4–26.
Hampshire, A., Chamberlain, S. R., Monti, M. M., Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2010). The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: Inhibition and attentional control. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1313–1319.
Hofel, L., & Jacobsen, T. (2007). Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.02.007
Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS ONE, 6(7), 21852.
Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R. I., Hofel, L., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage, 29(1), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010
Katsuki, F., & Constantinidis, C. (2014). Bottom-up and top-down attention: Different processes and overlapping neural systems. The Neuroscientist, 20(5), 509–521.
Kesner, L. (2014). The predictive mind and the experience of visual art work. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01417
Knutson, B., Fong, G. W., Adams, C. M., Varner, J. L., & Hommer, D. (2001). Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fmri. NeuroReport, 12(17), 3683.
Lacey, S., Hagtvedt, H., Patrick, V. M., Anderson, A., Stilla, R., Deshpande, G., Hu, X., Sato, J. R., Reddy, S., & Sathian, K. (2011). Art for reward’s sake: Visual art recruits the ventral striatum. NeuroImage, 55(1), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.027
Makin, A. D. J., Pecchinenda, A., & Bertamini, M. (2012). Implicit affective evaluation of visual symmetry. Emotion, 12(5), 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026924
Marković, S. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. i-Perception, 3(1), 1–17.
Marsh, A. A., Blair, K. S., Vythilingam, M., Busis, S., & Blair, R. J. R. (2007). Response options and expectations of reward in decision-making: The differential roles of dorsal and rostral anterior cingulate cortex. NeuroImage, 35(2), 979–988.
McCrae, R. R. (2007). Aesthetic chills as a universal marker of openness to experience. Motivation and Emotion, 31(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9053-1
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2019). What are aesthetic emotions? Psychological Review, 126(2), 171.
Montague, P. R., Harvey, A. H., & Kirk, U. (2014). Using fMRI to study valuation and choice. In: InTech Open.
Nadal, M., Flexas, A., Galvez, A., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2012). Neuroaesthetics: Themes from the past, current issues, and challenges for the future. Rendiconti Lincei, 23(3), 247–258.
Nodine, C., Mello-Thoms, C., Krupinski, E., & Locher, P. (2008). Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spatial Vision, 21(1–2), 55–77.
Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), Annual Review of Psychology, (Vol. 64, pp. 77–107).
Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003
Pittard, N., Ewing, M., & Jevons, C. (2007). Aesthetic theory and logo design: Examining consumer response to proportion across cultures. International Marketing Review, 24(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330710761026
Ptito, M., Matteau, I., Zhi Wang, A., Paulson, O. B., Siebner, H. R., & Kupers, R. (2012). Crossmodal recruitment of the ventral visual stream in congenital blindness. Neural plasticity, 2012.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382.
Redies, C. (2015). Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3339/fnhurn.2015.00218
Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 611–647.
Rigney, A. E., Koski, J. E., & Beer, J. S. (2018). The functional role of ventral anterior cingulate cortex in social evaluation: Disentangling valence from subjectively rewarding opportunities. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(1), 14–21.
Rolke, B., Stepper, M. Y., Seibold, V. C., & Hein, E. (2019). Aesthetic stimuli attract visual spatial attention. Art & Perception, 7(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-20191101
Schacht, A., Werheid, K., & Sommer, W. (2008). The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.8.2.132
Sescousse, G., Caldú, X., Segura, B., & Dreher, J.-C. (2013). Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(4), 681–696.
Shimamura, A. P. (2013). Experiencing art: Explorations in aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Silvia, P. J. (2012). Human emotions and aesthetic experience. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brain and Experience, 250–275.
Skov, M., & Nadal, M. (2019). The nature of perception and emotion in aesthetic appreciation: A response to Makin’s challenge to empirical aesthetics.
Skov, M., & Nadal, M. (2020a). A farewell to art: Aesthetics as a topic in psychology and neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 630–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619897963
Skov, M., & Nadal, M. (2020b). There are no aesthetic emotions: Comment on Menninghaus et al. (2019).
Street, N., Forsythe, A. M., Reilly, R., Taylor, R., & Helmy, M. S. (2016). A complex story: Universal preference vs individual differences shaping aesthetic response to fractals patterns. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00213
Sumnall, H. R., Cole, J. C., & Jerome, L. (2006). The varieties of ecstatic experience: An exploration of the subjective experiences of ecstasy. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 20(5), 670–682.
Taylor, C., Clifford, A., & Franklin, A. (2013). Color preferences are not universal. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 142(4), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030273
Tsukiura, T., & Cabeza, R. (2011). Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments: implications for the Beauty-is-Good stereotype. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(1), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq025
Turkeltaub, P. E., Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Fox, M., & Fox, P. (2015). Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 33(1), 1–13.
van Dongen, N. N. N., & Zijlmans, J. (2017). The science of art: The universality of the law of contrast. American Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 283–294.
Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2004). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. NeuroReport, 15(5), 893–897.
Vartanian, O., & Skov, M. (2014). Neural correlates of viewing paintings: Evidence from a quantitative meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Brain and Cognition, 87, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.004
Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2012). The brain on art: intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00066
Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2013). Art reaches within: Aesthetic experience, the self and the default mode network. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00258
Watanabe, M., Cheng, K., Murayama, Y., Ueno, K., Asamizuya, T., Tanaka, K., & Logothetis, N. (2011). Attention but not awareness modulates the BOLD signal in the human V1 during binocular suppression. Science, 334(6057), 829–831. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203161
Yang, T. X., Silveira, S., Formuli, A., Paolini, M., Poppel, E., Sander, T., & Bao, Y. (2019). Aesthetic experiences across cultures: Neural correlates when viewing traditional eastern or western landscape paintings. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00798
Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nature Methods, 8(8), 665-U695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1635
Yeh, Y.-C., Lin, C.-W., Hsu, W.-C., Kuo, W.-J., & Chan, Y.-C. (2015). Associated and dissociated neural substrates of aesthetic judgment and aesthetic emotion during the appreciation of everyday designed products. Neuropsychologia, 73, 151–160.
Zeki, S., Romaya, J. P., Benincasa, D. M., & Atiyah, M. F. (2014). The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, X., Gan, J., Huang, X. et al. Neural representations of visual aesthetic experience (VAE): a meta-analysis. Cult. Brain 10, 1–26 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-021-00102-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-021-00102-z