Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spinal Stimulators: Review of the Current Evidence

  • Review
  • Published:
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has widely increased in terms of neuromodulation for patients with chronic pain. This article discusses the most recent evidence of various indications of SCS to manage pain and improve the quality of life in patients.

Recent Findings

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved SCS for specific etiologies of chronic pain. The ongoing effort has been dedicated to improving stimulation mechanisms and expanding indications of SCS with promising results. It is essential for providers to be aware of the most current technology and approved and potential indications of SCS to maximize outcomes for each individual patient.

Summary

SCS can manage chronic pain for patients and improve their function and quality of life. Specific FDA-approved indications are currently available for patients and can be used for managing debilitating pain. The development of non-FDA indications for SCS is ongoing and provides hope for patients with refractory pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Sdrulla AD, Guan Y, Raja SN. Spinal cord stimulation: clinical efficacy and potential mechanisms. Pain Pract. 2018;18(8):1048–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12692.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. • Deer TR, Falowski SM, Moore GA, et al. Passive recharge burst spinal cord stimulation provides sustainable improvements in pain and psychosocial function: 2-year results from the TRIUMPH study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(7):548–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004283. (This study is significant in that it demonstrated that the burst SCS can result in positive long-term outcomes for the management of chronic back pain including improving function, quality of life, pain intensity, and psychological distress.).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali R, Schwalb JM. History and future of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2023 https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002654

  4. Krames E. Spinal cord stimulation: indications, mechanism of action, and efficacy. Curr Rev Pain. 1999;3(6):419–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-999-0068-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nissen M, Ikaheimo TM, Huttunen J, Leinonen V, von Und Zu, Fraunberg M. Long-term outcome of spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome: 20 years of experience with 224 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(5):1011–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Masopust V, Holubova J, Skalicky P, et al. Neuromodulation in the treatment of postoperative epidural fibrosis: comparison of the extent of epidural fibrosis and the effect of stimulation. Physiol Res. 2021;70(3):461–8. https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.934617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. North RB, Calodney A, Bolash R, et al. Redefining spinal cord stimulation “trials”: a randomized controlled trial using single-stage wireless permanent implantable devices. Neuromodulation. 2020;23(1):96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Russo M, Cousins MJ, Brooker C, et al. Effective relief of pain and associated symptoms with cl osed-loop spinal cord stimulation system: preliminary results of the Avalon study. Neuromodulation. 2018;21(1):38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooker C, Russo M, Cousins MJ, et al. ECAP-controlled closed-loop spinal cord stimulation efficacy and opioid reduction over 24-months: final results of the prospective, multicenter, open-label Avalon study. Pain Pract. 2021;21(6):680–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Mekhail N, Levy RM, Deer TR, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic back and leg pain (Evoke): a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(2):123–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30414-4. (Findings from this study demonstrated that closed-loop stimulation provided more meaningful pain relief than open-loop spinal cord stimulation. This suggests management options in SCS should be considered for various patients.).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Ridder D, Plazier M, Kamerling N, Menovsky T, Vanneste S. Burst spinal cord stimulation for limb and back pain. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(5):642-649e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Graham DT, Lambert M, Mirzadeh Z, Ponce FA. Factors contributing to spinal cord stimulation outcomes for chronic pain. Neuromodulation. 2022;25(1):145–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagedorn JM, Falowski SM, Blomme B, Capobianco RA, Yue JJ. Burst spinal cord stimulation can attenuate pain and its affective components in chronic pain patients with high psychological distress: results from the prospective, international TRIUMPH study. Spine J. 2022;22(3):379–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Odonkor C, Kwak R, Ting K, Hao D, Collins B, Ahmed S. Fantastic four: age, spinal cord stimulator waveform, pain localization and history of spine surgery influence the odds of successful spinal cord stimulator trial. Pain Physician. 2020;23(1):E19–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders RA, Hoelzer BC, Bendel MA, et al. Utilization of leads after permanent implant in spinal cord stimulator systems. Pain Pract. 2018;18(5):562–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vallejo R, Chakravarthy K, Will A, Trutnau K, Dinsmoor D. A new direction for closed-loop spinal cord stimulation: combining contemporary therapy paradigms with evoked compound action potential sensing. J Pain Res. 2021;14:3909–18. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.S344568.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, et al. 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic axial low back pain in patients with no history of spinal surgery: a preliminary, prospective, open label and proof-of-concept study. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorenkamp BC, Popovich JM, O’Hagan K, Flood JN. P128 Spinal cord stimulation decreases pain and disability in patients with non-radicular, nonoperative chronic axial low back pain. Spine J. 2020;20(9):S207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, et al. Long-term improvements in chronic axial low back pain patients without previous spinal surgery: a cohort analysis of 10-khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation over 36 months. Pain Med. 2018;19(6):1219–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehta V, Poply K, Ahmad A, et al. Effectiveness of high dose spinal cord stimulation for non-surgical intractable lumbar radiculopathy - HIDENS Study. Pain Pract. 2022;22(2):233–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Campwala Z, Datta P, DiMarzio M, Sukul V, Feustel PJ, Pilitsis JG. Spinal cord stimulation to treat low back pain in patients with and without previous spine surgery. Neuromodulation. 2021;24(8):1363–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Awad AJ, Jex B, Kirchen G, Peterson S, Endrizzi SA, Pahapill PA. Spinal cord stimulation for neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Physician. 2021;24(8):E1247–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kemler MA, de Vet HC, Barendse GA, van den Wildenberg FA, van Kleef M. Effect of spinal cord stimulation for chronic complex regional pain syndrome Type I: five-year final follow-up of patients in a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(2):292–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/108/2/0292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghosh PE, Gill JS, Simopoulos T. The evolving role of high-frequency spinal cord stimulation as salvage therapy in neurostimulation. Pain Pract. 2020;20(7):706–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Canos-Verdecho A, Abejon D, Robledo R, et al. Randomized prospective study in patients with complex regional pain syndrome of the upper limb with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (10-kHz) and low-frequency spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2021;24(3):448–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. • Petersen EA, Stauss TG, Scowcroft JA, et al. Effect of high-frequency (10-kHz) spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(6):687–98. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0538. (The results of this study suggest that 10-kHz SCS can effectively manage refractory peripheral diabetic neuropathy. Specifically, SCS can improve pain intensity as well as quality of life.).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chakravarthy K, Kent AR, Raza A, Xing F, Kinfe TM. Burst spinal cord stimulation: review of preclinical studies and comments on clinical outcomes. Neuromodulation. 2018;21(5):431–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Langford B, Hunt C, Lerman A, Mauck WD. Pre-operative assessment of patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris. Pain Med. 2021;22(11):2763–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lanza GA, Grimaldi R, Greco S, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a multicenter randomized single-blind study (the SCS-ITA trial). Pain. 2011;152(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar K, Toth C, Nath RK, Verma AK, Burgess JJ. Improvement of limb circulation in peripheral vascular disease using epidural spinal cord stimulation: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(4):662–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.86.4.0662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Piedade GS, Vesper J, Reichstein D, Dauphin AK, Damirchi S. Spinal cord stimulation in non-reconstructable critical limb ischemia: a retrospective study of 71 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023;165(4):967–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05448-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Augustinsson LE. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation in peripheral vascular disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987;10(1 Pt 2):205–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb05948.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jivegard LE, Augustinsson LE, Holm J, Risberg B, Ortenwall P. Effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with inoperable severe lower limb ischaemia: a prospective randomised controlled study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995;9(4):421–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80010-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Klinkova A, Kamenskaya O, Ashurkov A, et al. The clinical outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia one year after spinal cord stimulation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:356–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.12.093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Romero-Serrano E, Esparza-Minana JM. Spinal cord stimulation in the approach to chronic pelvic pain: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(52):e28379. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028379.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sankarasubramanian V, Chiravuri S, Mirzakhalili E, et al. Quantitative sensory testing of spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion stimulation in chronic pain patients. Neuromodulation. 2021;24(4):672–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mekhail N, Costandi S, Saweris Y, Armanyous S, Chauhan G. Impact of biological sex on the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain. Pain Pract. 2022;22(4):432–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Texakalidis P, Tora MS, Nagarajan P, Keifer OP Jr, Boulis NM. High cervical spinal cord stimulation for occipital neuralgia: a case series and literature review. J Pain Res. 2019;12:2547–53. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S214314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Xia Y, Doth AH. Spinal cord stimulation infection rate and risk factors: results from a United States payer database. Neuromodulation. 2019;22(2):179–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Leplus A, Voirin J, Cuny E, et al. Is spinal cord stimulation still effective after one or more surgical revisions? Neuromodulation. 2023;26(5):1102–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2023.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Patel SK, Gozal YM, Saleh MS, Gibson JL, Karsy M, Mandybur GT. Spinal cord stimulation failure: evaluation of factors underlying hardware explantation. J Neurosurg Spine 2019:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.6.SPINE181099

  42. Rosenow JM, Stanton-Hicks M, Rezai AR, Henderson JM. Failure modes of spinal cord stimulation hardware. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(3):183–90. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.5.3.183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Antonovich DD, Gama W, Ritter A, et al. Reoperation rates of percutaneous and paddle leads in spinal cord stimulator systems: a single-center retrospective analysis. Pain Med. 2021;22(1):34–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zarrin DA, Wilson BR, Teton ZE, Sheldon BL, Dorsi MJ. The role of vancomycin powder during spinal cord stimulator implantation: a case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2021;156:e72–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pino IP, Nightingale TE, Hoover C, et al. The safety of epidural spinal cord stimulation to restore function after spinal cord injury: post-surgical complications and incidence of cardiovascular events. Spinal Cord. 2022;60(10):903–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00822-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10129, USA

    Esha Jain & Oranicha Jumreornvong

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai West, 200 W 57th. St. #1208, New York, NY, 10019, USA

    Jung H. Kim & Darryl Brown

  3. Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5P, New York, NY, 10003, USA

    Tariq AlFarra & Soo Y. Kim

Authors
  1. Esha Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oranicha Jumreornvong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tariq AlFarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jung H. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Darryl Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Soo Y. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EJ, TA, JK, and SK were responsible for conception and design. SK provided administrative support. All authors wrote the manuscript text. All authors reviewed and gave final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo Y. Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Esha Jain, Oranicha Jumreornvong, Tariq AlFarra, Jung H. Kim, Darryl Brown, and Soo Y. Kim declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, E., Jumreornvong, O., AlFarra, T. et al. Spinal Stimulators: Review of the Current Evidence. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 12, 210–216 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-024-00445-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-024-00445-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation