Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Safe and Rational Use of Analgesics: Non-Opioid Analgesics Alternatives to the Use of Narcotics in Emergency Pain Management

  • Pain Management in Adults (S Mace, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Clinicians in every setting have been charged with relief of pain as part of their mission as providers. Pain relief has been listed as one of the drivers of patient satisfaction and, in many settings, of reimbursement. Manyhealth care practitioners equate aggressive pain relief with administration of narcotic analgesia. Given the scourge ofnarcotic addiction, and evidence that many patients started on narcotic analgesics in the emergency setting will still betaking narcotics one year later, and may die from narcotic addiction or overdose, the possibility of providing pain reliefwithout the use of narcotics has attained some urgency.

Recent Findings

There is evidence that patients recognize the tension between providing opioid stewardship and pain management. This may be due to the barrage of news on an almost daily basis regarding the opioid epidemic and the number of deaths attributable to narcotic use, addiction and overdose.

Summary

The balance between relief of pain and suffering and concern for narcotic abuse and addiction is one which has not been resolved. Patient satisfaction surveys and on-line evaluations of physician care provide further confounding factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • Porter ME. What is value in health care? NEJM. 2010;363(26):2477–81. Emphasizes the importance of being attached to the overall patient experience both in surveys and in compensation/job stability.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reuben DB, Tinetti ME. Goal-oriented patient care—an alternative health outcomes paradigm. NEJM. 2012;366(9):777–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Manary MP, Bounding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. NEJM. 2013;368(3):201–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. • Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, Franks SP. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):405–11. Show that patient satisfaction does not necessarily correlate with quality as perceived by the medical community or with clinical guidelines, effectively calling into question the integrity of patient satisfaction surveys themselves.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. •• CMS and American Hospital Association. Hospital value-based purchasing: biggest bonuses and penalties. CMS percentage change in reimbursement based on process performance and patient satisfaction. Modern Healthcare. 2013;43(1):34. Discusses the specifics of reimbursement based upon patient satisfaction surveys.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wattana MK, Todd KH. Patient satisfaction surveys and the treatment of pain in the emergency department (ED) setting. Pain Med. 2013;14:968–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zusman EE. HCAHPS replaces press ganey survey as quality measure for patient hospital experience. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2):N21–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kenen J. The ACA and patient satisfaction: does it improve care? Association of Health Care Journalists, 2015.

  9. Schwartz TM, Tai M, Babu KM, Merchant RC. Lack of association between Press Ganey emergency department patient satisfaction scores and emergency department administration of analgesic medications. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(5):469–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Joint Commission Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. CAMH revised pain management standards. 2000 Available at http://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/standards.aspx.

  11. Zempsky WT, Cravero JP. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1348–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mace SE, Brown LA, Francis L, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the sedation of pediatric patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(4):378–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy RM, Luhmann J, Zempsky WT. Clinical implications of unmanaged needle-insertion pain and distress in children. Pediatrics. 2008;122:S130–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mace SE, Murphy MF. Pain management and sedation: definitions and clinical applications. In: Mace SE, Ducharme J, Murphy MF, editors. Pain management & procedural sedation, vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill Co. Inc; 2006. p. 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fosnocht DE, Swanson ER, Bossart P. Patient expectations for pain medication delivery. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19:399–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Todd KH, Ducharme J, Choiniere M, et al. Pain in the emergency department: results of the pain and emergency medicine initiative (PEMI) multicenter study. J Pain. 2007;8:460–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Fosnocht DE, Swanson ER, Barton ED. Changing attitudes about pain and pain control in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2005;23:297–306. Discusses specifics regarding patient expectations of pain relief in the emergency department.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meghani SH, Byun E, Gallagher RM. Time to take stock: a meta-analysis and systematic review of analgesic treatment disparities for pain in the United States. Pain Med. 2012;13:150–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reyes-Gibby CC, Todd KH. Oligo-evidence for oligo anesthesia: a non sequitor? Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(3):373–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Todd KH, Sloan EP, Chen C, et al. Survey of pain etiology, management practices and patient satisfaction in two urban emergency departments. CJEM. 2002;4:252–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta A, Ashburn M, Ballantyne J. Quality assurance and assessment in pain management. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29:123–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nerney MP, Chin MH, Jin L, et al. Factors associated with older patients’ satisfaction with care in an inner-city emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(2):140–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Byczkowski TL, Fitzgerald M, Kennebeck S, et al. A comprehensive view of parental satisfaction with pediatric emergency department visits. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62:340–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan L, Verdile V. Do patients receive adequate pain control after discharge from the ED? Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:705–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ducharme J, Barber CA. Prospective blinded study on emergency pain assessment and therapy. J Emerg Med. 1995;13:575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morris BJ, Jahangir AA, Sethi MK. Patient satisfaction: an emerging health policy issue. Am Acad Oth Surg 2013.

  27. Rao JK, Weinberger M, Kroenke K. Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1148–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. •• Smith RJ, Rhodes K, Paciotti B, et al. Patient perspectives of acute pain management in the era of the opioid epidemic. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66(3):246–52. Gives the perspective of the issues of pain management and addiction, as regards the current narcotic abuse epidemic.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. •• Zgierska A, Miller M, Rabago D. Patient satisfaction, prescription drug abuse, and potential unintended consequences. JAMA. 2012;307(13):1377–8. Gives the perspective of the issues of pain management and addiction, as regards the current narcotic abuse epidemic.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Office of National Drug Control Policy. Epidemic: responding to America’s prescription drug abuse crisis, 2011. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/issues-content/prescription-drugs/rx_abuse_plan_0.pdf.

  31. Frantsve LME, Kerns RD. Patient-provider interactions in the management of chronic pain: current findings within the context of shared medical decision making. Pain Med. 2007;8(1):25–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC grand rounds: prescription drug overdoses—a US epidemic. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:10–3.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hoppe JA, Nelson LS, Perrone J, et al. Opioid prescribing in a cross section of US emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66(3):253–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Manchikanti L, Abdi S, Atluri S, et al. American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) guidelines for responsible opioid prescribing in chronic non-cancer pain: part I—evidence assessment. Pain Phys. 2012;15(3 suppl):S1–S65.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Asim A, Gomes T, Zheng H, et al. Long-term analgesic use after low-risk surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:425–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ong S, Nakase J, Moran GJ, et al. Antibiotic use for emergency department patients with upper respiratory infections: prescribing practices, patient expectations, and patient satisfaction. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(3):213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pham HH, Landon BE, Reschovsky JD, et al. Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:972–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. • Chang JT, Hays RD, Shekelle PG, et al. Patients’ global ratings of their health care not associated with the technical quality of their care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(9):665–72. Show that patient satisfaction does not necessarily correlate with quality as perceived by the medical community or with clinical guidelines, effectively calling into question the integrity of patient satisfaction surveys themselves.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kravitz R. Patient satisfaction with health care: clinical outcome or trivial pursuit? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(4):280–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kravitz RL, Bell RA, Azari R, et al. Request fulfillment in office practice; antecedents and relationship to outcomes. Med Care. 2002;40(1):38–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gordon DB, Dahl JL, Miaskowski C, et al. American Pain Society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1574–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Timian A, Rupcic S, Kachnowski S, Luisi P. Do patients “like” good care? Measuring hospital quality via Facebook. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(5):374–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sullivan W, DeLucia J. 2+2=7. Seven things you may not know about press ganey statistics. Emergency physicians monthly. 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Faculty, Residency Program in Emergency Medicine, Metro Health Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Jonathan Glauser

  2. Assistant Clinical Professor Spine Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    Sarah R. Money

Authors
  1. Jonathan Glauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah R. Money
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Glauser.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glauser, J., Money, S.R. Safe and Rational Use of Analgesics: Non-Opioid Analgesics Alternatives to the Use of Narcotics in Emergency Pain Management. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep 5, 121–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40138-017-0145-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40138-017-0145-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation