Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nuances of Facelifting for the Male Patient

  • FACIAL PLASTICS: Facial Skin Rejuvenation (PJ Carniol and AE Brissett, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Cosmetic procedures, namely rhytidectomy and neck lifting, have become increasingly popular among male patients. However, there are nuances to preoperative evaluation and surgical techniques unique to males that must be considered in order to achieve optimal results. It is critical to not only evaluate the patient properly and master the techniques of these procedures, but to also decrease complications.

Recent Findings

Male patients require special attention to facial hair growth patterns, temporal sideburns, and beard growth color and density when determining the type of rhytidectomy incision to perform. Incisions along and into the postauricular hairline require a beveling technique to avoid transection of hair follicles, especially with short hair. Hematoma and seroma are complications which are more frequent with male patients that can be reduced with preoperative planning and postoperative management.

Summary

This review provides the knowledge to properly evaluate male patients for facial rejuvenation, to understand the nuances in rhytidectomy incisions and techniques for males, and to be aware of the complications and management of male facelifting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Rogers BO. The development of aesthetic plastic surgery: A history. Aesth Plast Surg. 1976;1:3–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Skoog, TG. Plastic Surgery: The aging face. In: Skoog, TG, ed. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1974.

  3. Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(1):53–61; discussion 62–3.

  4. Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. • Perkins SW, Waters HH. The extended SMAS approach to neck rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014;22(2):253–68. (This manuscript provides additional surgical detail and intraoperative photographs for the described facelift and anterior platysmaplasty for further clarification on technique.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2019 Plastic Surgery Statistics: Cosmetic Surgery in Males. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2019/cosmetic-procedures-men-2019.pdf

  7. Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM, Ramanadham S, Costa C, Dauwe PB. The Modern Male Rhytidectomy: Lessons Learned. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):295–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Daraei PP, Marshall RV, Adams AS, Rousso DE. The Male Facelift. Facial Plast Surg. 2020;36(4):404–15. (This is a comprehensive text on facial analysis, preoperative evaluation, surgical technique, post-operative care, and complication management for male rhytidectomy.)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grover R, Jones BM, Waterhouse N. The prevention of haematoma following rhytidectomy: A review of 1078 consecutive facelifts. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54(6):481–6. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2001.3623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moyer JS, Baker SR. Complications of rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005;13(3):469–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rousso DE, Rutherford KD. Biplanar superficial musculoaponeurotic system imbrication rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg. 2014;30(4):380–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Riefkohl R, Wolfe JA, Cox EB, McCarty KS Jr. Association between cutaneous occlusive vascular disease, cigarette smoking, and skin slough after rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77(4):592–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matarasso A, Elkwood A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M. National plastic surgery survey: Face lift techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1185–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker DC. Complications of cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg. 1983;10(3):543–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Varadharajan K, Beegun I, Daly N. Use of steroids for facial nerve paralysis after parotidectomy: A systematic review. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(2):180–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celeste Z. Nagy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical collection on FACIAL PLASTICS: Facial Skin Rejuvenation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagy, C.Z., Perkins, S.W. Nuances of Facelifting for the Male Patient. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 9, 457–466 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-021-00373-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-021-00373-3

Keywords

Navigation