Abstract
Purpose of Review
Cholangiocarcinoma is a primary malignancy of the biliary tree that comprises various anatomic and histologic subtypes. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the various imaging manifestations of cholangiocarcinoma in order to aid clinical radiologists in the diagnosis and classification of the complex malignancy, and to aid clinical colleagues in facilitating proper clinical management.
Recent Findings
Various imaging modalities may aid in the proper diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Recent studies have advocated the use of hepatobiliary phase magnetic resonance imaging following gadoxetic acid administration in order to improve lesion conspicuity and detection of satellite nodules and intrahepatic metastases.
Summary
Accurate recognition and classification of cholangiocarcinoma is essential for proper patient management. A thorough understanding of the different anatomic classifications, morphological patterns, and the mode of metastatic spread of cholangiocarcinoma is essential for radiologists involved in the interpretation of abdominal imaging studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance, •• Of major importance
Sainani NI, Catalano OA, Holalkere NS, Zhu AX, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Cholangiocarcinoma: current and novel imaging techniques. Radiographics. 2008;28(5):1263–87.
Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, An SK, Lee JW, Kim TK, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT and cholangiographic findings. Radiographics. 2002;22(1):173–87.
Tompkins RK, Saunders K, Roslyn JJ, Longmire WP Jr. Changing patterns in diagnosis and management of bile duct cancer. Ann Surg. 1990;211(5):614 discussion 20-1.
Lee WJ, Lim HK, Jang KM, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Lim JH, et al. Radiologic spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma: emphasis on unusual manifestations and differential diagnoses. Radiographics. 2001;21 Spec No:S97-S116.
Cancer AJCo. AJCC Cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
Lim JH, Kim YI, Park CK. Intraductal mucosal-spreading mucin-producing peripheral cholangiocarcinoma of the liver. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25(1):89–92.
Blechacz B, Komuta M, Roskams T, Gores GJ. Clinical diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8(9):512–22.
Lim JH. Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(3):819–27.
Lim JH, Yi CA, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Lee SJ, Kim SH. Radiological spectrum of intraductal papillary tumors of the bile ducts. Korean J Radiol. 2002;3(1):57–63.
Kim TK, Choi BI, Han JK, Jang HJ, Cho SG, Han MC. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma of the liver: two-phase spiral CT findings. Radiology. 1997;204(2):539–43.
Lim JH, Ko YT, Lee DH, Kim SY. Clonorchiasis: sonographic findings in 59 proved cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152(4):761–4.
Yoon KH, Ha HK, Kim CG, Roh BS, Yun KJ, Chae KM, et al. Malignant papillary neoplasms of the intrahepatic bile ducts: CT and histopathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(4):1135–9.
Ros PR, Buck JL, Goodman ZD, Ros AM, Olmsted WW. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1988;167(3):689–93.
• Chung YE, Kim MJ, Park YN, Choi JY, Pyo JY, Kim YC, et al. Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):683–700. The study accurately describes the various growth patterns of intraductal cholangiocarcinoma which was not described before facilitating the evaluation of these type of tumors.
Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Reichle R, Calhoun PS, Bliss DF, Scherrer A, et al. Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 1. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(6):1427–31.
Maetani Y, Itoh K, Watanabe C, Shibata T, Ametani F, Yamabe H, et al. MR imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(6):1499–507.
Wernecke K, Henke L, Vassallo P, von Bassewitz DB, Diederich S, Peters PE, et al. Pathologic explanation for hypoechoic halo seen on sonograms of malignant liver tumors: an in vitro correlative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159(5):1011–6.
Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Yamauchi T, Minami M, Yashiro N, et al. CT of hepatic masses: significance of prolonged and delayed enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146(4):729–33.
Lacomis JM, Baron RL, Oliver JH 3rd, Nalesnik MA, Federle MP. Cholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns. Radiology. 1997;203(1):98–104.
Vilgrain V, Van Beers BE, Flejou JF, Belghiti J, Delos M, Gautier AL, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: MRI and pathologic correlation in 14 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21(1):59–65.
Stoupis C, Taylor HM, Paley MR, Buetow PC, Marre S, Baer HU, et al. The Rocky liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation of calcified hepatic masses. Radiographics. 1998;18(3):675–85 quiz 726.
Kang Y, Lee JM, Kim SH, Han JK, Choi BI. Intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma: enhancement patterns on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images. Radiology. 2012;264(3):751–60.
Okabayashi T, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Takayama T, et al. A new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of preoperative and postoperative variables. Cancer. 2001;92(9):2374–83.
Mittelstaedt CA. Ultrasound of the bile ducts. Semin Roentgenol. 1997;32(3):161–71.
Robledo R, Muro A, Prieto ML. Extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: US characteristics and accuracy in demonstration of tumors. Radiology. 1996;198(3):869–73.
Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Kanazawa S, Charnsangavej C, Wallace S. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. An evaluation of subtypes with CT and angiography. Acta Radiol. 1992;33(4):351–5.
Choi BI, Lee JH, Han MC, Kim SH, Yi JG, Kim CW. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparative study with sonography and CT. Radiology. 1989;172(3):689–92.
Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Reichle R, Calhoun PS, Bliss DF, Scherrer A, et al. Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 2. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(6):1433–6.
Weinbren K, Mutum SS. Pathological aspects of cholangiocarcinoma. J Pathol. 1983;139(2):217–38.
• Lee JW, Han JK, Kim TK, Kim YH, Choi BI, Han MC, et al. CT features of intraductal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(3):721–5. This study provides a clear cut off value for smaller lesions that can be easily missed on imaging as well as explaining the unorthothox pattern of enhancement seen in intraductal tumors.
Kim YS, Myung SJ, Kim SY, Kim HJ, Kim JS, Park ET, et al. Biliary papillomatosis: clinical, cholangiographic and cholangioscopic findings. Endoscopy. 1998;30(9):763–7.
Loyer EM, Chin H, DuBrow RA, David CL, Eftekhari F, Charnsangavej C. Hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: enhancement patterns with quadruple phase helical CT–a comparative study. Radiology. 1999;212(3):866–75.
Han JK, Choi BI, Kim TK, Kim SW, Han MC, Yeon KM. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: thin-section spiral CT findings with cholangiographic correlation. Radiographics. 1997;17(6):1475–85.
Valls C, Ruiz S, Martinez L, Leiva D. Radiological diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;5(7):115–26.
Chung YE, Kim MJ, Park YN, Lee YH, Choi JY. Staging of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(10):2182–95.
•• van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ. Changing perspectives in the assessment of resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(7):1969–71. This study added a new prespective in reporting cholangiocarcinoma by mentioning the importance of biliary variations that has direct implicaiton on the surgical management.
Lee HY, Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim SW, Jang JY, Han JK, et al. Preoperative assessment of resectability of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma: combined CT and cholangiography with revised criteria. Radiology. 2006;239(1):113–21.
Ito F, Cho CS, Rikkers LF, Weber SM. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: current management. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):210–8.
Baron RL, Stanley RJ, Lee JK, Koehler RE, Melson GL, Balfe DM, et al. A prospective comparison of the evaluation of biliary obstruction using computed tomography and ultrasonography. Radiology. 1982;145(1):91–8.
Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KW, Park SW, Lee JK, Kim JS, et al. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology. 2004;233(1):234–40.
Hann LE, Greatrex KV, Bach AM, Fong Y, Blumgart LH. Cholangiocarcinoma at the hepatic hilus: sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(4):985–9.
Hayashi M, Matsui O, Ueda K, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, Gabata T, et al. Imaging findings of mucinous type of cholangiocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20(3):386–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Omneya Yakout Dogheim declares no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical collection on Liver and Gastrointestinal Imaging.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dogheim, O.Y., Rizvani, M. Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnosis and Pre-operative Evaluation. Curr Radiol Rep 4, 40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-016-0168-6
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-016-0168-6