Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fetal Cardiac Intervention: a Review of the Current Literature

  • Cardiology (W Zuckerman and E Silver, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Pediatrics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Congenital heart disease (CHD), the most common of birth defects, can be serious enough to require a lifetime of medical care including multiple surgeries or other interventions.

Recent Findings

Advances in ultrasound technology and a better understanding of the progression of CHDs have made it possible to intervene in utero. This early-stage intervention allows the still plastic cardiovascular system to return to a more normal trajectory thus sparing the newborn from negative consequences to morbidity and mortality.

Summary

Fetal cardiac intervention (FCI) has been successful altering the course of right and left ventricular disease. This bodes well for expanding the use of FCI to lead to better postnatal adaptation and improved long-term function for more children with CHD. However, optimism with success must be tempered with small numbers of procedures performed thus far and current efforts with international registries and multi-centered studies are extremely important to document improved survival and resultant biventricular outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 6
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moon-Grady AJ, Morris SA, et al. International fetal cardiac intervention registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:387–99.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tulzer G, Gardiner H. Cardiac interventions in the fetus: potential for right-sided lesions. Fetal interventions in right heart disease. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;22:79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eibschitz I, Abinader EG, Klein A, Sharf M. Intrauterine diagnosis and control of fetal ventricular arrhythmia during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;122:597–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gardiner H. Progression of fetal heart disease and rationale for fetal intracardiac interventions. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;10:578–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wohlmuth C, Tulzer G, Artz W, Gitter R, Werashnigg D. Maternal aspects of fetal cardiac intervention. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:532–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pavlovic M, Acharya G, Huhta JC. Controversies of fetal cardiac intervention. Early Hum Dev. 2008;84(3):149–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell MEIR, Gaynor JW, Wernosky G, Nicolson S, Spray TL. Intermediate outcomes after the Fontan procedure in the current era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:172–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. AK GNS, Tabbut S, Atz AM, Clabby ML, Cooper DS, Eghtesady P, et al. Interstage mortality after the Norwood procedure; results of the multi-center Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:896–906.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams IASL, Colan SD, Lu M, Stephenson EA, Newburger JW, Gersony WM, et al. Functional state following the Fontan procedure. Cardiol Young. 2009;19:320–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Allan LD, Sharland G, Tynan MJ. The natural history of the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 1989;25:341–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Danford DA, Cronican P. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: progression of left ventricular dilation and dysfunction to left ventricular hypoplasia in utero. Am Heart J. 1992;123:1712–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simpson JM, Sharland GK. Natural history and outcome of aortic stenosis diagnosed prenatally. Heart. 1997;77:205–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. McCaffrey FM, Sherman FS. Prenatal diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol. 1997;18:276–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Makikallio KMD, Levine JC, Marx GR, Colan SD, Marshall AC, Lock JE, et al. Fetal aortic valve stenosis and the evolution of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: patient selection for fetal intervention. Circulation. 2006;113:1401–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Selamet Tierney ES, Wald RM, McElhinney DB, Marshall AC, Benson CB, Colan SD, et al. Changes in left heart hemodynamics after technically successful in-utero aortic valvuloplasty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:715–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prosnitz AR, Drogosz M, Marshall AC, Wilkins-Haug LE, Benson CB, Sleeper LA, et al. Early hemodynamic changes after fetal aortic stenosis valvuloplasty predict biventricular circulation at birth. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38:286–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McElhinney DB, Marshall AC, Wilkins-Haug LE, Brown DW, Benson CB, Silva V, et al. Predictors of technical success and postnatal biventricular outcome after in utero aortic valvuloplasty for aortic stenosis with evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation. 2009;120:1482–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman KG, Sleeper LA, Freud LR, Marshall AC, Godfrey ME, Drogosz M, et al. Improved technical success, postnatal outcome and refined predictors of outcome for fetal aortic valvuloplasty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:212–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Freud LR, McElhinney DB, Marshall AC, Marx GR, Friedman KG, del Nido PJ, et al. Fetal aortic valvuloplasty for evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome: postnatal outcomes of the first 100 patients. Circulation. 2014;130:638–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kovacevic A, Ohman A, Tulzer G, Herberg U, Dangel J, Carvalho JS, et al. Fetal hemodynamic response to aortic valvuloplasty and postnatal outcome: a European multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:221–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedman KG, Margossian R, Graham DA, Harrild DM, Emani SM, Wilkins-Haug LE, et al. Postnatal left ventricular diastolic function after fetal aortic valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:556–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman KG, Freud L, Escobar-Diaz M, Banka P, Emani S, Tworetzky W. Left ventricular remodeling and function in children with biventricular circulation after fetal aortic valvuloplasty. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36:1502–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Laraja K, Sadhwani A, Tworetzky W, Marshall AC, Gauvreau K, Freud L, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in children after fetal cardiac intervention for aortic stenosis with evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Pediatr. 2017;184:130–6 e4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rychik J, Rome JJ, Collins MH, DeCampli WM, Spray TL. The hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum: atrial morphology, pulmonary vascular histopathology and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:554–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glatz JA, Tabbutt S, Gaynor JW, Rome JJ, Montenegro L, Spray TL, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with atrial level restriction in the era of prenatal diagnosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1633–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Szwast A, Tian Z, McCann M, Donaghue D, Rychik J. Vasoreactive response to maternal hyperoxygenation in the fetus with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:172–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Marshall AC, Van Der Velde ME, Tworetzky W, et al. Creation of an atrial septal defect in utero for fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact or highly restrictive atrial septum. Circulation. 2004;110:253–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Olivieri L, Ratnayaka K, Levy RJ, Berger J, Wessel D, Donofrio M. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum sequelae of left atrial hypertension in utero. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:e369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schidlow DN, Freud L, Friedman K, Tworetzky W. Fetal interventions for structural heart disease. Echocardiography. 2017;34:1834–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Divanović A, Hor K, Cnota J, Hirsch R, Kinsel-Ziter M, Michelfelder E. Prediction and perinatal management of severely restrictive atrial septum in fetuses with critical left heart obstruction: clinical experience using pulmonary venous Doppler analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:988–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kalish BT, Tworetzky W, Benson CB, Wilkins-Haug L, Mizrahi-Arnaud A, McElhinney D, et al. Technical challenges of atrial septal stent placement in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:77–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marshall A, Levine J, et al. Results of in utero atrial septoplasty in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:1023–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chaturvedi RR, Ryan G, Seed M, Van Arsdell G, Jaeggi ET. Fetal stenting of the atrial septum: technique and initial results in cardiac lesions with left atrial hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:2029–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. • Edwards A, Veldman A, et al. A percutaneous fetal cardiac catheterization technique for pulmonary valvuloplasty and valvulotomy in mid-gestation lamb model. Prenatal Diag. 2015;35:74–80 Excellent paper on basic science research for fetal cardiac intervention.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. • Fontes-Pedra SRF, Peralta CFA, et al. Fetal interventions for congenital heart disease in Brazil. Pediatric Cardiol. 2014;35:399–405 Large cohort of patients undergoing fetal cardiac intervention.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gomez-Montes E, Herraiz I, Medoza A, Galindo A. Fetal intervention in right outflow tract obstructive disease: selection of candidates and results. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Huhta J, Quintero RA, Suh E, Bader R. Advances in fetal cardiac intervention. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004;16:487–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kohl T. Fetal echocardiography: new grounds to explore during fetal cardiac intervention. Pediatr Cardiol. 2002;23:334–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. • Tulzer A, Arzt W, Gitter R, Prandstetter C, Grohmann E, Mair R, et al. Immediate effects and outcome of in-utero pulmonary valvuloplasty in fetuses with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum or critical pulmonary stenosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:230–7 Excellent review of a large cohort of patients undergoing fetal cardiac intervention.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tulzer G, Arzt W, Franklin RCG, Loughna P, Mair R, Gardiner HM. Fetal pulmonary valvuloplasty for critical pulmonary stenosis or atresia with intact septum. Lancet. 2002;360:1567–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tworetzky W, McElhinney D, Marx GR, Benson CB, Brusseau R, Morash D, et al. In utero valvuloplasty for pulmonary atresia with hypoplastic right ventricle: techniques and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e510–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gardiner H, Belmar C, Tulzer G, Barlow A, Pasquini L, Carvalho JS, et al. Morphologic and functional predictors of eventual circulation in the fetus with pulmonary atresia or critical pulmonary stenosis with intact septum. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1299–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Salvin J, McElhinney D, Colan SD, Gauvreau K, del Nido P, Jenkins KJ, et al. Fetal tricuspid valve size and growth as predictors of outcome in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e415–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Roman KS, Fouron JC, Nii M, Smallhorn JF, Chaturvedi R, Jaeggi ET. Determinants of outcome in fetal pulmonary valve stenosis or atresia with intact ventricular septum. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:699–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McElhinney D, Tworetzky W, Lock J. Current status of fetal cardiac intervention. Circulation. 2010;121:1256–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Friedman KG, Sleeper LA, Freud LR, Marshall AC, Godfrey ME, Drogosz M, et al. Improved technical success, postnatal outcome and refined predictors of outcome for fetal aortic valvuloplasty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:212–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Marshall AC, Tworetzky W, Bergersen L, McElhinney DB, Benson CB, Jennings RW, et al. Aortic valvuloplasty in the fetus: technical characteristics of successful balloon dilation. J Pediatr. 2005;147:535–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mizrahi-Arnaud A, Tworetzky W, Bulich LA, Wilkins-Haug LE, Marshall AC, Benson CB, et al. Pathophysiology, management, and outcomes of fetal hemodynamic instability during prenatal cardiac intervention. Pediatr Res. 2007;62:325–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Galindo A, Gomez-Montes E, Gomez O, Bennasar M, Crispi F, Herraiz I, et al. Fetal aortic valvuloplasty: experience and results of two tertiary centers in Spain. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;42:262–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wohlmuth C, Tulzer G, Arzt W, Gitter R, Wertaschnigg D. Maternal aspects of fetal cardiac intervention. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:532–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the following team members, without them this procedure would not be possible at our institution:

“Mom and Dad”

The Congenital Heart Collaborative Leadership

Aimee Armstrong – Interventionalist

Martin Bocks – Interventionalist

Jim Strainic – Fetal Cardiologist

Karen Texter – Fetal Cardiologist

Ellie Ragsdale – MFM

Lora Levin – OB Anesthesia

Mike Lilly – OB Anesthesia

Tiffanie McCourt – Fetal coordinator

Liz Ruzga – OB patient navigator

Katie O’Neill – cath lab NP

Stacey Carey – cath lab RN

Bernadette Richards – sonographer

Monica Mielcarek – sonographer

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Strainic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Armstrong reports personal fees from Medtronic Inc.; grants from Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.; grants and personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences; personal fees from Abbott; and personal fees from the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission. Dr. Strainic declares no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strainic, J., Armstrong, A. Fetal Cardiac Intervention: a Review of the Current Literature. Curr Pediatr Rep 8, 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-020-00209-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-020-00209-6

Keywords

Navigation