Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Metal Cations in the Plains of Humid Subtropical Northeastern India

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analysis and interpolation of soil micronutrients are very important for site-specific management. The objective of this study was to determine the spatial distribution of iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) in the forest covered area of Chirang district, Assam, using statistics and geostatistics. A total of 607 soil samples from a depth of 0–25 cm at an approximate interval of 1 km were collected over the entire study area. The concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu ranged between 0.10–263.5, 0.50–149.5, 0.01–3.4 and 0.64–14.6 mg/kg, respectively, with mean values of 45.3, 19.6, 0.4 and 5.0 mg/kg, respectively. Analysis of semivariogram indicated that the Fe and Mn were well described with the spherical model, with the distance of spatial dependence being 5.83 and 1.95 km, respectively, while the Zn and Cu were well described with exponential model, with the distance of spatial dependence being 5.24 and 3.95 km, respectively. To define different classes of spatial dependence for the soil variables, the ratio of nugget and sill was used. Cu was strongly spatially dependent, with the nugget/sill being 0.202 in this given region, while Fe, Mn and Zn were moderately spatially dependent, with the nugget/sill being 0.347, 0.299 and 0.426, respectively. With the kriging analysis, the spatial distribution maps of contents of these four micronutrients in the study area were drawn with the ArcGIS software. It was found that the soils with higher content of Fe, Mn and Zn were mainly distributed in the upper area of the northern part of the study area, while the soils with higher content of Cu were mainly distributed in the center, decreasing toward the south, east and west.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alloway BJ (2008) Micronutrients and crop production: an introduction. In: Alloway BJ (ed) Micronutrient deficiency, in global crop production. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aravind P, Prassad MNV (2004) Zinc protects chloroplasts and associated photochemical functions in cadmium exposed Ceratophyllum demersum L., a fresh water macrophyte. Plant Sci 166:1321–1327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cambardella CA, Moorman AT, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale heterogeneity of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen H, Shen Z, Liu G, Tong Z (2009) Spatial heterogeneity of available zinc, copper, and manganese in Xiangcheng tobacco planting fields, Henan Province, China. Front Biol China 4:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chien YJ, Lee DY, Guo HY (1997) Geostatistics analysis of soil properties of mid-west Taiwan soils. Soil Sci 162:291–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chinchmalatpure Anil R, Nayak AK, Rao GG (2005) Spatial variability and mapping of extractable boron in soils of Bara tract under Sardar Sarovar canal command area of Gujarat. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 53:330–336

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis BM (1987) Uses and abuses of cross-validation in geostatistics. Math Geol 19:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deutsch CV, Journal AG (1992) Geostatistical software library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gerd D, Jozef D, Gerard G (2003) Spatial variability in soil properties on slow-forming terraces in the Andes region of Ecuador. Soil Tillage Res 72:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gotway CA, Herget GW (1997) Incorporating spatial trends and anisotropy in geostatistical mapping of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:298–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopez-Granados F, Jurado-Exposito M, Atenciano S, Gracia-Ferrer A, De La Orden MS, Gracia-Toreres L (2002) Spatial variability of agricultural soil parameters in Southern Spain. Plant Soil 246:97–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mabit L, Bernard C (2007) Assessment of spatial distribution of fallout radionuclides through geostatistics concept. J Environ Radioact 97:206–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nayak AK, Chinchmalatpure Anil R, Khandelwal MK, Gururaja Rao G, Nath Abhay Munshi HY, Tyagi NK (2002) Geostatistical analysis of surface and sub-surface soil salinity of irrigation block of Sardar Sarovar canal command. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 50:283–287

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reza SK, Sarkar D, Baruah U (2012) Spatial variability of soil properties in Brahmaputra plains of North-eastern India: a geostatistical approach. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 60:108–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reza SK, Sarkar D, Baruah U, Das TH (2010) Evaluation and comparison of ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting methods for prediction of spatial variability of some chemical parameters of Dhalai district, Tripura. Agropedology 20:38–48

    Google Scholar 

  17. Santra P, Chopra UK, Chakraborty D (2008) Spatial variability of soil properties and its application in predicting surface map of hydraulic parameters in an agricultural farm. Curr Sci 95:937–945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schloeder CA, Zimmermen NE, Jacobs MJ (2001) Comparison of methods for interpolating soil properties using limited data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:470–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sen TK, Chamuah GS, Sehgal J, Velayuthum M (1999) Soils of Assam for optimizing land use. National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, NBSS Publ. No. 66

  20. Voltz M, Webster R (1990) A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for redicting soil properties from sample information. J Soil Sci 41:473–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Digtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Warrick AW (1998) Spatial variability. In: Hillel D (ed) Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, New York, pp 655–675

    Google Scholar 

  23. Webster R, Oliver MA (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  24. Welch RM (1995) Micronutrient nutrition of plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 14:49–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. White JG, Welch RM, Norvell WA (1997) Soil zinc map of the USA using geostatistics and geographic information systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:185–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yost RS, Uehara G, Fox RL (1982) Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas I. Semi-variogram. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:1028–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao XY, Zuo XA, Zhao HL, Zhang TH, Li YQ, Yi XY (2006) Spatial variability of soil moisture after rainfall in different type sands of Horqin Sand. Arid Land Geogr 29:275–281

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Reza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reza, S.K., Baruah, U., Singh, S.K. et al. Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Metal Cations in the Plains of Humid Subtropical Northeastern India. Agric Res 5, 346–352 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0217-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0217-7

Keywords

Navigation