Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The “Choosing Wisely” initiative in infectious diseases

  • Review
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

“Choosing Wisely” is a growing international campaign aiming at practice changes to improve patient health and safety by both, conduct of essential and avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic procedures. The goal is to create an easily recognizable and distributable list (“Choosing Wisely items”) that addresses common over- and underuse in the management of infectious diseases.

Methods

The German Society of Infectious Diseases (DGI) participates in the campaign “Klug Entscheiden” by the German Society of Internal Medicine. Committee members of the (DGI) listed potential ‘Choosing Wisely items’. Topics were subjected to systematic evidence review and top ten items were selected for appropriateness. Five positive and negative recommendations were approved via individual member vote.

Results

The final recommendations are: (1) Imperatively start antimicrobial treatment and remove the focus in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. (2) Critically ill patients with signs of infection need early appropriate antibiotic therapy. (3) Annual influenza vaccination should be given to individuals with age >60 years, patients with specific co-morbidities and to contact persons who may spread influenza to others. (4) All children should receive measles vaccine. (5) Prefer oral formulations of highly bioavailable antimicrobials whenever possible. (6) Avoid prescribing antibiotics for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections. (7) Do not treat asymptomatic bacteriuria with antibiotics. (8) Do not treat Candida detected in respiratory or gastrointestinal tract specimens. (9) Do not prolong prophylactic administration of antibiotics in patients after they have left the operating room. (10) Do not treat an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin with antibiotics for patients without signs of infection.

Conclusions

Physicians will reduce potential harm to patients and increase the value of health care when implementing these recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaasch AJ, Barlow G, Edgeworth JD, et al. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a pooled analysis of five prospective, observational studies. J Infect. 2014;68:242–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. López-Cortés LE, Del Toro MD, Gálvez-Acebal J, et al. Impact of an evidence-based bundle intervention in the quality-of-care management and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1225–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fries BL, Licitra C, Crespo A, et al. Infectious diseases consultation and the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:598–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thwaites GE, Edgeworth JD, Gkrania-Klotsas E, et al. Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:208–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holland TL, Arnold C, Fowler VG. Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review. JAMA. 2014;312:1330–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Levy MM, Artigas A, Phillips GS, et al. Outcomes of the surviving sepsis campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:919–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1589–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bödeker B, Remschmidt C, Schmich P, Wichmann O. Why are older adults and individuals with underlying chronic diseases in Germany not vaccinated against flu? A population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Uyeki TM. Preventing and controlling influenza with available interventions. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:789–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. http://flunewseurope.org. Accessed 19.10.2016 2016.

  12. Mina MJ, Metcalf CJ, de Swart RL, Osterhaus AD, Grenfell BT. Long-term measles-induced immunomodulation increases overall childhood infectious disease mortality. Science. 2015;348:694–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C. Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;CD004407.

  14. http://measlesrubellainitiative.org. Accessed 19.10.2016.

  15. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/. Accessed 19.10.2016.

  16. MacGregor RR, Graziani AL. Oral administration of antibiotics: a rational alternative to the parenteral route. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:457–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nathwani D, Lawson W, Dryden M, et al. Implementing criteria-based early switch/early discharge programmes: a European perspective. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:S47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shapiro DJ, Hicks LA, Pavia AT, Hersh AL. Antibiotic prescribing for adults in ambulatory care in the USA, 2007-09. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:234–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnett ML, Linder JA. Antibiotic prescribing for adults with acute bronchitis in the United States, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2014;311:2020–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hersh AL, Jackson MA, Hicks LA. Diseases AAoPCoI. Principles of judicious antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2013;132:1146–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zalmanovici trestioreanu A, Lador A, Sauerbrun-Cutler MT, Leibovici L. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:534.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weiskopf J, Scott S. Asymptomatic bacteriuria, what are you treating? JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:344–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicolle LE. Management of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:1252–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coussement J, Abramowicz D. Should we treat asymptomatic bacteriuria after renal transplantation? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:260–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meersseman W, Lagrou K, Spriet I, et al. Significance of the isolation of Candida species from airway samples in critically ill patients: a prospective, autopsy study. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1526–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindau S, Nadermann M, Ackermann H, et al. Antifungal therapy in patients with pulmonary Candida spp. colonization may have no beneficial effects. J Intensive Care. 2015;3:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cornely OA, Bassetti M, Calandra T, et al. ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:19–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. ten Oever J, Netea MG, Kullberg BJ. Utility of immune response-derived biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory disorders. J Infect. 2016;72:1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Galarraga B, Khan F, Kumar P, Pullar T, Belch JJ. C-reactive protein: the underlying cause of microvascular dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47:1780–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:448–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Auer J, Berent R, Eber B, et al. C-reactive protein in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109:E20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morden NE, Colla CH, Sequist TD, Rosenthal MB. Choosing wisely–the politics and economics of labeling low-value services. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:589–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolfson D, Santa J, Slass L. Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign. Acad Med. 2014;89:990–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jung N, Lehmann C, Fätkenheuer G. The, “Choosing Wisely”: initiative in infectious diseases. Infection. 2016;44:283–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clara Lehmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this manuscript was reported by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lehmann, C., Berner, R., Bogner, J.R. et al. The “Choosing Wisely” initiative in infectious diseases. Infection 45, 263–268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-017-0997-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-017-0997-0

Keywords

Navigation