Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Desalination plant feasibility and site selection on the southern Caspian Sea coasts using SAW and TOPSIS multi-criteria analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regarding the development of the northern provinces of Iran, which are considered the most populated part of the Caspian coast, the provision of water resources is one of the main priorities, especially in the tourism industry and the development of coastal settlements. As a result, seawater desalination is an appropriate solution to meet rising water demand in most coastal areas. This research has the aim of investigating the possibility of using desalination technology and detecting suitable places for the construction of desalination plants on the southern coasts of the Caspian region. In this study, the construction of desalination plant units was prioritized and ordered based on multi-criteria decision-making methods using capacity and environmental strength, considering coastal and marine environmental, technical, and operational criteria such as water quality, distance from the estuary, land use restrictions, and socio-economic criteria including water consumption and population. The results obtained using techniques for ordering preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and simple additive weighting (SAW) methods showed that Mahmoudabad, based on decision models, is the most appropriate and sustainable place to participate in desalination. The coastal area of Nowshahr is determined to be the most inappropriate. In addition, desalination discharge limitations are a determining factor in the location and design of these units on the southern coasts of the Caspian Sea. Due to distributed environmental restrictions in the Caspian coastal areas, the construction of small desalination units and the use of modern saline wastewater management approaches are highly recommended to control environmental issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis.

  2. Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD).

References

  • Abdel-malak FF, Issa UH, Miky YH, Osman EA (2017) Applying decision-making techniques to Civil Engineering Projects. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 6(2017):326–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Aish AM, Zaqoot HA, Abdeljawad SM (2015) Artificial neural network approach for predicting reverse osmosis desalination plants performance in the Gaza Strip. Desalination 367(2015):240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al Garni HZ, Awasthi A (2017) Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhrari MS, Agha K, Alghoul SK (2014) Development of decision support system for optimal site selection of desalination plants. J Mech Civ Eng 11(6):84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh S, Alavipoor FS, Karimi S, Khaledi J (2019) Site selection for a combined-cycle power plant using fuzzy AHP and OWA method (case study: Qazvin Province). J Environ Sci Technol 21(3):1–18 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Amante C, Eakins BW (2009) ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis NOAA Tech. Memo. NESDIS NGDC-24 10. http://ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/global.html

  • Arab AA, Pourghasemi HR, Cerda A (2018) Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: a comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models. Sci Total Environ 613–614(2018):1385–1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Golitsyn GS, Mokhov II, Semenov VA, Sporyshev PV (2000) connection between Caspian Sea level variability and ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 27(17). https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL002374

  • Aydin F, Sarptas H (2019) Spatial assessment of site suitability for solar desalination plants: a case study of the coastal regions of Turkey. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01783-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badi I, Ballem M, Shetwan A (2018) Site selection of desalination plant in Libya by using combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method. Int J Qual Res 12(3):609–624 (ISSN 1800-6450)

    Google Scholar 

  • Celik E, Gul M, Gumus AT, Guneri AF (2012) A Fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on trapezoidal numbers to material selection problem. J Inf Technol Appl Manag 19(3):19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Park MH (2019) Assessing vertical and horizontal movements of algal blooms in a coastal water using satellite remote sensing for optimal operation of desalination plants. Water Supply 19(7):2123–2130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Yu J, Khan S (2010) Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS based land suitability evaluation. Environ Model Softw 25(12):1582–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Pekker T, Wilson CR, Tapley BD (2017) Long-term Caspian Sea level change. Geophys Res Lett 44(13). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073958

  • Dawoud O, Ahmed T, Abdel-Latif M, Abunada Z (2020) A spatial multi-criteria analysis approach for planning and management of community-scale desalination plants. Desalination 485:114426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dweiri F, Khan SA, Almulla A (2018) A multi-criteria decision support system to rank sustainable desalination plant location criteria. Desalination 444(2018):26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffour N, Bundschuh J, Mahmoudi H, Goosen MF (2015) Renewable energy driven desalination technologies: a comprehensive review on challenges and potential applications of integrated systems. Desalination 356:94–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, p 225

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IDA water security handbook points to robust increase in desalination and water reuse for 2019

  • International Desalinaton Assosiation (IDA) (2017) IDA desalination yearbook 2016–2017. Water desalination report

  • International Desalination Association Website (online). https://idadesal.org. Cited 02 Jan 2019

  • Manju S, Sagar N (2017) Renewable energy integrated desalination: A sustainable solution to overcome future fresh-water scarcity in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 73:594–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazandaran Urban Water and Sewerage Company (2016) Mazandaran Province water supply status report, Mazandaran Urban Water and Sewerage Deputy, Ministry of Energy (in Persian)

  • Mogheir Y, Foul AA, Abuhabib AA, Mohammad AW (2013) Assessment of large-scale brackish water desalination plants in the Gaza Strip. Desalination 314(2013):96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed SA (2020) Application of geo-spatial analytical hierarchy process and multi criteria analysis for site suitability of the desalination solar stations in Egypt. J Afr Earth Sc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozyavas A, Khan SD, Casey JF (2010) A possible connection of Caspian Sea level fluctuations with meteorological factors and seismicity. Earth Planet. Sci Lett 299(1):150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.08.030

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadri S, Rahmani F (2019) Desalination site selection process in the coastal areas with the approach of energy cost reduction (case study: South of Iran). Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util Environ Effects. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1671556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Lozano JM, Garcia-Cascales MS, Lamata MT (2013) Decision criteria for optimal location of solar plants: photovoltaic and thermoelectric. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5143-2_4

  • Sataee Sh, Malek J, Shahini Sh (2008) Estimation of shoreline length in the southern coast of the Caspian Sea using satellite data. Caspian sea National Research Center report (in Persian)

  • Sepehr M, Fatemi SMR, Danehkar A, Mashinchian Moradi A (2017) Application of Delphi method in site selection of desalination plants. Glob J Environ Sci Manag 3(1):89–102. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2017.03.01.009. (Winter 2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi MP, McHugh A, Anda M, Ho G (2015) Comparative economic and environmental assessments of centralized and decentralised seawater desalination options. Desalination 376:25–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The United Nations World Water Development Report. 2019

  • The United Nations (2016) World water development report 2016: WATER AND JOBS facts and figures

  • Wang YJ, Lee HS (2007) Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group. Comput Math Appl 53(11):1762–1772

  • Wang Z, Wang Y, Xua G, Ren J (2019) Sustainable desalination process selection: decision support framework under hybrid information. Desalination 465(2019):44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.04.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is based on a Ph.D. thesis, with technical and financial assistance from Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University and the Caspian Sea National Research Center's water research institute. The authors would like to thank all of the sponsors.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Solaimani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banihashemi, S.M., Solaimani, K. & Yousefi Kebria, D. Desalination plant feasibility and site selection on the southern Caspian Sea coasts using SAW and TOPSIS multi-criteria analysis. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 9521–9536 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05044-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05044-y

Keywords

Navigation