Abstract
Urban environment has evolved over time and space, as the outcome of dynamic interactions between socioeconomic and biophysical processes operating over multiple scales. In the case of infinite expansion of urban population and human activities beyond “limit of urban capacity,” local urbanites would never achieve prosperity, but also be disordered by deteriorations within socioeconomic and ecological aspects. On this basis, this study aims to suggest a GIS-based model, combined of TOPSIS along with fuzzy modeling, in GIS environ, in order to evaluate Urban Environment Carrying Capacity. Suggested model was planned on the basis of desirable and the maximum accepted limits of chosen indicators, used to determine hot spots. To this aim, Shemiran City was studied. Results showed that at the studied area, 43, 44 and 10% had Degree 2 (low pressure), Degree 3 (median pressure) and Degree 4 (maximum pressure) of carrying capacity, respectively; also, only 3% was at critical state. None of the studied districts has desirable degree of carrying capacity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology: integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. University of Washington, Springer Press, Seattle
Amiri MJ, Mahiny AS, Hosseini SM, Jalali SG, Ezadkhasty Z, Karami S (2013) OWA analysis for ecological capability assessment in watersheds. Int J Environ Res 7(1):241–254, Winter 2013. ISSN: 1735-6865
Badenko V, Kurtener D (2004) Fuzzy modeling in GIS environment to support sustainable land use planning. In: 7th AGILE conference on geographic information science, 29 April–1 May 2004, Heraklion, Greece Parallel Session 4.1. Geographic Knowledge Discovery
Button K (2002) City management and urban environmental indicators. Ecol Econ 40:217–233
Chang H, Lio J, Chen W (2012) Protection priority in the coastal environment using a hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method on the Miaoli coast, Taiwan. Coast Educ Res Found 28(2):369–374. doi:10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00092.1
Chen TY, Tsao CY (2008) The interval-valued Fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159(11):1410–1428
Chennamaneni R, Rao S (2007) Assessment of urban carrying capacity: a case study of environmental and institutional implications for water resource management in hyderabad. Dept. of Resource Economics Faculty of Agriculture and Horticulture, Humboldt- University of Berlin, Germany
Deakin M, Mitchel G, Nigkamp p, Vreeker R (2007) Sustainable Urban Development. Vol 2: The Environmental Assessment Methods. Routledge, p 531
EEAC (2002) Europian Environment and Sustainable Development Advising Concil. Urban Development Policies for the EU
European Commission-Eurostat (2001) Environmental sustainability indicators in urban areas: an Italian experience. Working Paper No. 16
Frank E, Verdonk Y, Edelman D (1997) Capacity building for the urban environment: a comparative research, training and experience exchange. Project paper No.11. Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Godschalk D, Axler N (1977) Carrying capacity applications in growth management: a reconnaissance. Department of Building Construction and Urban Development, Washington, DC
Godschalk D, Parker F (1975) Carrying capacity: a key to environmental planning. J Soil Water Conserv 30(4):160–165
Graymore MLM, Sipe NG, Rickson RE (2008) Regional sustainability: how useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale? Ecol Econ 67:362–372
Graymore MLM, Sipe NG, Rickson RE (2010) Sustaining human carrying capacity: a tool for regional sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 69:459–468
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York
Joardar SD (1998) Carrying capacities and standards as bases towards urban infrastructure planning in india: a case of urban water supply and sanitation. Habitat Int 22:327–337
Kristensen P (2004) The DPSIR framework. Workshop on a comprehensive/detailed assessment of the vulnerability of water resources to environmental change in Africa using river basin approach. UNEP Headquarters, Nairobi
Lee C (1999) A study on the environmental capacity assessment of Seoul (I). Seoul Development Institute, Seoul
Lee S, Oh K, Jung S (2009) The carrying capacity assessment framework for ubiquitous-ecological cities in Korea. In: 2nd International urban design conference, Gold Coast 2009, Australia
Li F, Liu XS, Hu D, Wang RS, Yang WR, Li D, Zhao D (2009) Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: a case study for China’s Jining City. Landsc Urban Plan 90:134–142
Liu HM (2012) Comprehensive carrying capacity of the urban agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Habitat Int 36:462–470
Makhdoum M (1999) Fundamentals of land use planning, 3rd edn. Tehran University Publications, Tehran
Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60:498–508
Oh K, Jeong Y, Lee D, Lee W (2002) An integrated framework for the assessment of urban carrying capacity. J Korean Plan Assoc 2002(37):7–26
Oh K, Jeong Y, Lee D, Lee W, Choi H (2005) Determining development density using the Urban Carrying Capacity Assessment System. Landsc Urban Plan 73(1):1–15
Onishi T (1994) A capacity approach for sustainable urban development: an empirical study. J Reg Stud Assoc 28(1):39–51
Qiu F, Chastain B, Zhou Y, Zhang C, Sridharan H (2014) Modeling land suitability/capability using fuzzy evaluation. GeoJournal 79:167–182
Schneider D et al (1978) The carrying capacity concept as a planning tool. American Planning Association, Chicago
Shen LY, Ochoa JJ, Shah MN, Zhang XL (2011) The application of urban sustainability indicators—a comparison between various practices. Habitat Int 35:17–29
Shi Y, Wang H, Yin C (2013) Evaluation method of urban land population carrying capacity based on GIS—a case of Shanghai, China. Comput Environ Urban Syst 39:27–38
Tehrani N, Makhdoum M (2013) Implementing a Spatial Model of Urban Carrying Capacity Load Number (UCCLN) to monitor the environmental loads of urban ecosystems. Case study: Tehran metropolis. Ecol Ind 32:197–211
UN (2007) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies, 3rd edn. United Nations, New York
UNDP (1996) Human Development Report. Oxford University Press, New York
Wang H, Yan J, Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, Poot J (2014) Spatial-temporal differentiation of the carrying capacity of cities: a case study of Hunan Province. Reg Sci Policy Pract 6(4):383–394
Wei Y, Huang C, Lam PTI, Yuan ZY (2015a) Sustainable urban development: a review on urban carrying capacity assessment. Habitat Int 46:64–71
Wei Y, Huang C, Lam PTI, Sha Y, Feng Y (2015b) Using urban-carrying capacity as a benchmark for sustainable urban development: an empirical study of Beijing. Sustainability 7:3244–3268
Widodo B, Lupyanto R, Sulistiono B, Harjito DA, Hamidin J, Hapsari E, Yasin M, Ellinda C (2015) Analysis of environmental carrying capacity for the development of sustainable settlement in Yogyakarta urban area. Proc Environ Sci 28:519–527
Wu J, Wu T (2012) Sustainability indicators and indices: Handbook of Sustainable Management. Imperial College Press, London, pp 65–86
Zhang L, Xu J (2010) Combining AHP with GIS for evaluating environmental carrying capacity in Shaanxi Province, China. In: International conference on challenges in environmental science and computer engineering, vol 01, pp 3–6
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to express their acknowledgements of IT experts of Tehran and Shemiranat municipality; Regional Water and Electricity Corporation and National Gas Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Irankhahi, M., Jozi, S.A., Farshchi, P. et al. Combination of GISFM and TOPSIS to evaluation of Urban Environment Carrying Capacity (Case study: Shemiran City, Iran). Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14, 1317–1332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1243-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1243-0