Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carcinogenic risk evaluation for human health risk assessment from soils contaminated with heavy metals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human activities have progressively increased in recent years. Consequently, significant environment deterioration resulted. Soils have a particularly varied vulnerability to heavy metal pollution, especially in the vicinity of industrial areas. Heavy metal contamination of soil may induce risks and hazards to humans and the ecosystem, while toxic metals in soil can severely inhibit the biodegradation of organic contaminants. This paper is focused on human health risk assessment from extremely contaminated soil with heavy metals, mainly with carcinogenic elements. The study refers to an agricultural area in the vicinity of an old metallurgical processing industrial facility. The contaminants evaluated in the present paper are beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni) and lead (Pb). Contamination level is pointed out through laboratory analysis results of soil samples taken from 0–0.2 m, 0.2–0.4 m soil layers and up to 2.1 m soil depth. Some heavy metal concentrations (Cd, Cr and Pb) exceed the intervention thresholds for sensitive areas, as they are stipulated in the national regulation in Romania. The identified average concentration levels of Cd, CrVI and Pb in the first layer of the investigated land are 23.83, 7.71 and 704.22 mg/kgd.w, respectively. The results show that the potential risk of human health is relevant (higher than the acceptable one after World Health Organization) and a possible solution for the remediation should become a major concern for the investigated area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batayneh AT (2012) Toxic (aluminum, beryllium, boron, chromium and zinc) in groundwater: health risk assessment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9:153–162. doi:10.1007/s13762-011-0009-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Wang X, Meng X, Hua J, Zhou Z, Chen B, Kan H (2013) Communicating air pollution-related health risks to the public. An application of the Air Quality Health Index in Shanghai, China. Environmental International 51:168–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chibuike GU, Obiora SC (2014) Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Appl Environ Soil Sci, Article ID 752708, 12 p. doi:10.1155/2014/752708

  • Choi J (2006) Geochemical modeling of cadmium sorption to soil as a function of soil properties. Chemosphere 63:1824–1834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cocârţă DM, Dinu R, Dumitrescu C, Reşetar AM, Tanasiev V (2012) Risk based approach for thermal treatment of heavy metals contaminated soil. In: ICHMET 2012: 16th international conference on heavy metals in the environment, Roma, Italy, E3S Web of Conferences 1, 01005 (2013). doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20130101005

  • Dumitrescu C, Cocârţă D, Badea A (2012) An integrated modeling approach for risk assessment of heavy metals in soils. Sci Bull Univ POLITEHNICA Bucharest Ser D 74(3):217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Granero S, Domingo JL (2002) Levels of metals in soil of Alcalá de Henares, Spain: human health risks. Environ Int J 28:159–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VK, Yola ML, Atar N, Solak AO, Uzun L, Üstündağ Z (2013a) Electrochemically modified sulfisoxazole nanofilm on glassy carbon for determination of cadmium(II). Electrochim Acta 105:149–156. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VK, Yola ML, Atar N, Üstündağ Z, Solak AO (2013b) A novel sensitive Cu (II) and Cd(II) nanosensor platform: graphene oxide terminated p-aminophenyl modified glassy carbon surface. Electrochim Acta 112:541–548. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 11074 (2015) Soil quality—vocabulary

  • Khan S, Cao Q, Zheng YM, Huang YZ, Zhu YG (2008) Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 152:686–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XM, Wu JJ, Xu JM (2006) Characterizing the risk assessment of heavy metals and sampling uncertainty analysis in paddy field by geostatistics and GIS. Environ Pollut 141:257–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mani D, Kumar C (2014) Biotechnological advances in bioremediation of heavy metals contaminated ecosystems: an overview with special reference to phytoremediation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:843–872. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0299-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MO 756 (1997) Ministry Order No. 756 from November 3, 1997 for approval of Regulation concerning environmental pollution assessment, published in Official Monitor No. 303/6 November 1997

  • Novaes dos Santos S, Alleoni LRF (2013) Methods for extracting heavy metals in soils from the Southwestern Amazon, Brazil. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, ISSN 0049-6979, 224:1430

  • Rahib H, Seema AK, Muhammad TS, Liaqat A (2015) Multistatistical approaches for environmental geochemical assessment of pollutants in soils of Gadoon Amazai Industrial Estate, Pakistan. J Soils Sediments 15:1119–1129. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1075-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scancar J, Milacic R, Horvat M (2000) Comparison of various digestion and extraction procedures in analysis of heavy metals in sediments. Water Air Soil Pollut 118(1–2):87–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sposito G (1989) The chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press, New York. ISBN 9780195313697

    Google Scholar 

  • SR ISO 11047 (1999) Soil quality. Determination of cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, manganese, nickel and zinc in aqua regia extracts of soil. Flame and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometric methods

  • SR ISO 11083 (1998) Water quality. Determination of chromium (VI). Spectrometric method using 1,5-diphenylcarbazide

  • SR ISO 11466 (1999) Soil quality. Extraction of trace elements soluble in aqua regia

  • SR EN ISO 15586 (2004) Water quality—determination of trace elements using atomic absorption spectrometry with graphite furnace (ISO 15586:2003)

  • SR EN ISO 15587-1 (2002) Water quality—digestion for the determination of selected elements in water—Part 1: Aqua regia digestion

  • STAS 7184/1 (1984) Soils. Sampling for pedologycal and agrochemical investigations

  • Sun Y, Zhou Q, Xie X, Liu R (2010) Spatial, sources and risk assessment of heavy metal contamination of urban soils in typical regions of Shenyang, China. J Hazard Mater 174:455–462. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1989) United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/540/l-89/002 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. I Human Health Evaluation Manual, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response

  • US EPA (1997) Exposure factors handbook, Volumes I-III, Office of research and development, US EPA, Washington DC, USA, EPA/600/P-05/002Fa

  • Wang Z, Liu Y, Hu M, Pan X, Shi J, Chen F, He K, Koutrakis P, Christiani DC (2013) Acute health impacts of airborne particles estimated from satellite remote sensing. Environ Int J 51:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcke W, Mosbach J, Kobza J, Zech W (1998) Distribution of Al and heavy metals in bulk soil and aggregates at three sites contaminated by the emissions of a central slovak smelter. Water Air Soil Pollut 106(3–4):389–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Xia X, Lin C, Chen X, Zhou C (2010) Levels of arsenic and heavy metals in the rural soils of Beijing and their changes over the last two decades (1985–2008). J Hazard Mater 179:860–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye A, Zang S, Xiao H, Zhang L (2015) Speciation and ecological risk of heavy metals and metalloid in the sediments of Zhalong Wetland in China. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:115–124. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0399-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yola ML, Atar N, Qureshi MS, Üstündağ Z, Solak AO (2012) Electrochemically grafted etodolac film on glassy carbon for Pb(II) determination. Sensors Actuators B Chem 171–172:1207–1215. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yola ML, Eren T, İlkimen H, Atar N, Yenikaya C (2014) A sensitive voltammetric sensor for determination of Cd(II) in human plasma. J Mol Liq 197:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2014.04.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng N, Liu JSh, Wang QCh, Liang Zh (2010) Health risk assessment of heavy metal exposure to street dust in the zinc smelting district, Northeast of China. Sci Total Environ 408:726–733. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang P, McBride MB, Xia H, Li N, Li Z (2009) Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci Total Environ 407:1551–1561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the SOP IEC POSCCE-A2-O2.1.2.-2009-2, RECOLAND ID519, SMIS-CSNR: 11982, ctr. 182/18.06.2010, PNII-RU-TE2014-4-2348/REMPET Project, ctr. no 354/01.10.2015 and by the Erasmus + Programme, EduLabFrame project, contract no 2014-1-RO01-KA203-002986.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Cocârţă.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLS 110 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cocârţă, D.M., Neamţu, S. & Reşetar Deac, A.M. Carcinogenic risk evaluation for human health risk assessment from soils contaminated with heavy metals. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 2025–2036 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1031-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1031-2

Keywords

Navigation