Abstract
The extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) intends to offer a new framework for understanding evolution based mainly on empirical and theoretical findings of current studies, including heredity and evolutionary developmental biology. In this essay, we present and develop the following objections about the terminology associated with the EES literature: (1) despite using the term "extension," EES protagonists claim new evolutionary processes, reformulate conceptual networks, and modify central assumptions of the evolutionary synthesis (ES). Therefore, the difference between ES and EES should not be described in terms of a set-subset relationship (that is, as an extension); (2) despite using the term "synthesis," the EES leads, at least in the short term, to a pluralism of approaches in evolutionary biology. Thus, we argue that the EES should not be described as a synthesis, but as a broad and plural interpretative framework encompassing different approaches. These objections are not directed to the proposed changes, but to the interpretation of these changes as a mere expansion of the previous evolutionary framework, as well as to the interpretation of the EES as a synthesis. Based on these objections, we seek to present some explanations for the use of the term "extended synthesis" among its protagonists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cain J (2009) Rethinking the synthesis period in evolutionary studies. J Hist Biol 42:621–648
Craig LR (2010) The so-called extended synthesis and population genetics. Biol Theory 5:117–123
Eldredge N (1985) Unfinished synthesis: biological hierarchies and modern evolutionary thought. Oxford University Press, New York
Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf T (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco, pp 82–115
Goldschmidt R (1940) The Material Basis of Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven
Gould SJ (1980) Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6:119–130
Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc B 205:581–598
Huxley JS (1942) Evolution: the modern synthesis. Allen and Unwin, London
Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Hoppitt W, Uller T (2013) More on how and why: a response to commentaries. Biol Philos 28(5):793–810
Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW, Sterelny K, Müller GB, Moczek A et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Yes, urgently. Nature 514:161–164
Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW, Sterelny K, Müller GB, Moczek A et al (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc R Soc B 282(1813):20151019
Lewens T (2019) The extended evolutionary synthesis: what is the debate about, and what might success for the extenders look like? Biol J Linn Soc 127:707–721
Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1501–1506
Mitchell SD (2003) Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge University Press, New York
Müller GB (2017) Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary. Interface Focus 7:20170015
Pennock RT (2010) The postmodern sin of intelligent design creationism. Sci Educ (Dordr) 19:757–778
Pigliucci M, Müller GB (eds) (2010) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge
Provine WB (2001) The origins of theoretical population genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
dos Reis, C.R.M., Araújo, L.A.L. Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Neither Synthesis Nor Extension. Biol Theory 15, 57–60 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-020-00347-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-020-00347-6