Skip to main content
Log in

Why We Should Care About Universal Biology

  • Thematic Issue Article: Astrobiology
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our understanding of the universe has grown rapidly in recent decades. We’ve discovered evidence of water in nearby planets, discovered planets outside our solar system, mapped the genomes of thousands of organisms, and probed the very origins and limits of life. The scientific perspective of life-as-it-could-be has expanded in part by research in astrobiology, synthetic biology, and artificial life. In the face of such scientific developments, we argue there is an ever-growing need for universal biology, life-as-it-must-be, the multidisciplinary study of non-contingent aspects of life as guided by biological theory and constrained by the universe. We present three distinct but connected ways of universalizing biology—with respect to characterizing aspects of life everywhere, with respect to the explanatory scope of biological theory, and with respect to extending biological insights to the structure of nonbiological entities. For each of these, we sketch the theoretical goals and challenges, as well as give examples of current research that might be labeled universal biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As an anonymous reviewer points out, this section accepts the scientific interest of biologists as demarcating biology. Baryons are largely irrelevant to the features biologists study, so they would not be investigated within universal biology, but thermodynamics may yield many interesting principles of ecology, for example.

  2. He soon retracted the statement, saying, “I have changed my mind about the testability and logical status of the theory of natural selection; and I am glad to have an opportunity to make a recantation” (Popper 1978, p. 345).

  3. This discussion is slippery, as epigenetics and other relevant terms (e.g., plasticity, niche construction) are sometimes used in a nontechnical, metaphorical sense. We try to use only the specific understanding of epigenetic inheritance as described in Laland et al. 2015: chemical changes that alter DNA expression but not the underlying sequence.

  4. This may be a direct consequence of his definition of life—neither very ordered nor disordered systems can complete “work cycles.”

  5. As an anonymous reviewer points out, McShea’s theory is very much compatible with R.E. Ulanowicz’s (2003) notion of “ascendancy,” which refers to autocatalytic forms, and the idea that the complexity of configurations and reactions among molecules can help explain the emergence of life.

References

  • Bagg S (2017) When will a Darwinian approach be useful for the study of society? Polit Philos Econ. doi:10.1177/1470594X16687839

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett PH, Gautrey PJ, Herbert S, Kohn D, Smith S (eds) (1987) Charles Darwin’s notebooks, 1836–1844: Geology, transmutation of species, metaphysical enquiries. British Museum (Natural History). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty J (1995) The evolutionary contingency thesis. In: Lennox JG, Wolters G (eds) Concepts, theories and rationality in the biological sciences. University of Konstanz Press, Konstanz & University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 45–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner SA (2010) Defining life. Astrobiology 10(10):1021–1030. doi:10.1089/ast.2010.0524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner JT (2011) Why size matters: from bacteria to blue whales. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth A, Mariscal C, Doolittle WF (2016) The modern synthesis in the light of microbial genomics. Annu Rev Microbiol 70(1):279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F, Huneman P (2013) From groups to individuals: evolution and emerging individuality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon RN (1997) Does biology have laws? The experimental evidence. Philos Sci 64(Suppl):S444–S457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitbart M, Rohwer F (2005) Here a virus, there a virus, everywhere the same virus? Trends Microbiol 13(6):278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks DR, Wiley EO (1988) Evolution as entropy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruylants G, Bartik K, Reisse J (2010) Is it useful to have a clear-cut definition of life? On the use of fuzzy logic in prebiotic chemistry. Orig Life Evolut Biosph 40(2):137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou F, Johnson M (2016) NASA’s Kepler mission announces largest collection of planets ever discovered. NASA May 10, 2016, Press Release. http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasas-kepler-mission-announces-largest-collection-of-planets-ever-discovered. Accessed 27 June 2016

  • Cleland CE, Chyba CF (2002) Defining “life”. Orig Life Evolut Biosph 32(4):387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle M, Hu J, Gartner Z (2016) Mysteries in a minimal genome. ACS Cent Sci 2(5):274–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) Universal Darwinism. In: Bendall DS (ed) Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 403–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R ([1633]2010) Treatise on man. In: Bedau MA, Cleland CE (eds) The nature of life: classical and contemporary perspectives from philosophy and science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Diéguez A (2013) Life as a homeostatic property cluster. Biol Theory 7(2):180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dray W (1957) Laws and explanation in history. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré J (2014) A process ontology for biology. Philos Mag 67:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré J, Guttinger S (2016) Viruses as living processes. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.010

    Google Scholar 

  • England JL (2013) Statistical physics of self-replication. J Chem Phys 139:121923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiers W, Contreras R, Duerinck F et al (1976) Complete nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage MS2 RNA: primary and secondary structure of the replicase gene. Nature 260(5551):500–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming L (2012) Network theory and the formation of groups without evolutionary forces. Evol Biol 39(1):94–105. doi:10.1007/s11692-011-9140-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming L, Brandon R (2015) Why flying dogs are rare: a general theory of luck in the evolutionary transitions. Stud Hist Philos Sci C 49:24–31. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.10.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A (2014) Life, the universe and everything. Biol Philos 29(2):207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, Conlon JP (2013) Cosmological natural selection and the purpose of the universe. Complexity 18:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray MW, Doolittle WF (1982) Has the endosymbiont hypothesis been proven? Microbiol Rev 46(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermida M (2016) Life on Earth is an individual. Theory Biosci 135(1–2):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin LN, Schulze-Makuch D (2011) Cosmic biology: how life could evolve on other worlds. Praxis, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jabr F (2013) Why life does not really exist. Scientific American. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/brainwaves/2013/12/02/why-life-does-not-really-exist/. Accessed 29 May 2014

  • Jonsson KI, Rabbow E, Schill RO, Harms-Ringdahl M, Rettberg P (2008) Tardigrades survive exposure to space in low earth orbit. Curr Biol 18:R729–R731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce GF (1994) Foreword. In: Deamer DW, Fleischaker GR (eds) Origins of life: the central concepts. Jones & Bartlett, Boston, pp xi–xii

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (1993) The origins of order: self organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (1995) At home in the universe: the search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay LE (1992) The molecular vision of life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Koonin EV (2000) How many genes can make a cell: the minimal-gene-Set concept 1. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 1(1):99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski H (2016) First minimal synthetic bacterial cell designed and constructed by Scientists at Venter Institute and Synthetic Genomics, Inc. March 24, 2016, Press Release. http://www.jcvi.org/cms/press/press-releases/full-text/article/first-minimal-synthetic-bacterial-cell-designed-and-constructed-by-scientists-at-venter-institute-an/. Accessed 25 June 2016

  • Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, Kuris AM (2006) Parasites dominate food web links. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(30):11211–11216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Yes, urgently. Nature 514(7521):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW et al (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc R Soc B 282:20151019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange M (2002) Who’s afraid of ceteris-paribus laws? Or: how I learned to stop worrying and love them. Erkenntnis 57(3):407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langton CG (ed) (1989) Artificial life. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Machery E (2011) Why I stopped worrying about the definition of life … and why you should as well. Synthese 185:145–164

  • McGuire BA, Carroll PB, Loomis RA et al (2016) Discovery of the interstellar chiral molecule propylene oxide (CH3CHCH2O). Science 352(6292):1449–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW (2012) Upper-directed systems: a new approach to teleology in biology. Biol Philos 27:663e684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW (2016) Freedom and purpose in biology. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 58:64–72. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW, Brandon RN (2010) Biology’s First Law: the tendency for diversity & complexity to increase in evolutionary systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SD (1997) Pragmatic laws. Philos Sci 64(4):479

  • Morris JJ, Lenski RE, Zinser ER (2012) The Black Queen Hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive gene loss. MBio 3(2):e00036-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson R (1975) Is biology a provincial science? Philos Sci 42(4):428–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel E (1979) Teleology revisited and other essays in the philosophy an history of science. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbø CL, Dlutek M, Doolittle WF (2006) Recombination in Thermotoga: implications for species concepts and biogeography. Genetics 172(2):759–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (1970) Note on complex systems. J Theor Biol 28:411–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öberg KI, Guzmán VV, Furuya K et al (2015) The comet-like composition of a protoplanetary disk as revealed by complex cyanides. Nature 520(7546):198. doi:10.1038/nature14276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojha L, Wilhelm MB, Murchie SL et al (2015) Spectral evidence for hydrated salts in recurring slope lineae on Mars. Nat Geosci 8(11):829–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2009) An extended synthesis for evolutionary biology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1168(1):218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci MM, Müller GB (2010) Evolution—the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1976) Unended quest: an intellectual autobiography. Open Court, LaSalle

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1978) Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica 32:339–355

  • Powell R, Mariscal C (2015) Convergent evolution as natural experiment: the tape of life reconsidered. Interface focus 5(6):20150040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice SH (2004) Evolutionary theory: mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg A (1984) The supervenience of biological concepts. In: Sober E (ed) Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology. Bradford Books-MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 99–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf C, Virgo N, Cleaves HJ et al (2015) A strategy for origins of life research. Astrobiology 15(12):1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sczepanski JT, Joyce GF (2014) A cross-chiral RNA polymerase ribozyme. Nature 515(7527):440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro R, Feinberg G (1980) Life beyond Earth: the intelligent earthling’s guide to life in the universe. William Morrow, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart JJC (1963) Philosophy and scientific realism. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart JJC (1968) Between science and philosophy. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KC (2016) Life is hard: countering definitional pessimism concerning the definition of life. Int J Astrobiol 15(4):277–289. doi:10.1017/S1473550416000021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolin L (1992) Did the universe evolve? Class Quantum Gravity 9:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolin L (1997) The life of the cosmos. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerhoff G (1950) Analytical biology. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K, Griffiths P (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifonov EN (2011) Vocabulary of definitions of life suggests a definition. J Biomol Struct Dyn 29(2):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (2003) On the ordinality of causes in complex autocatalytic systems. Ann N Y Acad Sci 988:154–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh C, Loomis RA, Öberg KI et al (2016) First detection of gas-phase methanol in a protoplanetary disk. Astrophys J Lett 823(1):L10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters E, Hohn MJ, Ahel I et al (2003) The genome of Nanoarchaeum equitans: insights into early archaeal evolution and derived parasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(22):12984–12988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welikala N, Béthermin M, Guery D et al (2016) Probing star formation in the dense environments of z ~ 1 lensing haloes aligned with dusty star-forming galaxies detected with the South Pole Telescope. Mon Not R Astron Soc 455(2):1629–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray AE, Hoekstra HE, Futuyma DJ et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? No, all is well. Nature 514(7521):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kelly C. Smith and several anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Mariscal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mariscal, C., Fleming, L. Why We Should Care About Universal Biology. Biol Theory 13, 121–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0280-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0280-8

Keywords

Navigation