Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced port laparoscopic radical nephrectomy using an umbilical zigzag skin incision for renal cell carcinoma

  • Case report
  • Published:
International Cancer Conference Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reduced port laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RPLRN) is an equivalent approach to conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). In LRN, one wound generally needs to be extended for specimen extraction; therefore, some ingenuity is needed to achieve a good cosmetic outcome. We herein describe our initial experience of RPLRN using an umbilical zigzag skin incision for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A 64-year-old female [body mass index (BMI): 20.0 kg/m2] was diagnosed with right RCC, which was 35 mm in diameter (clinical T1aN0M0). Case 2: a 68-year-old male (BMI: 23.2 kg/m2) was diagnosed with right RCC, which was 58 mm in diameter (clinical T1bN0M1), and perinephric fat was relatively thick. The procedure was safely completed in both cases. Total operative times, pneumoperitoneal times, and estimated blood loss in Case 1 and 2 were 90 and 145 min, 49 and 90 min, and 5 and 80 ml, respectively, and the times required to construct umbilical ports and close umbilical wounds were 8 and 9 min and 33 and 46 min, respectively. In Case 1, the specimen was easily extracted without the extension of the umbilical skin incision, whereas it was extended by an additional 2 cm in Case 2. The umbilical wound was inconspicuous in both cases. RPLRN using an umbilical zigzag skin incision for RCC was safely performed without complications, and clashing between instruments was minimized. The high level of cosmesis is advantageous and an umbilical zigzag skin incision may contribute to more widespread use of RPLRN for RCC; however, further studies on long-term oncological outcomes are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, Roemer FD, Pingleton ED, Thomson PG, Long SR (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bensalah K, Dabestani S, Fernandez-Pello S, Giles RH, Hofmann F, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Kuusk T, Lam TB, Marconi L, Merseburger AS, Powles T, Staehler M, Tahbaz R, Volpe A, Bex A (2019) European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol 75:799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, Stern JM, Cadeddu JA (2007) Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology 70:1039–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA (2009) Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 55:1198–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park YH, Park JH, Jeong CW, Kim HH (2010) Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy with conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol 24:997–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seo IY, Lee JW, Rim JS (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopy. J Endourol 25:465–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nomura T, Yamasaki M, Takei K, Sato F, Terachi T, Mimata H (2018) Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic reduced-port bilateral radical nephrectomy for a patient with renal cell carcinoma undergoing hemodialysis. Asian J Endosc Surg 11:177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamasaki M, Shin T, Sato R, Hirai K, Kan T, Fujinami H, Mori K, Sumino Y, Nomura T, Sato F, Masuda H, Yonese J, Mimata H (2016) Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic reduced-port radical nephrectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 9:222–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zou X, Zhang G, Xue Y, Yuan Y, Xiao R, Wu G, Wang X, Wu Y, Long D, Yang J, Xu H, Liu F, Liu M (2014) Transumbilical multiport laparoscopic nephrectomy with specimen extraction through the vagina. Urol Int 92:407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hachisuka T, Kinoshita T, Yamakawa T, Kurata N, Tsutsuyama M, Umeda S, Tokunaga S, Yarita A, Shibata M, Shimizu D, Shikano T, Hattori K, Mori T, Shinohara M, Miyauchi M (2012) Transumbilical laparoscopic surgery using GelPort through an umbilical zigzag skin incision. Asian J Endosc Surg 5:50–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirano D, Minei S, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa T, Hachiya T, Yoshida T, Ishida H, Takimoto Y, Saitoh T, Kiyotaki S, Okada K (2005) Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors via a single large port. J Endourol 19:788–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyajima A, Hattori S, Maeda T, Hasegawa M, Takeda T, Kikuchi E, Asanuma H, Nakagawa K, Oya M (2012) Transumbilical approach for laparo-endoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: initial experience and short-term outcome. Int J Urol 19:331–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M, Haber GP, Goldfarb DA, Flechner S, Desai MR, Kaouk JH, Desai MM (2008) Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 180:637–641 (discussion 641)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaneko G, Miyajima A, Hasegawa M, Kikuchi E, Nakagawa K, Oya M (2012) Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy using a microwave tissue coagulator. Int Cancer Conf J 1:176–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA (2009) Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology 74:1029–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Desai MM, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 72:1190–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hora M (2018) Editorial comment to urological laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port surgery: a nationwide survey in Japan. Int J Urol 25:268–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Merseburger AS, Herrmann TR, Shariat SF, Kyriazis I, Nagele U, Traxer O, Liatsikos EN (2013) EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology. Eur Urol 64:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Narita M, Kageyama S, Okegawa T, Kinoshita H, Sato F, Nakagawa K, Habuchi T, Hoshi A, Matsubara A, Yoshimura K, Terachi T, Mimata H, Kawauchi A (2018) Urological laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port surgery: a nationwide survey in Japan. Int J Urol 25:263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang JH, Lee SY, Kim CH, Kim HR, Kwak HD, Ju JK, Kim YJ (2018) Comparison of the short-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional multiport surgery in colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 94:147–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kato K, Hisa T, Matoda M, Nomura H, Kanao H, Utsugi K, Takeshima N (2017) Extraction of a specimen through an umbilical zigzag incision during laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer. World J Surg Oncol 15:110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Umeda S, Hachisuka T, Otsu T, Hishida M, Nagai S, Shimizu M, Kobayashi H, Nozaki H (2018) Reduced-port endo-laparoscopic surgery using umbilical zigzag incision for concomitant operations: a case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 51:170–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ponsky LE, Steinway ML, Lengu IJ, Hartke DM, Vourganti S, Cherullo EE (2009) A pfannenstiel single-site nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy: a practical application of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 74:482–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anesthesiologists and operating room staff at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center for their surgical support.

Funding

There is no funding to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Go Kaneko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed herein involving patients were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committees and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 72677 kb)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 20507 kb)

Supplementary file3 (MP4 102824 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaneko, G., Shirotake, S., Kanao, K. et al. Reduced port laparoscopic radical nephrectomy using an umbilical zigzag skin incision for renal cell carcinoma. Int Canc Conf J 9, 212–216 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-020-00426-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-020-00426-2

Keywords

Navigation